Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Lorenzo Gianguzzi ( lorenzo.gianguzzi@unipa.it ) Academic editor: Claudia Angiolini
© 2025 Lorenzo Gianguzzi, Antonino La Mantia, Riccardo Rocca, Andrea Volpe, Salvatore Cambria.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Gianguzzi L, La Mantia A, Rocca R, Volpe A, Cambria S (2025) Fragments of subdesert vegetation in the Mediterranean Region: the Periploca angustifolia maquis (Periplocion angustifoliae, Quercetea ilicis) in Sicily. Vegetation Ecology and Diversity 62: e175232. https://doi.org/10.3897/ved.175232
|
The paper presents the results of a phytogeographic, ecological, phytosociological, and management-oriented study on the maquis vegetation dominated by Periploca angustifolia (class Quercetea ilicis) occurring along of southern coast of mainland Sicily. The species is a South-Mediterranean shrub, previously known in Europe only from some small islands surrounding Sicily (Linosa, Lampedusa, Pantelleria, and the Aegadian, and the Maltese Archipelagos), as well as from southeastern Spain and the Aegean islands of Crete, Khrisi, and Gavdos. Along with providing an updated overview of the species’ distribution, the study explores the historical reasons for its presence in Sicily, where it is part of a diverse group of biogeographically related species mainly found along the southern coasts. This further supports the hypothesis of connection routes contracted with North Africa during the drying of the Mediterranean in the Messinian period. Based on a synoptic comparison with similar associations present in the central-Mediterranean, the plant community investigated is proposed as a new syntaxon (association Asparago albi–Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov.), framed within the alliance Periplocion angustifoliae (order Pistacio–Rhamnetalia alaterni). Its role as a vicariant association with respect to the association Periploco angustifoliae–Euphorbietum dendroidis (occurring on the small islands of the Sicilian Channel) is also discussed, together with floristic, synecological, syndynamic, and conservation data. Finally, issues concerning afforestation with alien species—often carried out on a large scale throughout the Mediterranean area—are discussed, as such interventions may sometimes negatively affect ecosystems typical of endemic or particularly rare species. This is precisely the case of Periploca angustifolia in the study area, whose residual population had been brought to the brink of extinction by conifer plantations, leading to the alteration and consequent disappearance of its habitats.
Conservation, habitat fragmentation, Periplocion angustifoliae, relict Mediterranean maquis, semiarid ecosystems
The flora of Sicily—including the surrounding islands—is recognized as having considerable phytogeographical interest (
According to Plants of the World Online (
An additional record of the species has also been reported in Jordan at Wadi Rum (
In the eastern portion of its North African range, a gradual decline in populations has been documented, attributed by several authors mainly to anthropogenic pressures (
Other important pressures are also represented by the degradation and decline of its preferred habitats, due to agricultural expansion and infrastructure development by humans (
In this contribution, we first report the important discovery of a new population of the species in mainland Sicily, located on the southern slopes of Mount San Calogero (also known as Mount Kronio), in the municipality of Sciacca (Agrigento province). This discovery is indeed rather surprising, not only because the new site significantly expands the species’ range, but also due to its phytogeographical significance and the notable phytosociological and ecological value, including its potential future importance. Based on these premises, the results of a study are presented here, addressing the following objectives:
The new stand of Periploca angustifolia was found along the southern slopes of Mount San Calogero (397 m a.s.l.), a small hill that is part of a highly active volcanic region along the southwestern coast of Sicily (37°31'N – 13°6'E). About 60 km further southeast lies the submarine volcano Empedocles, which in 1831 gave rise to the island of Ferdinandea (or Graham Bank), later submerged following collapses caused by waves (
For this reason, an oriented nature reserve was established by the Sicilian Region (D.A. Territory and Environment No. 366/44 of 26/07/2000), covering 52.25 hectares, managed by the Department of Rural and Territorial Development (
The relief of Mount San Calogero consists of a rock outcrop of the Upper Triassic–Lower Lias (stromatolitic limestones with Megalodon of Late Triassic–Early Lias) (
This complex network of cavities and tunnels remains only partly explored due to its extreme conditions, including fluctuating temperatures (15–37 °C) and nearly 100% humidity (
From an ecological perspective, it remains unclear how these internal environmental conditions influence the external characteristics of the site (e.g., the temperature of lithological substrates and soils). Nevertheless, the presence of Periploca angustifolia and Searsia tripartita (
Moreover, from a geological perspective, this sector of Sicily has recently been considered by some authors as part of the foreland, similar to the Hyblaean area, whose territories may also have emerged (at least partially) after the deposition of pelagic carbonates, called “Trubi” (
From a climatic perspective, the mean annual precipitation is 564 mm, distributed over an average of 65 rainy days; precipitation peaks in winter, while a pronounced and prolonged minimum occurs during the spring–summer period (
From a biogeographical standpoint, the area is classified within the Mediterranean Region and the Central Mediterranean Subregion (
The land use of the Mount San Calogero area reflects a long history of human activity, from prehistoric therapeutic and religious visits to quarrying, agriculture, and afforestation. Historical toponyms such as Thermae Selinuntinae and Aquae Labodes attest to the region’s thermal heritage (
Today, much of the territory forms part of the Sciacca publicly owned Forest within a regional nature reserve managed by the Sicilian Forestry Service. Since 1988, afforestation—mainly with Pinus halepensis, Cupressus sempervirens, and Eucalyptus camaldulensis—has altered the original low maquis dominated by Periploca angustifolia. The area has suffered repeated wildfires, notably in 1997, leading to the loss of large, forested zones and recurrent vegetation degradation (
In the surrounding coastal belt, ongoing residential expansion has further transformed the landscape, encroaching toward borders of the protected area. Other land-use types are also notable in the adjacent coastal strip, where in recent decades, intense residential urban expansion has been recorded, approaching some parts of the aforementioned protected areas.
