<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://ved.arphahub.com/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">136</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Vegetation Ecology and Diversity</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">VED</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">3033-1447</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Italian Society of Vegetation Science (SISV)</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/ved.197154</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">197154</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Angiospermae</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Biostatistic analysis and Data Banks</subject>
          <subject>Habitats Directive</subject>
          <subject>Plant Community Conservation and Management</subject>
          <subject>Plant Community Traits</subject>
          <subject>Plant Ecology and Synecology</subject>
          <subject>Vegetation mapping</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>UAV-based RGB imagery for assessing vegetation status in a Mediterranean area affected by <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic></article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bertacchi</surname>
            <given-names>Andrea</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-3876</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Orazi</surname>
            <given-names>Diego</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6591-8427</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Campigli</surname>
            <given-names>Sara</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7231-535X</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Marchi</surname>
            <given-names>Guido</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2937-3500</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Drosera</surname>
            <given-names>Lorenzo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Lombardi</surname>
            <given-names>Tiziana</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">tiziana.lombardi@unipi.it</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0427-1820</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Department of Agricultural, Food and Agro-Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy</addr-line>
        <institution>Department of Agricultural, Food and Agro-Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Pisa</addr-line>
        <country>Italy</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/03ad39j10</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy</addr-line>
        <institution>Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Firenze</addr-line>
        <country>Italy</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/04jr1s763</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Servizio Fitosanitario della Regione Toscana (SFR), Firenze, Italy</addr-line>
        <institution>Servizio Fitosanitario della Regione Toscana (SFR)</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Firenze</addr-line>
        <country>Italy</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Tiziana Lombardi (<email xlink:type="simple">tiziana.lombardi@unipi.it</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p><bold>Academic editor</bold>: Gianmarco Tavilla</p>
        </fn>
        <fn>
          <p><bold>Linguistic editor</bold>: Nicole Sebesta</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>25</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>63</volume>
      <elocation-id>e197154</elocation-id>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/FE076325-3548-5C03-811E-1E9AB007EE04">FE076325-3548-5C03-811E-1E9AB007EE04</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>25</day>
          <month>04</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>28</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Andrea Bertacchi, Diego Orazi, Sara Campigli, Guido Marchi, Lorenzo Drosera, Tiziana Lombardi</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>Vegetation monitoring in areas affected by plant pathogens is essential for assessing the vulnerability of plant communities and supporting the management of infected territories. Although field surveys remain the cornerstone of vegetation monitoring, RGB UAV technology is increasingly proving its value at local and regional scales for mapping plant communities and detecting diagnostic species of Annex I habitats. This study presents the results of a vegetation monitoring program carried out in 2021 and 2025 in a natural area of Monte Argentario (southern Tuscany, Italy), where <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> subsp. <italic>multiplex</italic> ST87 has been spreading since 2018. Field surveys were integrated with UAV-based photogrammetric mapping and photointerpretation of ultra-high-resolution orthomosaics over a 2.5 ha polygon encompassing a mosaic of three Natura 2000 habitats (H9340, H5330, and H6220*). Multivariate analyses identified three floristically distinct assemblages corresponding to the main habitat types, and species-area analysis confirmed the representativeness of the sampling design. Comparing the two survey campaigns, the plant community showed remarkable compositional stability: species richness remained unchanged, and the minor increase in Shannon diversity reflected subtle shifts in relative dominance rather than any directional floristic change. Among the <italic>Xylella</italic> target species, <italic>Cytisus laniger</italic> showed a significant and counter-intuitive increase in cover, possibly reflecting a pre-symptomatic phase of infection or the intrinsic canopy expansion dynamics of this fast-growing resprouting shrub. The study establishes an important pre-symptomatic baseline for long-term monitoring of these habitats.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>Mediterranean shrubland</kwd>
        <kwd>Natura 2000 habitats</kwd>
        <kwd>UAVs</kwd>
        <kwd>vegetation monitoring</kwd>
        <kwd>
          <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic>
        </kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Vegetation surveys have long been used to monitor ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg 1974</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Lengyel et al. 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">ISPRA 2016</xref>). In addition to being the most widely used approach for vegetation classification, the phytosociological method has proven to be one of the most effective tools for monitoring plant communities and habitats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Godínez-Alvarez et al. 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Biondi et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Kent 2012</xref>).</p>
      <p>This applies both to surveys aimed at assessing anthropogenic impacts and transformations, and to investigations of damage caused by natural events, air pollution, and plant diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Gallet et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Vacek et al. 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Konatowska and Rutkowski 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bertacchi 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Vennin et al. 2025</xref>). In recent years, ground-based surveys have been gradually complemented by remote sensing observations which, depending on the spatial scale considered, range from satellite imagery to drone-based data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Turner et al. 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Fornace et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">de Castro et al. 2021</xref>).</p>
      <p>UAV technology has proven especially valuable for surveying vegetation in difficult-to-reach areas, thanks to the high level of photographic detail achievable from aerial platforms, which allows remote recognition of different taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Strumia et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Bertacchi et al. 2025</xref>).</p>
      <p>When integrated with GIS systems, UAV platforms also enable precise quantification of species cover across vegetation patches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Chianucci et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Quattrini et al. 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bertacchi et al. 2026</xref>). Similarly, UAV technology is proving extremely useful in the fields of plant pathology detection and monitoring (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Duarte et al. 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Perroy et al. 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Kouadio et al. 2023</xref>).</p>
      <p>The present study followed the first detection of <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> subsp. <italic>multiplex</italic> ST87 (hereinafter Xfm ST87) in Tuscany, recorded in November 2018 by the Regional Phytosanitary Service (hereinafter <abbrev xlink:title="Regional Phytosanitary Service">SFR</abbrev>) in the Municipality of Monte Argentario (GR) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Marchi et al. 2018</xref>). <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> is a xylem-restricted bacterium naturally transmitted from plant to plant by insect vectors that feed on xylem fluids, primarily belonging to the families Aphrophoridae, Cercopidae, and Cicadellidae. The host range globally includes over 463 plant species distributed across 210 genera and 71 families (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">EFSA 2026</xref>). In some plant species, the progressive reduction in water flow within the vascular elements, caused by the accumulation of bacterial biofilm as well as by gums and tylose produced by the host, often leads to nonspecific symptoms of water deficiency that can easily be confused with those induced by other biotic and abiotic stress factors. During the early stages of colonization, leaf scorch, wilting, yellowing or bronzing, and premature leaf drop are commonly observed. Subsequently, twigs and branches of shrubs and trees begin to die back and, in some cases, the entire plant may die <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">(EPPO 2020</xref>). Inexplicably, however, in the vast majority of its hosts, <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> manages to proliferate without causing any apparent disease, thus behaving more like a commensal rather than a primary phytopathogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Burbank and Roper 2021</xref>). Nevertheless, its introduction into new geographic areas followed by the fortuitous encounter with a new, highly susceptible host can have devastating consequences, as recently demonstrated by the outbreak of Olive Quick Decline Syndrome in Apulia (Italy) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Scortichini 2026</xref>). As a result, <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> is currently included in the list of quarantine pests under European legislation (EU 2019/2072). In addition to the well-known threat posed to several agricultural crops and ornamentals including grapevine, citrus, coffee, oleander and olive (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Sicard et al. 2018</xref>), concerns have also been raised about the potential risk to European forest and wild species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Desprez-Loustau et al. 2020</xref>).</p>
      <p>In Corsica, Apulia and Tuscany, small trees or shrubs typical of the Mediterranean maquis, such as <italic>Rhamnus</italic> or <italic>Cistus</italic>, were reported among hosts of <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Denancé et al. 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">EFSA 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Saponari et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Falsini et al. 2025</xref>).</p>
      <p>Since 2018, Xfm ST87 has spread throughout much of the Monte Argentario territory, primarily in the two coastal areas to the north and south of the promontory. From 2018 to the present, of the 175 taxa sampled, 29 (16.5%) have tested positive at least once. Some of the wild species characteristic of the Monte Argentario habitats have proven to be particularly susceptible to the pathogen: common broom (<italic>Spartium junceum</italic> L., Fabaceae), hairy thorny broom (<italic>Cytisus laniger</italic> DC., Fabaceae), buckthorn (<italic>Rhamnus alaternus</italic> L., Rhamnaceae) and white rockrose (<italic>Cistus monspeliensis</italic> L., Cistaceae). These species are widely distributed throughout the territory examined and were considered target species in the <abbrev xlink:title="Regional Phytosanitary Service">SFR</abbrev> sampling and monitoring to delimit infected and buffer zones. It should be noted that to date, the olive tree (preferential host in Puglia for the ST53 of <italic>pauca</italic> subspecies) has never been found infected with Xfm ST87 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">SFR 2026</xref>).</p>
