Opinion Paper
Print
Opinion Paper
ITV-net: leveraging intraspecific trait variability to bridge vegetation science and trait-based research in Italy*
expand article infoAlessandro Bricca, Stefano Chelli§, Francesco Petruzzellis|, Giacomo Puglielli, Enrico Tordoni#
‡ Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bozen-Bolzano, Italy
§ University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| University of Padova, Padova, Italy
¶ University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
# University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
Open Access

Abstract

Vegetation science is a branch of community ecology that relies on species identities and abundance to classify vegetation in coherent units and to explore species coexistence and turnover dynamics. The advent of trait-based ecology has expanded vegetation science, providing a framework that allows for a better understanding of plant strategies and the functional structure of communities. These complementary disciplines have remained largely independent among Italian plant ecologists. Therefore, in 2021, we launched the ITV-net initiative, a national collaborative effort for bringing together vegetation plots and field-measured plant trait data to develop a national platform that can serve both vegetation and trait-based ecologists. In the first data call, we were able to gather trait data on two key leaf traits (i.e., Leaf Area and Specific Leaf Area) for >700 species across 1,043 georeferenced vegetation plots, complemented with species relative abundances, across eight different EUNIS habitat types. Despite this remarkable first milestone, we aim to enlarge the scope of this initiative to include more vegetation plots and functional traits across more habitat types in Italy. Here, we provide an overview of the ITV-net initiative and its underlying methodological details as a ‘manifesto’ to spread the data call to other potential contributors in the Italian community of plant ecologists. Our ultimate objective is to bridge the vegetation science and trait-based ecological research in Italy towards developing a national database of vegetation plots and plant functional traits. We believe this effort will contribute to building a solid network among Italian plant ecologists to cross the artificial boundaries of different, yet complementary, disciplines.

Keywords

Community ecology, functional traits, intraspecific trait variability, plant strategies, vegetation science

Vegetation science meets trait-based ecology

Vegetation science has changed profoundly in the last decades (Mucina 1997). The traditional Braun-Blanquet approach based exclusively on taxonomic diversity (species identities and their abundances) has been influenced by more recent conceptual and methodological advances, pushing vegetation scientists toward new frontiers (Chytrý et al. 2019; de Bello et al. 2025). The traditional taxonomic diversity approach is now routinely complemented with information on vegetation physiognomy, guilds, functional groups, and ecophysiology (Westoby 2025). Each species has measurable characteristics, i.e., traits, that are related to species performance and fitness maintenance and that ultimately govern ecological processes (Violle et al. 2007; Sobral 2021). In other words, following the nomenclature recently proposed by Westoby (2025), we are experiencing a shift in focus from ‘trait-free’ to ‘trait-based’ vegetation science (see also Zanzottera et al. 2021). This statement is further supported by the increasing number of articles (e.g., Bruelheide et al. 2018; Padullés Cubino et al. 2021; Kambach et al. 2023; Tordoni et al. 2024) that combine information from vegetation databases (e.g., EVA, Chytrý et al. 2016; sPlot, Sabatini et al. 2021) with trait databases (e.g., TRY; Kattge et al. 2020). However, the use of these large datasets often overlooks the role of intraspecific trait variation (ITV), since, for each species, the same average trait values are generally used in plots from different geographic locations. While this approach is extremely useful for drawing general patterns on regional and biogeographical scales (Bruelheide et al. 2018; Tordoni et al. 2022), it mostly allows top-down interpretations of ecological processes. A shift in focus to bottom-up perspectives requires generating datasets that combine the desirable features of large trait databases with information on ITV and species location, similar to other platforms already available online such as the BIEN database (https://bien.nceas.ucsb.edu/bien/).

