Other versions:

(Verbatim name)

ID

(Catalog Number)

ORG

DES

Invalid DOI was provided, please try again

XML
PDF
Bluesky
Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CiteCite
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • FigsFigs
  • TabsTabs
  • MapMap
  • DataData
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • Article title
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Introduction
  • Material and methods
    • Study area
    • Vegetation survey
    • Data analysis
  • Results and discussion
    • Group 1 – Communities dominated by bryophytes
    • Comparison of habitats 32A0 and 7220* and proposal for Elsa River as a 32A0 Site
    • Group 2 – Aquatic communities dominated by algae and hydrophytic species
    • Group 3 – Communities of tall-herb humid meadows
    • Group 4 – Communities dominated by woody species
    • Threats and Conservation of Elsa River riverine habitats
  • Conclusions
  • Competing interests
  • Funding statement
  • Data availability
  • Author contributions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Supplementary material
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories
Powered by