      <p>Among the questions that the <abbrev xlink:title="Regional Phytosanitary Service">SFR</abbrev> asked itself in establishing a strategy for controlling, delimiting and, possibly, eradicating the pathogen from the territory of Monte Argentario, was to somehow determine the danger of the pathogen to the conservation of the natural habitats present in this territory in their vegetational component. This is largely determined by the impact that phytopathologies can have on natural plant communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Gilbert 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Burdon et al. 2006</xref>).</p>
      <p>For this reason, monitoring activities on the vegetation component of a sample area of Monte Argentario began in 2021, based on drone surveys and followed by field surveys; this investigation presents the first findings on the potential impact of Xfm ST87 on phytocoenoses that are characteristic of Monte Argentario’s habitats.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
      <title>Material and methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Study area" id="sec3">
        <title>Study area</title>
        <p>Monte Argentario is a coastal promontory located in southwestern Tuscany, central Italy (<named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">42.399339°N, 11.154622°E</named-content>) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). Although orographically isolated from the mainland, it is connected to the Tuscan coast by two sandy tombolos and an internal lagoon system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Lazzarotto et al. 1964</xref>). The promontory covers approximately 60 km<sup>2</sup> and is characterized by steep rocky cliffs and rugged topography, reaching 635 m a.s.l. at Punta Telegrafo.</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/ved.197154.figure1</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">7426BB7E-8F80-5659-AFD0-74D4B80FC28E</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Geographical location of the Monte Argentario promontory (southern Tuscany, Italy).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="ved-63-001-g001.jpg" id="oo_1790658.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1790658</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Geologically, the area exhibits a complex assemblage of limestone and dolostone, metasandstone, acid metavolcanic rock, calcschist, and metamorphic ophiolite (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Carmignani and Lazzarotto 2004</xref>), while the climate is Mediterranean (Csa type: hot-summer Mediterranean climate; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Köppen 1936</xref>), with mild winters and hot, dry summers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Arrigoni and Di Tommaso 1997</xref>).</p>
        <p>Bioclimatically, the area falls within the Mediterranean macrobioclimate (pluviseasonal-oceanic variant), spanning a gradient from the lower mesomediterranean thermotype at coastal elevations to the upper mesomediterranean thermotype towards the summit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Pesaresi et al. 2017</xref>), within the Mediterranean Biogeographic Region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">European Environment Agency 2017</xref>).</p>
        <p>The vascular flora of Monte Argentario includes approximately 1200 taxa. The biological spectrum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Raunkiaer 1934</xref>) shows a predominance of therophytes (40%), followed by hemicryptophytes (30%), and geophytes (15%). This pattern, together with the prevalence of Mediterranean, East-Mediterranean, and Atlantic-Mediterranean chorotypes confirms the strictly Mediterranean character of the area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Baldini 1995</xref>).</p>
        <p>The structure of the vegetation is a dynamic mosaic of sclerophyllous evergreen forests and their degradation stages, including Mediterranean shrubland, garrigues, and discontinuous annual grasslands. This mosaic reflects long-term anthropogenic influence (agriculture, grazing, recurrent fires, and land abandonment) superimposed on natural successional processes.</p>
        <p>Phytosociologically, these communities can be framed within the classes <italic>Quercetea ilicis</italic> Br.-Bl. ex A. Bolòs y Vayreda 1950, <italic>Querco-Fagetea</italic> Br.-Bl. and Vlieger in Vlieger 1937, and <italic>Festuco-Brometea</italic> Br.-Bl. and Tx. ex Br.-Bl. 1949 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Arrigoni and Di Tommaso 1997</xref>).</p>
        <p>Thirteen habitat types listed in Annex I of the EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) have been identified in the area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Viciani et al. 2018</xref>).</p>
        <p>The most representative habitats are:</p>
        <list list-type="bullet">
          <list-item>
            <p>Habitat 9340: <italic>Quercus ilex</italic> and <italic>Quercus rotundifolia</italic> forests (~2000 ha);
                    </p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>Habitat 5330: Thermo-Mediterranean and pre-desert scrub (~1000 ha);
</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>Habitat 6220*: Pseudo-steppe with grasses and annuals of the <italic>Thero-Brachypodietea</italic> (~506 ha).
                    </p>
          </list-item>
        </list>
        <p>Habitats 5330 and 6220* frequently form intricate mosaics representing dynamic successional or degradation stages. Abandoned olive groves (~700 ha) are currently progressing towards Habitat 5330. In addition, approximately 1200 ha are occupied by active agricultural land and 600 ha by urban areas and infrastructure.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Field surveys and UAV technology" id="sec4">
        <title>Field surveys and UAV technology</title>
        <p>The study was conducted in the Valle della Soda area, a north–south oriented valley located in the northern sector of Monte Argentario (Tuscany, Italy). A 2.5 ha study polygon was delineated to include the valley bottom (impluvium) and adjacent slopes, encompassing the main habitat mosaic present in the area (Natura 2000 habitats 9340, 5330 and 6220*) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>a, b); the site falls within the officially designated “demarcated area” according to EU Regulation 2020/120 (Article 4).</p>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/ved.197154.figure2</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">7FDDB872-7DBC-5D38-88BF-FC8BCDC17F81</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Localization on Monte Argentario of the survey site (<bold>a</bold> and <bold>b</bold>) and drone orthophotomosaic (<bold>c</bold>) of the sample area with the overlapping plots.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="ved-63-001-g002.jpg" id="oo_1790659.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1790659</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>To determine the presence or absence of <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> subsp. <italic>multiplex</italic> ST87 (Xfm ST87) in the study site, annual surveys, from 2021 to 2025, were carried out following EFSA and EPPO guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">EFSA 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">EPPO 2023</xref>) and in accordance with the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1201. The area spans an elevational gradient from 130 to 240 m a.s.l., allowing the inclusion of structurally heterogeneous vegetation types within a limited spatial extent. An integrated field–UAV surveys approach was adopted.</p>
        <p>In May–June 2021, a complete floristic survey of the study area was conducted to document the species pool of the site. In the same period, vegetation surveys were performed within permanent plots. Twelve permanent plots were established to sample the habitat mosaic occurring within the study area. Plot size was defined according to physiognomy: 10 × 10 m in tree-dominated stands and 5 × 5 m in shrub- and herb-dominated stands. Plots were georeferenced and permanently recorded to ensure precise relocation during the second survey campaign in 2025 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>c ; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S3). The same plots were resurveyed in June–July 2025 under comparable phenological conditions.</p>
        <p>Field surveys allowed confirmation of the taxonomic identification of species recognizable on the orthomosaics and the recording of taxa not detectable from aerial imagery due to canopy overlap, small size, or chromatic similarity. Species cover within each plot was quantified through mapping on ultra-high-resolution RGB orthomosaics derived from UAV imagery, allowing precise spatial delineation of vegetation patches without relying on visual field estimates.</p>
        <p>Botanical nomenclature follows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bartolucci et al. (2024)</xref> and subsequent updates provided by the Portal to the Flora of Italy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Martellos et al. 2020</xref>). Biological life forms and chorological types were assigned following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Pignatti et al. (2017–2019)</xref>. Diagnostic species for Annex I habitats (Directive 92/43/EEC) were specifically recorded to support habitat attribution and vegetation classification.</p>
        <p>UAV surveys were conducted in both vegetation-sampling years using different UAV platforms. In 2021, flights were performed with a DJI Phantom 4 Pro equipped with a 20 MP RGB sensor (1" CMOS; 24 mm equivalent focal length). In 2025, surveys were conducted using a DJI Mini 4 Pro equipped with a 48 MP RGB sensor (1/1.3" CMOS; 24 mm equivalent focal length). Automated flight missions were programmed at a constant elevation of 25 m above ground level, with 60% forward overlap and 80% side overlap. Based on flight elevation and sensor geometry, the theoretical Ground Sampling Distance (<abbrev xlink:title="Ground Sampling Distance">GSD</abbrev>) was approximately 0.68 cm/pixel for the Phantom 4 Pro and 0.44 cm/pixel for the Mini 4 Pro under ideal geometric conditions. A summary of the UAV survey parameters for both campaigns is provided in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Summary of the UAV survey workflow (2021 and 2025 campaigns).</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>2021 survey</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>2025 survey</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Platform</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">DJI Phantom 4 Pro</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">DJI Mini 4 Pro</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Sensor</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20 MP RGB, 1" CMOS, 24 mm equiv.</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">48 MP RGB, 1/1.3" CMOS, 24 mm equiv.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Ground Sample Distance (<abbrev xlink:title="Ground Sampling Distance">GSD</abbrev>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">≈ 0.68 cm/pixel</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">≈ 0.44 cm/pixel</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Flight elevation</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="2">25 m AGL</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Overlap</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="2">60% forward / 80% side</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Exposure settings</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="2">Automatic exposure, fixed white balance</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Orthomosaic software</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="2">Agisoft Metashape Professional v. 1.7.5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Delineation method</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="2">Manual (human-operator photointerpretation)</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>No ground control points (<abbrev xlink:title="ground control points">GCPs</abbrev>) were deployed; georeferencing relied on the onboard GNSS system of the UAVs. Given the limited spatial extent of the study area (2.5 ha), the ultra-high spatial resolution of the imagery, and the plot-based analytical framework, relative spatial consistency between survey years was considered sufficient for accurate intra-plot comparisons.</p>