Presenting ITV-net: A national initiative to bridge vegetation science and trait-based ecology

Plant ecological research in Italy is strongly rooted in ‘trait-free’ vegetation science and community ecology, and only recently have trait-based approaches begun to enrich the more classical ones (see Chelli et al. 2019 for a review). As a result, there is a potential pool of underlying data that, if appropriately harmonised, can provide a national platform to bridge vegetation science and trait-based research in Italy. To fill this gap, in 2021, we launched the ITalian Intraspecific Trait Variability Network (ITV-net), an initiative to bring together vegetation plots and trait data with a special focus on ITV. ITV-net already includes more than 20 research groups (>60 researchers) and data related to 8 habitat types across the Italian peninsula. So far, we have been able to gather >8,000 individual trait values of two traits (leaf area and specific leaf area), which represent two independent dimensions of the spectrum of leaf form and function (Wright et al. 2004; Poorter et al. 2009; Díaz et al. 2016; Wright et al. 2017), for >700 species in 1,043 georeferenced vegetation plots for which species abundance is also reported (Figure 1). Thanks to its design, the ITV-net dataset allows users to directly match trait values at the individual level with exact geographical locations and plot-level descriptors, providing the possibility to link trait values to abiotic (e.g., climatic information in a specific geographic location) and biotic (i.e., coexisting species) variables. In this respect, we believe that the ITV-net dataset combines the desirable properties of available trait databases, substantially mitigating many of their inherent limitations, especially the mismatch between trait values and species occurrences. The first version of the ITV-net dataset has been released as an open-access data source (Chelli et al. 2025a). However, this initiative is still in its infancy, since our ultimate objective is to expand the ITV-net dataset in terms of both species and traits collected across diverse habitat types in the Italian peninsula. For this reason, in the following sections we outline the underlying methodology of this initiative, the first results obtained, and point to some outlooks that will hopefully persuade more research groups to share their data through this emerging national hub.

Figure 1. 

Geographic distribution of ITV-net plots across Italy and its administrative regions.

The methodology of ITV-net

Species and trait data

The first set of data pertains to vegetation sampling. After defining the plot with a size defined based on the vegetation type (see van der Maarel 2005), all species within it are recorded along with their percentage of cover. Only taxa at species level are allowed. Further, since measuring all species within the plot is usually unfeasible (e.g., time limitations, presence of rare or protected species), measuring at least those species whose relative cover cumulatively accounts for approximately 80% of the total plot coverage represents a good practice to maintain high accuracy of trait information collected at the community level (Májeková et al. 2016). For example, given a plot with three species: species A (30%), species B (20%), and species C (5%), with a total cover of 55% deriving from the sum of species cover, the relative contribution of each species is calculated as follows: (30/55) × 100 = 54%, (20/55) × 100 = 36%, and (5/55) × 100 = 9%. In this case, it is enough to measure traits for only species A and species B, as their cumulative cover meet the 80% threshold considered in this database. This methodological approach is based on the ‘biomass-ratio hypothesis’ (Grime 1998), which suggests that the effect of species’ traits on ecosystems is proportional to their relative abundance (Pakeman and Quested 2007; Májeková et al. 2016).

Once the species are identified and their relative abundance is recorded, traits should be measured on an adequate number of replicates for each species to include the highest possible proportion of ITV according to widely recognized standardized measurement protocols (e.g., Perez-Harguindeguy et al. 2016; Freschet et al. 2021). For example, for woody species, 5 leaves from 5 individuals have been shown to be an optimal minimum sample size for leaf traits such as specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (π0) (Petruzzellis et al. 2017). However, this number could vary according to the life form and trait considered, and we always advise checking the appropriate sample size suggested in standardised protocols (e.g., Perez-Harguindeguy et al. 2016). For the ITV-net initiative, at least three independent measurements are required. These must be taken by three different individuals within the plot or, if necessary, from nearby areas if there are not enough individuals within the plot. For caespitose species, measurements should be taken from different tussocks, while for clonal species, more distant ramets are preferred to minimise the probability of sampling the same individual. However, in some cases, such as for root or clonal traits, we highly recommend following specific recently proposed protocols (Klimešová et al. 2019; Freschet et al. 2021).

We note that in the first data compilation, some datasets provided trait values at the individual level only for one plot, and the same trait value was then kept constant across sampled plots (i.e., extensive traits collection). While these kinds of data can still be useful depending on how trait values are aggregated (e.g., Puglielli et al. 2024), and are properly flagged in the ITV-net dataset (see Chelli et al. 2025b), for future developments we recommend that contributors provide trait values in each plot where a species occurs (i.e., intensive traits collection).