From a floristic and phytosociological viewpoint, the area was little known until now, except in general terms. In fact, the toponym “Sciacca at Monte S. Calogero” (or “Monte Kronio”) is scarcely mentioned in the most important classical floristic works, such as those by
For other taxa, some specifically listed in the Standard Form of the Natura 2000 site (
Indeed, among other geobotanical publications for this area, only a few reports can be be mentioned: the sites of the endemic Brassica villosa subsp. tineoi (
However, comprehensive monographic studies—both on the flora and the vegetation of this protected area—are still lacking. Such investigations would be highly desirable, particularly in light of recent and unexpected discoveries of species with North African affinities, including Searsia tripartita and Periploca angustifolia.
Periploca angustifolia is a shrubby liana belonging to the Apocynaceae family, reaching 2(–3) m in height and adapted to particularly hot and dry climatic conditions (see Suppl. material
a. Periploca angustifolia at Mt. S. Calogero (Sciacca, Italy): twigs in fruiting and dissemination (anemochory); b. Asparago albi-Periplocetum scrub, among the clearings of the afforestation; c. Follicles of P. angustifolia with nymphs of the host insect Caenocoris nerii (Lygaeidae); d. Other scrub areas along the firebreaks, on the south-eastern edge of Mount S. Calogero; e. Plant established in areas affected by fire; f. Scrub and grassland areas with Hyparrhenia hirta, colonizing the slopes denuded by the fires.
The study was conducted through preliminary field surveys, initiated at the beginning of spring 2025, following the incidental discovery of Periploca angustifolia by one the authors, documented by photographs posted on posted on the web (
For the geolithological characterization of the area, we mainly referred to
The geobotanical investigation was expanded to include a phytosociological, synecological, and syndynamic characterization of the vegetation landscape, with particular attention to the shrub formations of Periploca angustifolia, primarily established in clearings within afforested areas along the southwestern slope of the hill. Twelve phytosociological relevés were performed in spring, on homogeneous patches of low maquis-garrigue vegetation, although partly discontinuous and of limited extent. The sampled surfaces ranged between 50–100 m², at elevations between 143 and 278 m a.s.l. The relevés were then assembled into a phytosociological table (Table
Species identification was primarily based on
The communities reported in the above synoptic table were further classified through cluster analysis, in which frequency classes were converted into numerical values according to van der Maarel scale (1979). Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index. An agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm with Ward.D2 linkage was applied, minimizing within-group variance. NMDS (Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling) was used to graphically represent floristic relationships among the relevés in a two-dimensional space. Furthermore, a PERMANOVA (Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance) was carried out to test whether the studied associations differed significantly in composition, based on a Bray–Curtis distance matrix. Analyses were conducted with R software, version 4.5.1 (R Core 2025), using the “vegan” package (
Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov., Sciacca, Riserva M. S. Calogero, 13.05.2025 [rel. 1 (37.51505°N, 13.1007°E), 2 (37.51513°N, 13.10071°E), 3 (37.51491°N, 13.10235°E), 4 (37.51491°N, 13.10183°E), 5 (37.51569°N, 13.11134°E), 6 (37.51638°N, 13.10997°E), 7 (37.51667°N, 13.11056°E), 8 (37.51646°N, 13.10985°E)] and 19.05.2025 [rels. 9 (37.5168883°N, 13.1105639°E), 10 (37.5163093°N, 13.1111889°E), 11 (37.5155780°N, 13.1113448°E), 12 (37.5154315°N, 13.1116401°E)]. The values indicated in brackets concern species which were identified visually during field surveys performed during vegetative dormancy (dried leaf residues). The asterisk indicates the type relevé. The presence classes are as follows: I = 1–20%; II: 21–40%; III: 41–60%; IV: 61–80%; V = 81–100%.