        <p>Flights in both years were conducted under stable weather conditions, with clear or slightly hazy skies, no precipitation, and low wind speed (&lt; 5 m/s), to minimize motion blur and illumination variability. Missions were carried out between 10:30 and 14:30 local time to ensure high solar elevation and reduced shadow effects. Camera settings were maintained consistent across flights using automatic exposure and fixed white balance to minimize chromatic variability between survey years.</p>
        <p>Image alignment, dense point cloud generation, orthomosaic production, and 3D reconstruction were performed in Agisoft Metashape (v. 1.7.5) (Agisoft LLC 2021) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). Model quality was assessed using the reprojection Root Mean Square Error (<abbrev xlink:title="Root Mean Square Error">RMSE</abbrev>), which averaged 0.29 pixels. Orthomosaics were georeferenced in WGS 84/UTM zone 32N (EPSG: 32632) and analyzed in QGIS 3.42.0.</p>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/ved.197154.figure3</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">81F33168-E7EB-5FE3-9AFA-CF012822974C</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>3D reconstruction of the sample area and restitution of the three habitat types.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="ved-63-001-g003.jpg" id="oo_1790660.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1790660</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Within each permanent plot, species cover was quantified through the manual delineation of individual taxa on ultra-high-resolution RGB orthomosaics, performed by a human operator.</p>
        <p>Only species previously recorded and taxonomically confirmed during field surveys were mapped. Field observations conducted in both years were used to validate species presence and support image-based delineation, thereby reducing misclassification among morphologically similar taxa. Mapping focused primarily on dominant or structurally distinguishable species exhibiting consistent canopy texture or chromatic patterns. Absolute cover values (m<sup>2</sup>) were converted into percentage cover as (species area / plot area) × 100, allowing direct interannual comparison (2021–2025).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data analysis and processing" id="sec5">
        <title>Data analysis and processing</title>
        <p>To assess the spatial distribution of plant species and validate the adequacy of the sampling effort, the Species-Area Relationship (SAR) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Tjørve and Tjørve 2017</xref>) was modelled using the Arrhenius power function (S = c A<sup>z</sup>), where S is the number of species, A is the area, c is a constant representing the expected richness per unit area, and z represents the species accumulation rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Arrhenius 1921</xref>).</p>
        <p>The SAR was fitted using a log-log linear regression on 13 data points, comprising the 12 permanent plots individually (areas of 0.0025 ha for shrub- and herb-dominated stands and 0.01 ha for tree-dominated stands, with species richness recorded during the 2021 survey) and the total study polygon (2.5 ha, with the total number of species recorded through the complete floristic survey conducted in 2021). The Arrhenius power function <italic>S</italic> = <italic>c</italic> · <italic>A<sup>z</sup></italic> was linearized by log-log transformation for regression fitting, with the <italic>z</italic>-value estimated as the slope of the ordinary least squares regression and <italic>c</italic> derived from the intercept.</p>
        <p>It should be noted that the plot-scale areas correspond to spatially non-contiguous permanent plots rather than nested sampling units, and that the two plot sizes reflect differences in vegetation physiognomy rather than a systematic area gradient. The resulting exponent therefore reflects scaling between individual sampling units and landscape extent rather than a classical nested-area design, and direct comparisons with <italic>z</italic>-values derived from strictly nested designs should be made with caution.</p>
        <p>Additionally, to test the ecological plausibility of the observed richness, the expected number of species at the landscape scale was independently calculated using literature-based <italic>z</italic>-values typical for Mediterranean shrublands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Drakare et al. 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Tjørve 2009</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data structure and transformation" id="sec6">
        <title>Data structure and transformation</title>
        <p>Vegetation data were organized as a species × plot matrix using percentage cover values recorded in 2021 and 2025. To evaluate potential temporal shifts in community composition, analyses were conducted on square-root transformed cover data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Legendre and Gallagher 2001</xref>). The square-root transformation was applied to reduce the disproportionate influence of highly dominant taxa, particularly <italic>Ampelodesmos mauritanicus</italic>, which structurally characterizes parts of the study area. This transformation allowed greater sensitivity to change in subdominant and shrub-layer species.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Hierarchical clustering" id="sec7">
        <title>Hierarchical clustering</title>
        <p>Floristic–vegetational patterns among permanent plots were explored through hierarchical cluster analysis. Species cover values were square-root transformed to reduce the influence of dominant taxa while preserving relative abundance structure. Dissimilarity between plots was calculated using the Bray–Curtis index, which is widely recommended for ecological community data due to its sensitivity to compositional differences and its robustness to joint absences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Legendre and Legendre 2012</xref>).</p>
        <p>Agglomerative hierarchical clustering was performed using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA; average linkage). The resulting dendrogram was visually inspected and subsequently partitioned into alternative cluster solutions (<italic>k</italic> = 2 and <italic>k</italic> = 3) to explore primary and secondary compositional structures. Cluster boundaries were identified by examining the distribution of fusion heights in the dendrogram. All multivariate analyses were conducted using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix derived from transformed cover data.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Alpha-diversity analysis" id="sec8">
        <title>Alpha-diversity analysis</title>
        <p>To evaluate temporal changes in local plant biodiversity, alpha-diversity was assessed for each permanent plot by calculating Species Richness (S), the Shannon Diversity Index (H’) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Shannon 1948</xref>), Simpson’s Index (1−D) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Simpson 1949</xref>), and Pielou’s Evenness (J’) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Pielou 1966</xref>). Species richness was defined as the total number of vascular plant species recorded per plot. Shannon diversity was calculated as: H’ = −Σ p<sub>i</sub> ln(p<sub>i</sub>) where p<sub>i</sub> represents the proportional cover of species i within each plot. All indices were calculated from raw percentage cover values, consistently with standard alpha-diversity practice. To account for the repeated-measures design of the permanent plots, differences in alpha-diversity metrics between the first survey (2021) and the resurvey (2025) were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test because the data were not normally distributed.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ordination analysis (PCoA) and PERMANOVA" id="sec9">
        <title>Ordination analysis (<abbrev xlink:title="Principal Coordinates Analysis">PCoA</abbrev>) and PERMANOVA</title>
        <p>To visualize floristic gradients and assess the spatio-temporal dynamics of the plant communities, unconstrained ordination was performed using Principal Coordinates Analysis (<abbrev xlink:title="Principal Coordinates Analysis">PCoA</abbrev>). The ordination was based on the same Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix applied in the hierarchical clustering, derived from square-root transformed species cover data. <abbrev xlink:title="Principal Coordinates Analysis">PCoA</abbrev> was performed to visualize multivariate differences among plots and sampling years in reduced ordination space. Temporal separation was assessed by inspecting clustering patterns along the first two principal coordinate axes.</p>
        <p>To test for statistically significant differences in species composition, a Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Anderson 2001</xref>) was conducted. For PERMANOVA, pseudo-<italic>F</italic> statistics, <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> values, and <italic>p</italic>-values were reported.</p>
        <p>To test for temporal changes in community composition, Year (2021 vs. 2025) was used as the explanatory factor. To account for the repeated-measures design of the permanent plots, permutations were constrained within each Plot ID (used as a block/stratum), ensuring that the temporal effect was tested within the same spatial units. A total of 9999 permutations was specified. A complementary PERMANOVA model including Plot as an explicit factor was also fitted to quantify spatial structuring among permanent plots. Cluster membership derived from hierarchical clustering was used for descriptive interpretation of vegetation assemblages and was not included as an explanatory factor in the PERMANOVA models. Homogeneity of multivariate dispersion among years was evaluated using PERMDISP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Anderson 2006</xref>) to ensure that significant PERMANOVA results, if detected, were attributable to shifts in centroid location rather than differences in within-group variability.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Species contribution (SIMPER)" id="sec10">
        <title>Species contribution (SIMPER)</title>
        <p>Similarity Percentage (SIMPER) analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Clarke 1993</xref>) was performed to identify the species contributing most to the average Bray–Curtis dissimilarity between surveys conducted in 2021 and 2025. The analysis was applied to square-root transformed species cover data, consistent with the transformation used for distance-based multivariate analyses.</p>
        <p>SIMPER decomposes the overall between-group dissimilarity into the contribution of individual species by calculating the average contribution of each taxon to the Bray–Curtis distance between groups. Species contributions were expressed both as absolute average dissimilarity and as percentage contribution to total between-year dissimilarity. Cumulative contributions were used to identify the set of taxa accounting for the majority of interannual compositional differences.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Software" id="sec11">
        <title>Software</title>
        <p>Flight missions were planned and executed using the DJI Fly® application (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">DJI 2024</xref>). UAV images were processed through a photogrammetric workflow in Agisoft Metashape Professional® (64 bit) to generate dense point clouds and orthomosaics.</p>
        <p>Spatial analyses, vegetation interpretation, and cartogra­phic outputs were performed using QGIS (version 3.42.0) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">QGIS Development Team 2024</xref>).</p>
        <p>Statistical analyses were conducted in R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">R Core Team 2024</xref>), and community-level metrics were calculated using the vegan package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Oksanen et al. 2023</xref>).</p>
        <p>The vegetation dataset supporting the results of this study is available as Supplementary material (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S2).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec12">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Xfm ST87 detection in the study site" id="sec13">
        <title>Xfm ST87 detection in the study site</title>
        <p>During the monitoring, 34 taxa were analyzed as a whole, comprising a total of 454 samples. The presence of Xfm ST87 in the study site could be confirmed in each year, although estimated annual incidence varied considerably: the lowest was in 2022 (0.062), when the sampling effort was greatest (192 analyzed), and the highest was in 2024 (0.186), when 43 plants were analyzed. This variation in sampling efforts reflects both the need, in the early years, to test a broader range of plant species in order to identify those in which the bacterium could most easily be detected by PCR, and the specific aim of this monitoring, namely to confirm the consistent presence of the pathogen over time rather than to quantify its prevalence within the study area (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S1).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Floristic composition" id="sec14">