To ensure consistency in the species names recorded by different contributors, it is essential to standardize the nomenclature using a common checklist. Therefore, species names should be provided based on two sources: i) consulting the Portal to the Flora of Italy (https://dryades.units.it/floritaly/) following the national checklists for native and alien species; ii) the international checklist from the World Flora Online (https://www.worldfloraonline.org/) to guarantee a broader use of the database at international level. See Figure 2 for a summary of the required data.

Figure 2. 

Outline of the data and steps required to contribute to ITV-net.

Metadata

Auxiliary information at the plot level is pivotal to providing context to the trait values included in the ITV-net dataset. For this reason, during the first data compilation, we asked contributors to provide a set of plot-level information as follows:

Plot coordinates: Latitude and longitude data expressed in decimal degrees (datum WGS84) and recorded at the centre of the plot.

Plot size: expressed in m2. We do not provide exact values of the area since the choice could depend on the vegetation type considered. However, this information is essential, for instance, to control for the effect of plot size in statistical models (Sabatini et al. 2022).

Plot topographic information: We require providing information on elevation (m a.s.l.), slope (°), and aspect (°). Traits can show remarkable variation depending on the plot topography, providing key information to interpret associated trait records.

Sampling year: This information is key to addressing research questions on temporal trends of trait variation or to interpreting trait records sampled in years with peculiar climatic trends (e.g., extreme droughts such as during the year 2023).

Habitat type: There exist multiple classification systems to assign trait records to a specific habitat type. We decided to use a more general classification system, the first level of the EUNIS habitat classification (Chytrý et al. 2020). The EUNIS classification was preferred in view of extending the initiative beyond the Italian borders and allowing users from outside Italy to clearly identify the habitat types included in the dataset. The choice of level I is mostly related to the need to maximise the number of records per habitat type.

Management regime: plot management is essential to avoid potential confounding effects on trait records. For example, frequent grazing or burning might significantly change the species and trait composition of a community. If there is no management regime, contributors are encouraged to classify the plot as ‘natural’. In cases where multiple management regimes are present, the most common, or all of them, can be provided.

Status: For each species in the plot, contributors should indicate whether they are native (i.e., not introduced by humans) or non-native to Italy (neophytes vs. archaeophytes) according to the Portal to the Flora of Italy. If possible, also specify if native species have recently colonized the area due to human-induced environmental change (“neonative” species sensu Essl et al. 2019).

Notes: the previous points are far from providing an exhaustive list of metadata. For this reason, we encourage contributors to provide any additional metadata that can help to provide context to the associated trait records. Information in the Notes section might include information such as disturbance conditions, shading, whether the plot is part of a study of natural gradient or a manipulative experiment, or any other information that is considered relevant to interpreting the trait records.

Picture: At least one picture of the plot.

Dataset custodians: since the data contribution will be acknowledged by co-authorship of the articles produced under the ITV-net initiative, we limit the number of custodians to a maximum of three per dataset. This also allows us to match the datasets to the contributors for quality checks and updates.

We provide a template file reporting the headers of a potential data contribution file, and we encourage sending data to the itv.collaboration@gmail.com to contribute to the growth of the ITV-net dataset (Suppl. material 1).

Ongoing analyses under the ITV-net initiative

To date, several studies have shown that the magnitude of ITV with respect to total trait variation is not negligible (Lecerf and Chauvet 2008; Messier et al. 2010; de Bello et al. 2011; Siefert et al. 2015; Des Roches et al. 2018; Wong and Carmona 2021). The recognised importance of ITV has called for the development of practical and theoretical frameworks to account for ITV in trait-based studies (Albert et al. 2010; Albert et al. 2011; Moran et al. 2016; Wong and Carmona 2021). In this light, under the ITV-net initiative, we have already started to address three still unresolved issues related to the inclusion of ITV in trait-based studies.