        <title>Floristic composition</title>
        <p>A total of 90 vascular plant species were recorded within the study area, including both the permanent survey plots and the surrounding area (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table SS1).</p>
        <p>The overall floristic composition reflects the Mediterranean sclerophyllous vegetation framework typical of Natura 2000 Habitat 5330 (Thermo-Mediterranean and pre-desert scrub), with localized structural elements referable to Habitat 9340 (<italic>Quercus ilex</italic> forests).</p>
        <p>Habitat 6220* (Pseudo-steppe with grasses and annuals of the <italic>Thero-Brachypodietea</italic>) occurs in small patches within the broader landscape matrix but is only marginally represented within the sampled permanent plots (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S2).</p>
        <p>The biological spectrum highlights a strong structural dominance of woody life forms, reflecting the physiognomy of the local habitats. Phanerophytes (including nanophanerophytes) constitute the most abundant life form, accounting for 58.9% of the total flora, followed by hemicryptophytes (13.3%), chamaephytes (11.1%), and therophytes (11.1%).</p>
        <p>From a phytogeographical perspective, Mediterranean chorotypes dominate the assemblage (63.3% of species), including 44.4% Steno-Mediterranean and 18.9% Euri-Mediterranean elements. Eurasian and paleotemperate chorotypes represent a minor fraction (13.3%), mainly linked to the shadier understory conditions of Habitat 9340 or localized mesic microhabitats.</p>
        <p>UAV imagery integrated with GIS-based spatial analysis was employed to quantify absolute and relative ground cover and to assess diachronic changes between 2021 and 2025 (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S2).</p>
        <p>Field surveys remained essential for the accurate identification of most herbaceous species and small shrub or tree seedlings. Drone imagery proved fully reliable for larger shrub and arboreal taxa.</p>
        <p>Within the permanent plots monitored in 2021 and 2025, a total of 43 species were identified (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S2).</p>
        <p>Vegetation is primarily composed of two dominant taxa showing the highest cover and frequency values: <italic>Ampelodesmos mauritanicus</italic> (mean cover 37%; 100% frequency) and <italic>Erica multiflora</italic> (mean cover 14%; 80% frequency), confirming the prevalence of shrub–grass typical of Habitat 5330.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Species–area relationship (SAR)" id="sec15">
        <title>Species–area relationship (SAR)</title>
        <p>A log-log linear regression of species richness against area was applied across the 13 data points (12 permanent plots and the total study polygon) to estimate the general species accumulation trend (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.886, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). The estimated scaling exponent was <italic>z</italic> = 0.299 (± 0.032 SE) and the intercept parameter <italic>c</italic> = 63.49, giving the species–area function:</p>
        <p>S = 63.49 × A<sup>0.299</sup></p>
        <p>(with A expressed in hectares).</p>
        <p>Given the non-nested structure of the design (see Methods), these statistics should be interpreted in light of their primary purpose: assessing whether the observed species richness of 90 taxa at 2.5 ha is ecologically consistent with theoretical expectations.</p>
        <p>The observed value is broadly consistent with the model prediction (S = 83.5) and falls within the range predicted from literature-based <italic>z</italic>-values for continuous Mediterranean vegetation (<italic>z</italic> = 0.15–0.25; predicted range: 73–80 species), supporting the adequacy of the sampling design (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S3).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Vegetation hierarchical cluster analysis" id="sec16">
        <title>Vegetation hierarchical cluster analysis</title>
        <p>Cluster analysis applied to vegetation survey data identified three compositional assemblages (Cluster A, Cluster B and Cluster C) within the study area (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S2; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). At a Bray-Curtis dissimilarity threshold of approximately 0.54, the dendrogram clearly resolves these three distinct groupings, indicating meaningful floristic differentiation within the sampled vegetation mosaic.</p>
        <fig id="F4">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/ved.197154.figure4</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">7BF3B9E7-1615-501A-950A-C677B3493BCB</object-id>
          <label>Figure 4.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Hierarchical clustering of vegetation plots based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity calculated on square-root transformed species cover data, using UPGMA linkage. The red dashed line indicates the dissimilarity threshold used to identify major clusters corresponding to different vegetation types (see text for details).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="ved-63-001-g004.jpg" id="oo_1790661.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1790661</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Cluster A (Plot 6, 7, and 8) is characterized by higher cover of woody sclerophyllous taxa including <italic>Arbutus unedo</italic>, <italic>Pistacia lentiscus</italic>, <italic>Erica arborea</italic>, and <italic>Quercus ilex</italic>, species diagnostic to Habitat 9340.</p>
        <p>Cluster B (Plot 1–5, 9, 11, and 12) encompasses the majority of surveyed plots and is dominated by <italic>Ampelodesmos mauritanicus</italic>, <italic>Erica multiflora</italic>, <italic>Cytisus laniger</italic>, and various <italic>Cistus</italic> species, diagnostic to Habitat 5330.</p>
        <p>Cluster C (Plot 10) captures a subgroup floristically and physiognomically attributable to an intermediate vegetation type between Habitats 5330 and 9340.</p>
        <p>Cluster analysis consistently grouped surveys conducted within the same plot in 2021 and 2025 into paired subclusters. Each 2021 survey clustered with its corresponding 2025 survey, indicating strong compositional consistency between the two survey campaigns. Observed interannual differences were limited to minor shifts in relative dominance among co-occurring woody species, with no evidence of directional floristic change.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Alpha-diversity patterns" id="sec17">
        <title>Alpha-diversity patterns</title>
        <p>Species richness (S), Shannon Diversity (H’), Simpson’s Index (1−D), and Pielou’s Evenness (J’) were compared between 2021 and 2025 using Wilcoxon signed-rank paired tests to account for the repeated-measures design (n = 12 plots).</p>
        <p>Species Richness (S) did not differ significantly between years (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, <italic>W</italic> = 5.0, <italic>p</italic> = 0.750). The Shannon Diversity Index (H’) showed a marginal numerical variation, shifting from a mean of 1.690 (± 0.327 SD) in 2021 to 1.711 (± 0.343 SD) in 2025 (<italic>W</italic> = 13.0, uncorrected <italic>p</italic> = 0.043).</p>
        <p>Similarly, Simpson’s Index (1−D) and Pielou’s Evenness (J’) displayed positive trends just below the significance threshold (1−D: <italic>W</italic> = 15.0, <italic>p</italic> = 0.064; J’: <italic>W</italic> = 16.0, <italic>p</italic> = 0.077). As median and interquartile ranges were broadly comparable between survey years (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>), these subtle fluctuations represent microscopic adjustments in relative species abundances rather than robust structural changes, confirming the overall stability of local alpha-diversity over the study period.</p>
        <fig id="F5">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/ved.197154.figure5</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">3FD6B7C5-B71A-591C-AF9F-D28B1F306F97</object-id>
          <label>Figure 5.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Temporal variations in alpha-diversity within the monitored permanent plots (n = 12). Boxplots display the median and interquartile ranges for Species Richness (S), Shannon Diversity Index (H’), Simpson’s Index (1−D), and Pielou’s Evenness (J’) recorded in 2021 and 2025. Individual plot values are represented by dots, with lines connecting paired observations from the same plot. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests indicated no significant change in S (<italic>p</italic> = 0.750), a significant increase in H’ (<italic>p</italic> = 0.043), and non-significant positive trends for 1−D (<italic>p</italic> = 0.064) and J’ (<italic>p</italic> = 0.077).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="ved-63-001-g005.jpg" id="oo_1790662.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1790662</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ordination analysis (PCoA) and PERMANOVA" id="sec18">
        <title>Ordination analysis (<abbrev xlink:title="Principal Coordinates Analysis">PCoA</abbrev>) and PERMANOVA</title>
        <p>The first two axes explained 41.8% and 16.4% of the total variation, respectively (58.2% cumulative). Ordination revealed strong overlap between sampling years, with each permanent plot maintaining close spatial proximity to its corresponding resurvey. No consistent directional displacement between years was evident along the main ordination axes, and paired surveys clustered tightly in multivariate space.</p>
        <p>To formally test temporal effects while accounting for the repeated-measures design, a PERMANOVA was performed with permutations constrained within plots (strata = Plot). The analysis detected a statistically significant effect of Year (Pseudo-<italic>F</italic> = 0.087; <italic>p</italic> = 0.007). However, the explained variance associated with the temporal factor was extremely low (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.0039), indicating that Year accounted for less than 0.4% of total compositional variability (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F6">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/ved.197154.figure6</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">633A6120-52A4-58E7-9E60-F8CF96E11568</object-id>
          <label>Figure 6.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Principal Coordinates Analysis (<abbrev xlink:title="Principal Coordinates Analysis">PCoA</abbrev>) ordination based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity of square-root transformed species cover data. Symbols represent the individual vegetation surveys, with circles indicating the baseline sampling in 2021 and triangles representing the 2025 resurveys. Different colors identify the 12 permanent plots (P1–P12). Dashed lines connect paired observations from the same plot, visualizing their temporal trajectories over the study period. The exceptionally short trajectories and the strong overlap between years highlight the high compositional stability and structural inertia of the plant communities. In contrast, the spatial separation of the plots across the ordination space reflects the strong underlying habitat heterogeneity.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="ved-63-001-g006.jpg" id="oo_1790663.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1790663</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>A complementary model including Plot as an explicit factor confirmed significant spatial structuring among plots (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> ≈ 0.995; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), whereas the marginal contribution of Year remained negligible.</p>
        <p>No significant differences in dispersion between years were detected (<italic>F</italic> = 0.0011; <italic>p</italic> = 0.972), indicating comparable within-group variability and excluding dispersion-driven effects in the PERMANOVA results.</p>
        <p>Collectively, multivariate analyses indicate strong spatial differentiation among plots and minimal temporal compositional change between 2021 and 2025.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="SIMPER analysis" id="sec19">
        <title>SIMPER analysis</title>
        <p>Although the overall interannual dissimilarity was low and the temporal effect negligible in PERMANOVA terms (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.0039), SIMPER analysis was performed to identify which species, and in particular which <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> target species, contributed most to the observed between-year compositional differences. This information is directly relevant to the phytosanitary monitoring objectives of the study, as it allows assessment of whether the minimal floristic change detected was concentrated in susceptible taxa or distributed diffusely across the community.</p>
        <p>Overall interannual dissimilarity was low, consistent with the limited variance explained by Year in PERMANOVA. The highest individual contributions to between-year dissimilarity were associated with <italic>Cytisus laniger</italic> (36.3%), followed by <italic>Brachypodium sylvaticum</italic> (11.6%), <italic>Erica multiflora</italic> (8.3%), and <italic>Cistus monspeliensis</italic> (6.5%) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>). Notably, <italic>Cytisus laniger</italic>, the Xfm ST87 target species showing the most marked cover increase over the monitoring period, accounted alone for over one third of total interannual dissimilarity, reflecting its floristic dynamism within an otherwise stable community. The remaining target species (<italic>Spartium junceum</italic>, <italic>Rhamnus alaternus</italic>, <italic>Cistus monspeliensis</italic>) contributed marginally and showed no directional change. Between-year dissimilarity was otherwise distributed diffusely across common perennial taxa, with no single non-target species accounting for a disproportionate share of variation.</p>
        <fig id="F7">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/ved.197154.figure7</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">F3731339-0F7F-5A49-8438-5162BBF7AB12</object-id>
          <label>Figure 7.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>SIMPER analysis of species contributions to 2021–2025 Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. Bar plot showing the top ten species contributing to between-year dissimilarity. <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> target species are highlighted in red; other species in blue.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="ved-63-001-g007.jpg" id="oo_1790664.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1790664</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec20">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <sec sec-type="Floristic richness and biological spectrum" id="sec21">
        <title>Floristic richness and biological spectrum</title>
        <p>The total vascular flora recorded in the Valle della Soda study area, 90 species over a 2.5 ha polygon, reflects the floristic richness expected for well-preserved Mediterranean maquis and garrigue mosaics of the Tyrrhenian coast. The dominance of Steno-Mediterranean and Euri-Mediterranean chorotypes (63.3% combined) is consistent with the biogeographic positioning of Monte Argentario within the Mediterranean Biogeographic Region and aligns with the phytosociological framework of the <italic>Quercetea ilicis</italic> class, which characterizes the sclerophyllous evergreen vegetation of the central-western Mediterranean basin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Blasi et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Biondi et al. 2014</xref>). The strong prevalence of phanerophytes (58.9%), with therophytes accounting for only 11.1% of the total flora, indicates a structurally mature community at a shrubland-to-woodland transitional stage, little affected by recent large-scale disturbances such as fire or intensive grazing. The very low therophyte cover within permanent plots (below 1%) reinforces this interpretation, as annual species tend to expand under post-disturbance or soil-degradation conditions in Mediterranean ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Lloret et al. 2005</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Species-area relationship: sampling adequacy and structural interpretation" id="sec22">
        <title>Species-area relationship: sampling adequacy and structural interpretation</title>
        <p>The species-area scaling exponent obtained (<italic>z</italic> = 0.299 ± 0.032 SE, <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.886, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) falls within the theoretical range proposed for continuous, non-isolated continental ecosystems (z = 0.15–0.30; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Rosenzweig 1995</xref>), and is consistent with values reported for Mediterranean shrubland and semi-natural vegetation systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Drakare et al. 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Tjørve 2009</xref>), albeit at the upper boundary of this interval. The high goodness of fit confirms that the Arrhenius power function adequately describes species accumulation across the sampled spatial extents, from individual plots to the full study polygon. This value is also fully coherent with the physiognomic and structural characteristics of the Habitat 5330-dominated mosaic: as demonstrated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Keeley and Fotheringham (2003)</xref>, shrub-dominated communities characterized by a dense matrix of perennial woody species and a low occurrence of annuals typically exhibit stable and relatively low z-values — precisely the pattern observed here, where phanerophytes and chamaephytes account for nearly 70% of the biological spectrum while therophytes are marginally represented.</p>
        <p>The exponent obtained is slightly higher than broader Italian baseline estimates (z ≈ 0.26) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">D’Antraccoli et al. 2024</xref>). Rather than reflecting a scale-dependent dampening effect, this modest upward deviation is best interpreted as a consequence of the structural and floristic heterogeneity of the three-habitat mosaic (H9340, H5330, H6220*), which generates higher compositional turnover across short distances than would be expected in a more physiognomically homogeneous system. In such mature sclerophyllous systems, spatial heterogeneity is driven by the gradual structural maturation of dominant taxa rather than by sharp compositional discontinuities or pioneer species invasion.</p>
        <p>The observed richness of 90 species at 2.5 ha slightly exceeds the value predicted by the fitted model (S = 83.5) and the interval obtained from literature-based z-values for continuous Mediterranean vegetation (z = 0.15–0.25; predicted range: 73–80 species) yet remains fully coherent with SAR expectations for Mediterranean shrubland landscapes. The species richness values recorded within individual permanent plots are consistent with the fitted species-area function across the full range of sampled areas (0.0025–0.01 ha), with no systematic deviation detected at plot scale. The SAR analysis therefore serves a dual interpretative role: it validates the adequacy of the sampling design, confirming that the selected plots proportionately captured the core diversity of the 2.5 ha area, and provides a spatial framework that helps contextualize the strong compositional inertia and temporal stability observed in the multivariate analyses between 2021 and 2025.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Vegetation analysis and habitat interpretation" id="sec23">
        <title>Vegetation analysis and habitat interpretation</title>
        <p>The hierarchical cluster analysis identified a clear vegetation composition within the investigated vegetation mosaic. The two-cluster solution defines the primary organizational pattern of the system, with a secondary partition emerging at k = 3 and clearly resolved at a Bray-Curtis dissimilarity threshold of approximately 0.54. Although cluster boundaries are gradual rather than sharp, as expected in Mediterranean sclerophyllous landscapes characterized by continuous structural transitions among vegetation phases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Whittaker 1967</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Legendre and Legendre 2012</xref>), the three groupings are consistently supported by the <abbrev xlink:title="Principal Coordinates Analysis">PCoA</abbrev> ordination results.</p>
        <p>Cluster A, dominated by sclerophyllous arboreal taxa (<italic>Arbutus unedo</italic>, <italic>Pistacia lentiscus</italic>, <italic>Erica arborea</italic>, <italic>Quercus ilex</italic>), corresponds structurally to the Habitat 9340 woodland matrix, whereas Cluster B, encompassing the majority of surveyed plots, reflects the shrub-grass maquis physiognomy of Habitat 5330, with <italic>Ampelodesmos mauritanicus</italic> and <italic>Erica multiflora</italic> as structural dominants. Cluster C captures a secondary level of structural heterogeneity, representing a floristically transitional subgroup characterized by increased dominance of woodland-associated species while retaining shrub physiognomy. However, habitat classification under Natura 2000 requires concordance between floristic composition and physiognomic structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">European Commission 2013</xref>): although woodland-associated species contribute substantially to this assemblage (~36% of mean total cover), canopy continuity remains incomplete and shrub dominance persists. The identified unit therefore represents a structurally mature expression within Habitat 5330, showing woodland affinity without reaching the structural threshold of Habitat 9340.</p>
        <p>No independent therophyte-dominated assemblage emerged from the multivariate analysis, and no cluster was characterized by dominance of annual species. The very limited representation of therophytes (mean cover below 1%) indicates that Habitat 6220* elements, while potentially present in the broader landscape matrix, do not constitute a floristically coherent unit within the sampled area. The floristic-vegetational data collected are consistent with those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Arrigoni and Di Tommaso (1997)</xref> for similar environmental settings on Monte Argentario.</p>
        <p>Temporal consistency reinforces this structural interpretation: surveys conducted in 2021 and 2025 consistently grouped within the same clusters, with each plot pairing its two survey years into tight subclusters. Observed changes were restricted to compensatory dominance shifts among co-occurring woody taxa, without evidence of directional turnover. Such dynamics are characteristic of mature Mediterranean sclerophyllous systems, where structural maturation and canopy development prevail over rapid compositional replacement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Keeley and Fotheringham 2003</xref>). Overall, the convergence of hierarchical clustering, ordination analysis, and temporal stability indicates that the study area constitutes a spatially coherent and structurally mature Mediterranean shrub–woodland mosaic, whose detected differentiation reflects internal successional gradients within Habitat 5330 rather than discrete habitat entities, consistent with ecological theory describing community structure as a continuum shaped by gradual environmental and structural transitions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Whittaker 1967</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">McGill et al. 2006</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Temporal stability of community composition" id="sec24">
        <title>Temporal stability of community composition</title>
        <p>The most striking result of the present study is the remarkable compositional stability of the monitored vegetation between 2021 and 2025. Although the PERMA­NOVA formally detected a significant temporal effect (<italic>p</italic> = 0.007), the associated explained variance was negligible (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.0039), indicating that Year accounted for less than 0.4% of total floristic variability. This outcome illustrates the well-documented distinction between statistical significance and ecological relevance in multivariate community analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Anderson 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Legendre and Legendre 2012</xref>): with permutations constrained within plots, even microscopic shifts in relative cover become detectable, yet their biological meaning remains trivial. The much larger contribution of Plot identity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.995) confirms strong spatial differentiation among plots, consistent with the local environmental heterogeneity of the study area. The <abbrev xlink:title="Principal Coordinates Analysis">PCoA</abbrev> ordination is fully consistent with this interpretation. Paired surveys from the same plot clustered tightly in multivariate space, with trajectories so short as to be indistinguishable from sampling noise, and no consistent directional displacement was detectable along either principal axis.</p>