First, most of the previous analyses calculated the magnitude of ITV trait by trait (Messier et al. 2010; Siefert et al. 2015) providing valuable insights on the traits or functions more or less prone to intraspecific variation, but missing a fundamental open issue in plant ecology, that is, whether the inclusion of ITV could affect the shape and dimensions of the functional space describing the spectrum of ecological strategies at the species or population levels. Indeed, plant ecological strategies are better described by multi-traits analyses, which allow us to highlight the main trade-offs underlying different plant ecological strategies (e.g., the Leaf Economic Spectrum, Wright et al. 2005), and to draw the spectrum of plant form and functions at the global level (Díaz et al. 2016). Recent studies showed that the inclusion of ITV could affect both trait–trait coordination, as some trait–trait relationships observed between species are not consistent within species, and trait space dimensionality, which could be potentially expanded when including ITV (Griffin-Nolan and Sandel 2023). However, these studies tested one trait dimension at a time, while plant ecological strategies are usually defined by a set of independent axes of trait variation (Westoby 1998; Laughlin 2023). In Puglielli et al. (2024), we provided a new framework for including ITV into trait space analyses to test whether the inclusion of ITV could reshape the trait space defined by two fundamental axes of the global spectrum of leaf form and function, i.e., leaf size and leaf mass per area, using a subset of the ITV-net dataset. We found that the inclusion of ITV affected both the dimension and the shape of the functional space, since ITV increased the variance explained by the two axes of trait variation, caused a rotation of these two axes, and altered the positioning of the species within the functional space. However, the magnitude of these effects was relatively small and, importantly, context dependent, varying according to the habitat considered (e.g., coastal dunes were the ones displaying the greatest ITV).

Another unresolved issue in plant ecology is when and how to consider ITV in trait-based studies. Ideally, ITV should be considered in every possible context, but measuring traits in many individuals per species and site is rarely done. Albert et al. (2011) provided a theoretical framework, based on the spatial variance hypothesis, whose core tenet is that ITV tends to saturate as the spatial scale of the study widens, while between-species trait variation increases with increasing spatial scale and saturates only at the global level. To date, only a few studies have tested this framework or the assumptions at the basis of the spatial variance hypothesis (e.g., Siefert et al. 2015), and a consensus is lacking. In this light, the second aim of the ITV-net initiative is to test the spatial variance hypothesis at three spatial scales (i.e., plot, habitat, and macro-area).

A third issue, still partially addressed in trait-based studies, is how ITV is integrated into the framework of assembly rules (Jung et al. 2010; Bricca et al. 2022; Ferrara et al. 2024). Assembly rules refer to mechanisms regulating species co-existence (Götzenberger et al. 2012). Over the years, research has identified several mechanisms that, acting on a species pool, progressively select only a set of species that are able to persist in a local plant community (de Bello et al. 2013). These mechanisms are generally interpreted in terms of the “habitat filtering theory” (Keddy 1992), stating that environmental conditions select only species with similar trait values that confer functional advantages under given conditions.

As such, the local plant community is composed of species with a higher degree of niche overlapping (i.e., similar trait values). However, other mechanisms can limit the similarity between coexisting species, especially those related to competitive exclusion. This is the case of the “limiting similarity theory” (MacArthur and Levins 1967). Environmental filtering and competition are not mutually exclusive, being the first more prominent at a large spatial scale and the latter at a more local scale. However, while these mechanisms have been widely assessed in the case of fixed traits, how intraspecific trait variation can be regulated by these mechanisms is still largely unknown. According to theoretical predictions (see Violle et al. 2012), at broad spatial scales, interspecific trait variation (or between-species trait variation) is expected to be larger than ITV, while ITV becomes more important as the study scale decreases. Broad-scale filters select species based on average trait values, whereas finer-scale filters select individuals within species expressing trait values that match local conditions. In this context, leveraging the database collected under the ITV initiative, we aim to disentangle the contribution of ITV when assessing community assembly rules across different habitats and spatial scales.

Future outlook on the integration of ITV with vegetation science

The ITV-net initiative represents a further step toward a complete integration of vegetation science and trait-based ecology, especially in the Italian research landscape. However, to enhance its ecological relevance, future efforts should prioritise the inclusion of traits representing additional dimensions of plant form and function, such as plant height, belowground traits related to fine root (e.g., specific root length, root tissue density; Freschet et al. 2021; Carmona et al. 2021) and main storage organ (e.g., belowground dry matter content; de Bello et al. 2012; Bricca et al. 2023), clonal traits (e.g, lateral spread; Chelli et al. 2024), and hydraulic traits (e.g., turgor loss point; Anderegg et al. 2016; Tordoni et al. 2020; Petruzzellis et al. 2021). These traits are fundamental for a more holistic understanding of resource acquisition, stress tolerance, and reproductive strategies, ultimately providing a more comprehensive assessment of functional characteristics and ecosystem processes. In particular, the focus on belowground plant compartments has been highlighted by vegetation scientists as a future challenge for the advancement of the field (Yannelli et al. 2022). Another crucial advancement for ITV-net is the incorporation of spatio-temporal variation in intraspecific trait variability. Plant traits are intrinsically dynamic, varying with phenological stages, seasonal shifts, and environmental variation (Puglielli and Varone 2018; Puglielli et al. 2019; Puglielli 2019; Carmona et al. 2021), and these aspects can be exacerbated by climate change (Griffin-Nolan et al. 2019; Pavanetto et al. 2025). Collecting data across seasons and years will shed light on how ITV mediates plant responses to changing climates and disturbances, providing a more nuanced view of plant strategies.