        <p>SIMPER analysis corroborated this picture while adding a relevant layer of interpretation. The decomposition of the negligible interannual dissimilarity revealed that <italic>Cytisus laniger</italic> alone accounted for 36.3% of between-year floristic change, a disproportionate contribution for a single taxon in an otherwise stable community, directly reflecting its significant cover increase documented in the Target dynamics section. This result confirms that the minimal compositional shift detected between 2021 and 2025 was not distributed randomly across the flora but was concentrated in the most dynamically active Xfm ST87 target species. The remaining target species contributed marginally to interannual dissimilarity, consistent with their cover stability over the monitoring period. Together, these analyses paint a coherent picture of strong structural and compositional inertia, a hallmark of mature, stress-tolerant Mediterranean woody vegetation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Blondel and Aronson 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Lloret et al. 2012</xref>), while identifying <italic>Cytisus laniger</italic> as the floristic element most deserving of attention in future resurveys.</p>
        <p>Such structural inertia is not merely a passive property of established vegetation. Mediterranean woody communities, and maquis formations in particular, are known to exhibit considerable buffering capacity against moderate disturbance through resprouting, clonal growth, and the persistent soil seed bank (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Pausas et al. 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Verdú and Pausas 2007</xref>). The absence of any detectable floristic collapse over the monitoring period therefore does not preclude the ongoing presence of Xfm ST87 in the study area, but indicates that the plant community as a whole has not yet experienced measurable phytopathological impact at the community scale. Landscape-level effects of <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> subsp. <italic>pauca</italic> on olive groves in Apulia have been documented only after a decade or more of progressive symptom development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Saponari et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Boscia et al. 2017</xref>), suggesting that the period examined here may be insufficient to detect early-stage floristic shifts in species with slow demographic turnover such as the woody taxa dominating this study area.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Alpha-diversity patterns: stability with a subtle evenness shift" id="sec25">
        <title>Alpha-diversity patterns: stability with a subtle evenness shift</title>
        <p>Alpha-diversity results are consistent with the overall picture of community stability, while revealing subtle internal shifts in species dominance. Species richness remained perfectly stable between the two survey campaigns (<italic>W</italic> = 5.0, <italic>p</italic> = 0.750), indicating that no local extinctions or colonizations occurred within the permanent plots, a result consistent with the conserved floristic matrix documented by multivariate analyses.</p>
        <p>While the Shannon Diversity Index displayed a slight numerical fluctuation between the two survey campaigns (from 1.690 to 1.711; uncorrected <italic>p</italic> = 0.043), alongside marginal positive trends for Simpson’s Index (1−D) and Pielou’s Evenness (J’), the absolute magnitude of these shifts was ecologically negligible (delta = +0.021 for Shannon). Thus, the overall pattern is best interpreted as stable: the community did not genuinely diversify, but the distribution of relative abundances shifted very slightly towards greater evenness.</p>
        <p>This subtle shift in uniformity, in the absence of any change in species richness, is consistent with a partial redistribution of cover between species rather than compositional substitution. For example, the slight decline in cover dominance of <italic>Ampelodesmos mauritanicus</italic> is offset by the increase in subdominant species. Such minor fluctuations in diversity metrics without changes in species richness have been documented in Mediterranean shrublands undergoing post-disturbance recovery or interannual climatic variability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">De Cáceres et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Lloret et al. 2012</xref>), and do not necessarily imply any directional ecological trend.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Target dynamics" id="sec26">
        <title>Target dynamics</title>
        <p>The analysis of the Xfm ST87 target species recorded in the permanent plots (<italic>Cytisus laniger</italic>, <italic>Spartium junceum</italic>, <italic>Rhamnus alaternus</italic> and <italic>Cistus monspeliensis</italic>) constitutes perhaps the most ecologically significant component of the present study, as it directly addresses the primary concern motivating the monitoring design.</p>
        <p>None of the target species showed a decline in cover over the study period. <italic>Spartium junceum</italic> and <italic>Rhamnus alaternus</italic> were perfectly stable across all twelve plots (Δ = 0 in all cases). <italic>Cistus monspeliensis</italic> was largely stable across plots (Δ = 0 in 10 out of 12 plots), with only minor and non-directional cover fluctuations (contributing 6.5% to interannual dissimilarity). <italic>Cytisus laniger</italic>, one of the <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> subsp. <italic>multiplex</italic> ST87 host species reported in the Mediterranean maquis of central Italy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">EFSA 2026</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Falsini et al. 2025</xref>), showed not a decline but a statistically significant increase in mean cover, rising from 6.37% in 2021 to 10.97% in 2025 (W = 0, p = 0.0078), with cover increasing in eight out of twelve plots and remaining unchanged in the remaining four. This result is unambiguous and counter-intuitive from a strictly pathological perspective.</p>
        <p>Several non-mutually exclusive interpretations can be advanced. First, the absence of visible decline in <italic>C. laniger</italic> may reflect the early and sub-symptomatic phase of infection, during which bacterial colonization progresses through the xylem vessels without yet triggering the severe water stress and scorching symptoms that characterize advanced disease stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Saponari et al. 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Sicard et al. 2018</xref>). Second, it is possible that the local populations of <italic>C. laniger</italic> exhibit a degree of tolerance or partial resistance to the bacterium, as has been documented for certain genotypes of <italic>Xylella</italic> hosts in other contexts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Velasco-Amo et al. 2020</xref>). Third, the observed cover increase may simply reflect the intrinsic growth dynamics of a fast-growing, resprouting leguminous shrub, whose canopy expansion between the two survey campaigns is well within the range of natural interannual variability in Mediterranean shrublands, independent of any pathological process. Finally, the monitoring window may simply be insufficient to detect early-stage population declines in a perennial resprouting shrub, whose vegetative growth can mask underlying root and xylem damage for several growing seasons before external symptoms become visible (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Saponari et al. 2019</xref>).</p>
        <p>Regardless of the mechanism involved, the absence of vegetation variation over the 2021–2025 period is an important baseline finding. It provides a reference against which future resurveys, particularly if extended to a ten-year horizon, can detect the onset of plant landscape change.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conclusions" id="sec27">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study offers one of the first assessments of how Mediterranean maquis and garrigue vegetation responds to the presence of <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> subsp. <italic>multiplex</italic> ST87, based on a sampling design whose adequacy was independently confirmed by the species-area analysis. Between 2021 and 2025, the plant communities of Monte Argentario’s Valle della Soda proved remarkably stable across all three Natura 2000 habitats monitored, with no species lost and no sign of directional change, a result that fits well with what is known about the resilience of mature Mediterranean shrub vegetation, which can absorb moderate disturbance through resprouting, clonal growth and a persistent soil seed bank. The one exception was <italic>Cytisus laniger</italic>, whose cover increased significantly and consistently enough to make it the species to watch in future surveys. Because the incubation period of <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> can vary enormously, from a few months to several years depending on the host, these five years are best treated as an early, pre-symptomatic baseline rather than proof that the vegetation is unaffected. Only monitoring extended over a longer period, ideally a decade or more, will tell us whether and how this pathogen eventually leaves a mark on the landscape.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Agisoft LLC (2021) Agisoft Metashape Professional, version 1.7.5. Agisoft LLC, St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26: 32–46. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Anderson MJ (2006) Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62: 245–253. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00440.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00440.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Anderson MJ (2017) Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). In: Balakrishnan N, Colton T, Everitt B, Piegorsch W, Ruggeri F, Teugels JL (Eds) Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/9781118445112.stat07841" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07841</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Arrhenius O (1921) Species and area. Journal of Ecology 9: 95–99. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2307/2255763" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/2255763</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Arrigoni PV, Di Tommaso PL (1997) La vegetazione del Monte Argentario (Toscana meridionale). Parlatorea 2: 5–38.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Baldini RM (1995) Flora vascolare del Monte Argentario (Arcipelago Toscano). Webbia 50(1): 67–191. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00837792.1995.10670598" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00837792.1995.10670598</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Bartolucci F, Peruzzi L, Galasso G, Alessandrini A, Ardenghi NMG, … Conti F (2024) A second update to the checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy. Plant Biosystems 158(2): 219–296. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/11263504.2024.2320126" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2024.2320126</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Bertacchi A (2022) UAVs technology as a complementary tool in post-fire vegetation recovery surveys in Mediterranean fire-prone forests. Forests 13: 1009. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/f13071009" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071009</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Bertacchi A, Orazi D, Ercolini L (2025) The ledge plant communities in a limestone cave of the Apuan area: identification and survey by UAV technology. Italian Botanist 20: 9–22. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/italianbotanist.20.145009" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/italianbotanist.20.145009</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Bertacchi A, Orazi D, Bedini S, Lombardi T (2026) Spatial Analysis and Spread Monitoring of a Population of <italic>Juniperus macrocarpa</italic> Sm. Across Coastal Dune Systems in Northern Tuscany (Italy). Biology 15(3): 278. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/biology15030278" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15030278</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Biondi E, Blasi C, Burrascano S, Casavecchia S, Copiz R, … Zivkovic L (2010) Manuale italiano di interpretazione degli habitat della Direttiva 92/43/CEE. Società Botanica Italiana, Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, DPN. <ext-link xlink:href="http://vnr.unipg.it/habitat" ext-link-type="uri">http://vnr.unipg.it/habitat</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Biondi E, Blasi C, Allegrezza M, Anzellotti I, Azzella MM, … Zivkovic L (2014) Plant communities of Italy: the VegItaly database. Plant Biosystems 148: 430–443.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Blasi C, Marignani M, Copiz R, Fipaldini M, Del Vico E (2010) Important plant areas: using plant diversity to identify key sites for conservation in Italy. Plant Biosystems 144: 298–306.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Blondel J, Aronson J (1999) Biology and wildlife of the Mediterranean region. Oxford University Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Boscia D, Altamura G, Saponari M, Tavano D, Zicca S, … Cornara D (2017) Incidence of <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> subsp. <italic>pauca</italic> in olive trees and other host plants in areas under containment and delay strategies in Apulia, Italy. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 56: 605–613.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Burbank LP, Roper MC (2021) Microbe profile: <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic>–a devastating agricultural pathogen with an endophytic lifestyle. Microbiology 167(10): 001091. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1099/mic.0.001091" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.001091</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Burdon JJ, Thrall PH, Ericson AL (2006) The current and future dynamics of disease in plant communities. Annual Review of Phytopathology 44: 19–39. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.140238" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.140238</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Carmignani L, Lazzarotto A (2004) Carta geologica della Toscana (scala 1:250.000). Università di Siena, Dipartimento Scienze della Terra, Centro di GeoTecnologie, Regione Toscana, Firenze.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Chianucci F, Disperati L, Guzzi D, Bianchini D, Nardino V, … Corona P (2016) Estimation of canopy attributes in beech forests using true colour digital images from a small fixed-wing UAV. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 47: 60–68. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.jag.2015.12.005" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.12.005</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 117–143. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>D’Antraccoli M, Peruzzi L, Conti F, Bartolucci F (2024) Floristic richness in a Mediterranean hotspot: a journey across Italy. Plants 13: 12. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/plants13010012" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010012</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>De Cáceres M, Chytrý M, Agrillo E, Attorre F, Botta-Dukát Z, … Wiser SK (2015) A comparative framework for broad-scale plot-based vegetation classification. Applied Vegetation Science 18: 543–560. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/avsc.12179" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12179</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>de Castro AI, Shi Y, Maja JM, Peña JM (2021) UAVs for vegetation monitoring: overview and recent scientific contributions. Remote Sensing 13: 2139. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/rs13112139" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112139</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Denancé N, Legendre B, Briand M, Olivier V, De Boisseson C, … Belin S (2017) Several subspecies and sequence types are associated with the emergence of <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> in natural settings in France. Plant Pathology 66: 1054–1064. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/ppa.12695" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12695</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Desprez-Loustau ML, Balci Y, Cornara D, Gonthier P, Robin C, Jacques MA (2020) Is <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> a serious threat to European forests? Forestry 94: 1–17. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/forestry/cpaa029" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaa029</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>DJI (2024) DJI Fly. SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Drakare S, Lennon JJ, Hillebrand H (2006) The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species–area relationships. Ecology Letters 9: 215–227. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00848.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00848.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Duarte A, Borralho N, Cabral P, Caetano M (2022) Recent advances in forest insect pests and diseases monitoring using UAV-based data: a systematic review. Forests 13(6): 911. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/f13060911" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/f13060911</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>European Environment Agency (2017) Biogeographical regions in Europe. <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/biogeographical-regions-in-europe-2" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/biogeographical-regions-in-europe-2</ext-link> [Accessed 25 March 2026]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>EFSA [European Food Safety Authority] (2019) Update of the scientific opinion on the risks to plant health posed by <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> in the EU territory. EFSA Journal 17: 5665. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5665" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5665</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>EFSA [European Food Safety Authority] (2023) Pest survey card on <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic>. <ext-link xlink:href="https://efsa.europa.eu/plants/planthealth/monitoring/surveillance/xylella-fastidiosa" ext-link-type="uri">https://efsa.europa.eu/plants/planthealth/monitoring/surveillance/xylella-fastidiosa</ext-link> [Accessed 25 March 2026]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>EFSA [European Food Safety Authority] [Cavalieri V, Fasanelli E, Furnari G, Gibin D, Gutierrez Linares A, … Stancanelli G] (2026) Update of the <italic>Xylella</italic> spp. host plant database – Systematic literature search up to 31 December 2025. EFSA Journal 24(6): e10147. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10147" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10147</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>EPPO [European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization] (2020) PM 3/81 (2) Inspection of consignments for <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic>. EPPO Bulletin 50(3): 401–414. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/epp.12690" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12690</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>EPPO [European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization] (2023) PM 7/24 (5) <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic>. EPPO Bulletin 53: 205–276. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/epp.12923" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12923</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>European Commission (2013) Interpretation manual of European Union habitats – EUR 28. European Commission DG Environment, Brussels.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Falsini S, Campigli S, Faraoni P, Tani C, Rech V, … Marchi G (2025) Observations on <italic>Rhamnus alaternus</italic> naturally infected by <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> subsp. <italic>multiplex</italic> ST87 in the Mediterranean maquis of Monte Argentario (Tuscany, Italy). Plant Pathology 74(6): 1813–1829. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/ppa.14129" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.14129</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Fornace KM, Drakeley CJ, William T, Espino F, Cox J (2014) Mapping infectious disease landscapes: unmanned aerial vehicles and epidemiology. Trends in Parasitology 30(11): 514–519. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.pt.2014.09.001" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2014.09.001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Gallet F, Bioret B, Fichaut J, Sawtschuk J (2010) La phytosociologie, outil pertinent pour le suivi de la restauration écologique? Revue Forestière Française 62(3/4): 409–416. <ext-link xlink:href="10.4267/2042/38954" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/38954</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Gilbert GS (2002) Evolutionary ecology of plant diseases in natural ecosystems. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40: 13–43. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.021202.110417" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.021202.110417</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Godínez-Alvarez H, Herrick JE, Mattocks M, Toledo D, Van Zee J (2009) Comparison of three vegetation monitoring methods: their relative utility for ecological assessment and monitoring. Ecological Indicators 9(5): 1001–1008. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.11.011" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.11.011</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>ISPRA (2016) Manuali per il monitoraggio degli habitat di interesse comunitario (Direttiva 92/43/CEE). Manuale ISPRA 142/2016.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ (2003) Species-area relationships in Mediterranean-climate plant communities. Journal of Biogeography 30: 1629–1657. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00950.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00950.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>Kent M (2012) Vegetation description and data analysis: a practical approach, 2<sup>nd</sup> edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>Konatowska M, Rutkowski P (2019) Phytosociology — a useful tool for the assessment of past and future human impacts on plants and forest ecosystems. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines 7: 154–163. <ext-link xlink:href="10.4236/jbm.2019.711014" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2019.711014</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Köppen W (1936) Das geographische System der Klimate. In: Köppen W, Geiger R (Eds) Handbuch der Klimatologie, Vol. 1. Borntraeger, Berlin.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Kouadio L, El Jarroudi M, Belabess Z, Laasli SE, Roni MZK, … Lahlali R (2023) A review on UAV-based applications for plant disease detection and monitoring. Remote Sensing 15: 4273. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/rs15174273" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174273</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Lazzarotto A, Mazzanti R, Mazzoncini F (1964) Geologia del Promontorio Argentario (Grosseto) e del Promontorio del Franco (Isola del Giglio – Grosseto). Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana 83(2): 1–124.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <mixed-citation>Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271–280. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s004420100716" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100716</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <mixed-citation>Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Numerical ecology, 3<sup>rd</sup> edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <mixed-citation>Lengyel S, Déri E, Varga Z, Horváth R, Tóthmérész B, … Reiter K (2008) Habitat monitoring in Europe: a description of current practices. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 3327–3339. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10531-008-9395-3" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9395-3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <mixed-citation>Lloret F, Médail F, Brundu G, Camarda I, Moragues E, … Hulme PE (2005) Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands. Journal of Ecology 93: 512–520. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.00979.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.00979.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <mixed-citation>Lloret F, Escudero A, Iriondo JM, Martínez-Vilalta J, Valladares F (2012) Extreme climatic events and vegetation: the role of stabilizing processes. Global Change Biology 18: 797–805. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02624.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02624.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <mixed-citation>Marchi G, Rizzo D, Ranaldi F, Ghelardini L, Ricciolini M, … Surico G (2018) First detection of <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> subsp. <italic>multiplex</italic> DNA in Tuscany (Italy). Phytopathologia Mediterranea 57(3): 363–364.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <mixed-citation>Martellos S, Bartolucci F, Conti F, Galasso G, Moro A, … Nimis PL (2020) FlorItaly – the portal to the flora of Italy. PhytoKeys 156: 55–71. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/phytokeys.156.54023" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.156.54023</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56">