In conclusion, the ultimate goal of ITV-net is to evolve into a dynamic and scalable platform that will potentially integrate species characteristics with fine-scale information about communities. By especially encouraging contributions for under-represented locations or habitats and for traits not routinely included in trait-based studies, we seek to address key gaps in trait-based ecology and biodiversity research. Finally, the initiative can be exported outside the Italian borders, thereby increasing its overall scope.

References

  • Albert CH, Thuiller W, Yoccoz NG, Soudant A, Boucher F, … Lavorel S (2010) Intraspecific functional variability: Extent, structure and sources of variation. Journal of Ecology 98: 604–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01651.x
  • Albert CH, Grassein F, Schurr FM, Vieilledent G, Violle C (2011) When and how should intraspecific variability be considered in trait-based plant ecology? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 13: 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2011.04.003
  • Anderegg WRL, Klein T, Bartlett M, Sack L, Pellegrini AFA, … Jansen S (2016) Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought-induced tree mortality across the globe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 5024–5029. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525678113
  • Bricca A, Musciano MD, Ferrara A, Theurillat J-P, Cutini M (2022) Community assembly along climatic gradient: Contrasting pattern between- and within-species. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 56: 125675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2022.125675
  • Bricca A, Sperandii MG, Acosta AT, Montagnoli A, La Bella G, … Carboni M (2023) Above‐and belowground traits along a stress gradient: Trade‐off or not? Oikos 2023(9): e010043. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10043
  • Bruelheide H, Dengler J, Purschke O, Lenoir J, Jiménez-Alfaro B, … Jandt U (2018) Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2: 1906–1917. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0699-8
  • Chelli S, Marignani M, Barni E, Petraglia A, Puglielli G, … CeraboliniBEL (2019) Plant–environment interactions through a functional traits perspective: A review of Italian studies. Plant Biosystems 153: 853–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2018.1559250
  • Chelli S, Klimešová J, Tsakalos JL, Puglielli G (2024) Unravelling the clonal trait space: Beyond above-ground and fine-root traits. Journal of Ecology 112: 730–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14265
  • Chelli S, Bricca A, Petruzzellis F, Tordoni E, Calvia G, Acosta ATR … Puglielli G (2025a) ITV-net: A dataset of intraspecific leaf traits data across major Italian habitats. Plant Biosystems – An International Journal Dealing with All Aspects of Plant Biology, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2025.2531885
  • Chelli S, Bricca A, Petruzzellis F, Tordoni E, Calvia G, … Puglielli G (2025b) Dataset for: ITV-net: a dataset of intraspecific leaf traits data across major Italian habitats [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15642699
  • Chytrý M, Hennekens SM, Jiménez‐Alfaro B, Knollová I, Dengler J, … Yamalov S (2016) European Vegetation Archive (EVA): An integrated database of European vegetation plots. Applied Vegetation Science 19: 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12191
  • Chytrý M, Chiarucci A, Pärtel M, Pillar VD, Bakker JP, … White PS (2019) Progress in vegetation science. Journal of Vegetation Science 30: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12697
  • Chytrý M, Tichý L, Hennekens SM, Knollová I, Janssen JA, … Schaminée JHJ (2020) EUNIS Habitat Classification: Expert system, characteristic species combinations and distribution maps of European habitats. Applied Vegetation Science 23: 648–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12519
  • de Bello F, Lavorel S, Albert CH, Thuiller W, Grigulis K, … Lepš J (2011) Quantifying the relevance of intraspecific trait variability for functional diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2(2): 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00071.x
  • de Bello F, Janeček Š, Lepš J, Doležal J, Macková J, … Klimešová J (2012) Different plant trait scaling in dry versus wet Central European meadows. Journal of Vegetation Science 23(4): 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01389.x
  • de Bello F, Lavorel S, Lavergne S, Albert CH, Boulangeat I, … Thuiller W (2013) Hierarchical effects of environmental filters on the functional structure of plant communities: A case study in the French Alps. Ecography 36(3): 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07438.x