        <mixed-citation>McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 178–185. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57">
        <mixed-citation>Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B58">
        <mixed-citation>Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, … Wagner H (2023) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.6-4. <ext-link xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan" ext-link-type="uri">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B59">
        <mixed-citation>Pausas JG, Bradstock RA, Keith DA, Keeley JE (2004) Plant functional traits in relation to fire in crown-fire ecosystems. Ecology 85: 1085–1100. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1890/02-4094" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1890/02-4094</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B60">
        <mixed-citation>Perroy RL, Meier P, Collier E, Hughes MA, Brill E, … Keith LM (2022) Aerial Branch sampling to detect forest pathogens. Drones 6(10): 275. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/drones6100275" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6100275</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B61">
        <mixed-citation>Pesaresi S, Biondi E, Casavecchia S (2017) Bioclimates of Italy. Journal of Maps 13(2): 955–960. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/17445647.2017.1413017" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2017.1413017</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B62">
        <mixed-citation>Pielou EC (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology 13: 131–144. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B63">
        <mixed-citation>Pignatti S, Guarino R, La Rosa M (2017–2019) Flora d’Italia, 2<sup>nd</sup> edn. Edagricole – Edizioni Agricole di New Business Media, Bologna.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B64">
        <mixed-citation>QGIS Development Team (2024) QGIS geographic information system, version 3.42.0. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.qgis.org" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.qgis.org</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B65">
        <mixed-citation>Quattrini G, Pesaresi S, Lucchetti L, Hofmann N, Saiter F, … Casavecchia S (2025) Standardised drone procedures for phytosociological data collection. Applied Vegetation Science 28(2): e70032. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/avsc.70032" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.70032</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B66">
        <mixed-citation>R Core Team (2024) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.R-project.org/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.R-project.org/</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B67">
        <mixed-citation>Raunkiaer CC (1934) The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford University Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B68">
        <mixed-citation>Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1017/cbo9780511623387" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511623387</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B69">
        <mixed-citation>Saponari M, Boscia D, Nigro F, Martelli GP (2013) Identification of DNA sequences related to <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> in oleander, almond and olive trees exhibiting leaf scorch symptoms in Apulia (southern Italy). Journal of Plant Pathology 95: 668.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B70">
        <mixed-citation>Saponari M, Giampetruzzi A, Loconsole G, Boscia D, Saldarelli P (2019) <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> in olive in Apulia: where we stand. Phytopathology 109: 175–186. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1094/phyto-08-18-0319-fi" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-08-18-0319-fi</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B71">
        <mixed-citation>Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27(3): 379–423. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B72">
        <mixed-citation>Scortichini M (2026) Assessing the potential for modifying certain eradication measures for <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> subsp. <italic>pauca</italic> in olive groves of Apulia (Italy). Agriculture 16(2): 145. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/agriculture16020145" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16020145</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B73">
        <mixed-citation>SFR (2026) Servizio Fitosanitario Regionale Toscana. <ext-link xlink:href="https://fitosirt.regione.toscana.it/" ext-link-type="uri">https://fitosirt.regione.toscana.it/</ext-link> [Accessed on 14 February 2026]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B74">
        <mixed-citation>Sicard A, Zeilinger AR, Vanhove M, Schartel TE, Beal DJ, … Almeida RPP (2018) <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic>: insights into an emerging plant pathogen. Annual Review of Phytopathology 56: 181–202. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045849" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045849</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B75">
        <mixed-citation>Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/163688a0" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B76">
        <mixed-citation>Strumia S, Buonanno M, Aronne G, Santo A, Santangelo A (2020) Monitoring of plant species and communities on coastal cliffs: is the use of unmanned aerial vehicles suitable? Diversity 12: 149. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/d12040149" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/d12040149</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B77">
        <mixed-citation>Tjørve E (2009) Shapes and functions of species-area curves (II): a review of new models and parameterizations. Journal of Biogeography 36: 1435–1445. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02101.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02101.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B78">
        <mixed-citation>Tjørve E, Tjørve KM (2017) Species–area relationship. In: eLS. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/9780470015902.a0026330" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0026330</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B79">
        <mixed-citation>Turner W, Spector S, Gardiner N, Fladeland M, Sterling E, Steininger M (2003) Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 306–314. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00070-3" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00070-3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B80">
        <mixed-citation>Vacek S, Černý T, Vacek Z, Podrázský V, Mikeska M, Králíček I (2017) Long-term changes in vegetation and site conditions in beech and spruce forests of lower mountain ranges of Central Europe. Forest Ecology and Management 398: 75–90. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.foreco.2017.05.001" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.05.001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B81">
        <mixed-citation>Velasco-Amo MP, Landa BB, Pizarro-Tobías P, Trapero-Casas JL, Bejarano ER, … Navas-Cortés JA (2020) Resident bacterial microbiota in <italic>Olea europaea</italic> L. and its relationship with susceptibility or tolerance to <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> subsp. <italic>pauca</italic>. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 1168.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B82">
        <mixed-citation>Vennin S, Montpied P, Behr P, Thimonier A, Dupouey JL (2025) Mechanisation of forest operations drives long-term changes in plant communities. Forest Ecology and Management 585: 122562. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122562" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122562</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B83">
        <mixed-citation>Verdú M, Pausas JG (2007) Fire drives phylogenetic clustering in Mediterranean Basin woody plant communities. Journal of Ecology 95: 1316–1323. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01300.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01300.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B84">
        <mixed-citation>Viciani D, Dell’Olmo L, Foggi B, Ferretti G, Lastrucci L, Gennai M (2018) Natura 2000 habitat of Mt. Argentario promontory (southern Tuscany, Italy). Journal of Maps 14(2): 447–454. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/17445647.2018.1489903" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2018.1489903</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B85">
        <mixed-citation>Whittaker RH (1967) Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biological Reviews 42: 207–264. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1469-185x.1967.tb01419.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1967.tb01419.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="Additional information" id="sec28">
      <title>Additional information</title>
      <sec sec-type="Conflict of interest" id="sec29">
        <title>Conflict of interest</title>
        <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ethical statement" id="sec30">
        <title>Ethical statement</title>
        <p>No ethical statement was reported.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Artificial Intelligence (AI) use" id="sec31">
        <title>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</title>
        <p>AI-assisted language tools were used during the preparation of this manuscript for grammar checking and text refinement. All scientific content, data analysis, interpretation, and conclusions are entirely the responsibility of the authors.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Funding" id="sec32">
        <title>Funding</title>
        <p>This work was supported by Regione Toscana, Servizio Fitosanitario Regionale (<abbrev xlink:title="Regional Phytosanitary Service">SFR</abbrev>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author contributions" id="sec33">
        <title>Author contributions</title>
        <p>Conceptualization: AB, TL; Data curation: AB, TL, DO, SC, GM; Formal analysis: AB, TL, DO; Funding acquisition: LD; Methodology: AB, GM; Resources: LD; Visualization: DO, TL; Writing—original draft: AB, TL; Writing—review and editing: all authors.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author ORCIDs" id="sec34">
        <title>Author ORCIDs</title>
        <p>A. Bertacchi <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-3876" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-3876</ext-link></p>
        <p>D. Orazi <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6591-8427" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6591-8427</ext-link></p>
        <p>S. Campigli <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7231-535X" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7231-535X</ext-link></p>
        <p>G. Marchi <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2937-3500" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2937-3500</ext-link></p>
        <p>T. Lombardi <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0427-1820" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0427-1820</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data availability" id="sec35">
        <title>Data availability</title>
        <p>The vegetation dataset supporting the results of this study is available as Supplementary material (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: tables S1–S3, figs S1–S3).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <fn-group>
      <fn id="fntitle">
        <p>Topical Collection: “Advances in vegetation analysis through remote sensing technology”.</p>
      </fn>
    </fn-group>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/ved.197154.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">F68A4EB9-D3EB-5FE4-AE84-0BEC7CE56155</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Supplementary figures S1–S3 and tables S1–S3</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>zip</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="ved-63-001-s001.zip" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1790665.zip">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1790665</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Andrea Bertacchi, Diego Orazi, Sara Campigli, Guido Marchi, Lorenzo Drosera, Tiziana Lombardi</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