  • de Bello F, Fischer FM, Puy J, Shipley B, Verdú M, … Garnier E (2025) Raunkiæran shortfalls: Challenges and perspectives in trait‐based ecology. Ecological Monographs 95(2): e70018. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.70018
  • Des Roches S, Post DM, Turley NE, Bailey JK, Hendry AP, … Palkovacs EP (2018) The ecological importance of intraspecific variation. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2(1): 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0402-5
  • Díaz S, Kattge J, Cornelissen JHC, Wright IJ, Lavorel S, … Gorné LD (2016) The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529: 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16489
  • Essl F, Dullinger S, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, … Bacher S (2019) A conceptual framework for range-expanding species that track human-induced environmental change. Bioscience 69: 908–919. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz101
  • Ferrara A, Bricca A, Alberti D, Sabatini FM, Chiarucci A (2024) Elevation differentially shapes functional diversity patterns in understorey forest communities when considering intraspecific and interspecific trait variability. Journal of Vegetation Science 35: e13277. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.13277
  • Freschet GT, Pagès L, Iversen CM, Comas LH, Rewald B, … McCormack ML (2021) A starting guide to root ecology: Strengthening ecological concepts and standardising root classification, sampling, processing and trait measurements. New Phytologist 232: 973–1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17572
  • Götzenberger L, de Bello F, Brathen KA, Davison J, Dubuis A, … Zobel M (2012) Ecological assembly rules in plant communities-approaches, patterns and prospects. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 87(1): 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00187.x
  • Griffin-Nolan RJ, Sandel B (2023) Global intraspecific trait–climate relationships for grasses are linked to a species’ typical form and function. Ecography 2023: e06586. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.06586
  • Griffin-Nolan RJ, Blumenthal DM, Collins SL, Timothy E, Hoffman AM, … Knapp AK (2019) Shifts in plant functional composition following long-term drought in grasslands. Journal of Ecology 107: 2133–2148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13252
  • Kambach S, Sabatini FM, Attorre F, Biurrun I, Boenisch G, … Bruelheide H (2023) Climate-trait relationships exhibit strong habitat specificity in plant communities across Europe. Nature Communications 14: 712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36240-6
  • Kattge J, Bönisch G, Díaz S, Lavorel S, Prentice IC, … Wirth C (2020) TRY plant trait database–enhanced coverage and open access. Global Change Biology 26: 119–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14904
  • Keddy PA (1992) Assembly and response rules: Two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 3: 157–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235676
  • Klimešová J, Martínková J, Pausas JG, de Moraes MG, Herben T, … Ottaviani G (2019) Handbook of standardized protocols for collecting plant modularity traits. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 40: 125485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2019.125485
  • MacArthur R, Levins R (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. American Naturalist 101(921): 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1086/282505
  • Májeková M, Paal T, Plowman NS, Bryndová M, Kasari L, … de Bello F (2016) Evaluating functional diversity: Missing trait data and the importance of species abundance structure and data transformation. PLOS ONE 11: e0149270. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149270
  • Moran EV, Hartig F, Bell DM (2016) Intraspecific trait variation across scales: Implications for understanding global change responses. Global Change Biology 22: 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13000
  • Padullés Cubino J, Biurrun I, Bonari G, Braslavskaya T, Font X, … Chytrý M (2021) The leaf economic and plant size spectra of European forest understory vegetation. Ecography 44: 1311–1324. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05598
  • Pavanetto N, Tordoni E, Petruzzellis F, Maccherini S, Nardini A, … Bacaro G (2025) Effect of climate extremes and grazing on functional traits of a grassland community: Insights from a 20-year experiment. Annals of Botany 2025: mcaf059. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf059
  • Perez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, … Cornelissen JHC (2016) Corrigendum to: New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 64: 715–716. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT12225_CO
  • Petruzzellis F, Palandrani C, Savi T, Alberti R, Nardini A, Bacaro G (2017) Sampling intraspecific variability in leaf functional traits: Practical suggestions to maximize collected information. Ecology and Evolution 7: 11236–11245. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3617
  • Petruzzellis F, Tordoni E, Tomasella M, Savi T, Tonet V, … Bacaro G (2021) Functional differentiation of invasive and native plants along a leaf efficiency/safety trade-off. Environmental and Experimental Botany 188: 104518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104518
  • Puglielli G, Varone L (2018) Inherent variation of functional traits in winter and summer leaves of Mediterranean seasonal dimorphic species: Evidence of a ‘within leaf cohort’ spectrum. AoB Plants 10(3): ply027. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/ply027
  • Puglielli G, Varone L, Gratani L (2019) Diachronic adjustments of functional traits scaling relationships to track environmental changes: Revisiting Cistus species leaf cohort classification. Flora 254: 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2018.08.010
  • Puglielli G, Bricca A, Chelli S, Petruzzellis F, Acosta AT, … Tordoni E (2024) Intraspecific variability of leaf form and function across habitat types. Ecology Letters 27(3): e14396. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14396
  • Sabatini FM, Lenoir J, Hattab T, Arnst EA, Chytrý M, … Bruelheide H (2021) sPlotOpen–An environmentally balanced, open-access, global dataset of vegetation plots. Global Ecology and Biogeography 30(9): 1740–1764. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13346
  • Sabatini FM, Jimenez-Alfaro B, Jandt U, Chytry M, Field R, … Bruelheide H (2022) Global patterns of vascular plant alpha diversity. Nature Communications 13: 4683. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32063-z
  • Siefert A, Violle C, Chalmandrier L, Albert CH, Taudiere A, … Wardle DA (2015) A global meta-analysis of the relative extent of intraspecific trait variation in plant communities. Ecology Letters 18: 1406–1419. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12508
  • Tordoni E, Petruzzellis F, Nardini A, Bacaro G (2020) Functional divergence drives invasibility of plant communities at the edges of a resource availability gradient. Diversity 12(4): 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12040148
  • Tordoni E, Petruzzellis F, Di Bonaventura A, Pavanetto N, Tomasella M, … Bacaro G (2022) Projections of leaf turgor loss point shifts under future climate change scenarios. Global Change Biology 28: 6640–6652. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16400
  • Tordoni E, Carmona CP, Toussaint A, Tamme R, Pärtel M (2024) Global patterns and determinants of multiple facets of plant diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 33: e13823. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13823
  • van der Maarel E (2005) Vegetation Ecology – an overview. In: van der Maarel E (Ed.) Vegetation ecology. Blackwell Publishing, 1–51.
  • Violle C, Enquist BJ, McGill BJ, Jiang LIN, Albert CH, … Messier J (2012) The return of the variance: Intraspecific variability in community ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27(4): 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.014
  • Wong MKL, Carmona CP (2021) Including intraspecific trait variability to avoid distortion of functional diversity and ecological inference: Lessons from natural assemblages. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 12(5): 946–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13568
  • Yannelli FA, Bazzichetto M, Conradi T, Pattison Z, Andrade BO, … Sperandii MG (2022) Fifteen emerging challenges and opportunities for vegetation science: A horizon scan by early career researchers. Journal of Vegetation Science 33(1): e13119. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.13119
  • Zanzottera M, Dalle Fratte M, Caccianiga M, Pierce S, Cerabolini BEL (2021) Towards a functional phytosociology: The functional ecology of woody diagnostic species and their vegetation classes in Northern Italy. IForest 14: 522–530. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3730-014

* Topical Collection: “Bridging vegetation and trait-based ecological research”. Edited by Alessandro Bricca, Stefano Chelli, Francesco Petruzzellis, Giacomo Puglielli, Enrico Tordoni.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Template file reporting the headers of a potential data contribution file

Alessandro Bricca, Stefano Chelli, Francesco Petruzzellis, Giacomo Puglielli, Enrico Tordoni

Data type: xlsx

Explanation note: Occurences, plant traits, metadata.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (16.41 kb)
login to comment