| No. of relevé | 1 | 2 | 3* | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elevation (m a.s.l.) | 143 | 144 | 146 | 150 | 227 | 239 | 278 | 271 | 261 | 226 | 201 | 190 | P | R |
| Slope (°) | 11 | 15 | 15 | 12 | 20 | 15 | 22 | 25 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 15 | R | E |
| Aspect | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | E | Q. |
| Surface (m2) | 150 | 150 | 120 | 120 | 150 | 100 | 100 | 150 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 50 | S | |
| Total cover (%) | 95 | 100 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 100 | 85 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | E | C |
| Cover of the woody layer (%) | 85 | 90 | 80 | 90 | 90 | 80 | 75 | 85 | 70 | 75 | 85 | 80 | N | L |
| Cover of the herb layer (%) | 35 | 35 | 45 | 60 | 65 | 30 | 75 | 50 | 75 | 70 | 70 | 75 | C | A |
| Average height of the woody layer (m) | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.3 | E | S |
| No. of taxa | 31 | 34 | 35 | 31 | 25 | 24 | 30 | 23 | 24 | 23 | 22 | 24 | S | |
| Characteristic and differential association and alliance Periplocion angustifoliae (#) | ||||||||||||||
| #Periploca angustifolia (dom.) | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 12 | V |
| Asparagus albus | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | 12 | V |
| Ampelodesmos mauritanicus | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 3 | + | + | 1 | 12 | V |
| Carlina sicula subsp. sicula | 1 | + | 1 | + | . | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | . | 1 | 1 | 9 | IV |
| Pistacia terebinthus | . | 1 | 1 | . | 2 | 1 | 1 | . | . | + | 1 | . | 7 | III |
| Characteristic order Pistacio-Rhamnetalia alaterni and class Quercetea ilicis | ||||||||||||||
| Chamaerops humilis | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 12 | V |
| Olea europaea | 1 | + | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | + | 1 | . | 2 | 11 | V |
| Teucrium fruticans | 2 | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | + | + | . | + | 10 | V |
| Pistacia lentiscus | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | . | + | + | . | + | 1 | 1 | . | 9 | IV |
| Asparagus acutifolius | 1 | 2 | 1 | + | + | . | . | + | + | . | . | 1 | 8 | IV |
| Stachys major | . | + | . | + | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | . | + | . | + | 8 | IV |
| Ruta chalepensis | 1 | + | 1 | . | . | 2 | 1 | . | 1 | . | + | + | 8 | IV |
| Ceratonia siliqua (cult.) | . | 1 | 1 | . | . | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | . | 7 | III |
| Arisarum vulgare | . | (+) | (+) | . | . | . | (+) | . | (+) | . | (+) | + | 6 | III |
| Allium subhirsutum | (+) | (+) | . | (+) | . | . | . | . | . | (+) | . | + | 5 | III |
| Pinus halepensis (cult.) | . | . | . | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | 1 | . | 5 | II |
| Cytisus infestus subsp. infestus | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | 3 | II |
| Euphorbia dendroides | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | . | 3 | . | 2 | I | |
| Myrtus communis (cult.) | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
| Artemisia arborescens | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
| Cyclamen repandum | . | . | (+) | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
| Rubia peregrina | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
| Osyris alba | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
| Cercis siliquastrum (cult.) | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
| Other species | ||||||||||||||
| Hyparrhenia hirta | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | + | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | V |
| Asphodelus ramosus | (+) | (1) | (+) | (1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | (+) | (+) | . | (+) | (1) | 11 | V |
| Bituminaria bituminosa | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | + | 1 | 2 | 1 | + | . | 1 | + | 11 | V |
| Foeniculum vulgare subsp. vulgare | 1 | + | 1 | + | 2 | + | 2 | 1 | 1 | + | + | . | 11 | V |
| Stipellula capensis | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | + | . | + | + | . | . | 1 | 2 | 9 | IV |
| Andropogon distachyos | 1 | 1 | + | + | . | . | + | + | . | . | + | + | 8 | IV |
| Phagnalon saxatile | 1 | + | + | + | . | . | 1 | + | + | . | . | + | 8 | IV |
| Mercurialis annua | . | + | + | . | + | 1 | + | + | . | + | . | + | 8 | IV |
| Brachypodium distachyon | + | + | 1 | . | . | + | . | + | + | . | + | . | 7 | III |
| Spartium junceum (cult.) | + | 2 | 1 | . | . | . | 2 | 1 | 1 | + | . | . | 7 | III |
| Squilla pancration | (1) | (1) | . | (1) | . | (1) | . | . | (+) | (1) | . | (+) | 7 | III |
| Convolvulus altheoides | + | . | + | . | + | . | + | + | . | + | . | . | 6 | III |
| Pallenis spinosa | 1 | + | 1 | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | 6 | III |
| Eryngium campestre | 1 | + | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | 6 | III |
| Lathyrus clymenum | . | . | + | . | + | + | + | + | . | . | + | . | 6 | III |
| Dactylis glomerata subsp. hispanica | 1 | . | . | + | 1 | . | + | . | . | . | . | 1 | 5 | II |
| Acanthus mollis | (+) | . | . | . | (+) | . | . | . | (+) | (+) | . | . | 4 | II |
| Galactites tomentosus | . | + | . | . | . | + | . | . | + | . | . | + | 4 | II |
| Sonchus oleraceus | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | 4 | II |
| Fumana laevipes | 2 | 1 | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3 | II |
| Crupina crupinastrum | + | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | 3 | I | |
| Convolvulus cantabrica | . | + | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | 3 | I |
| Sideritis romana | . | + | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | + | . | . | 3 | I |
| Echium parviflorum | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | 3 | I |
| Urospermum dalechampii | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | I |
| Lantana camara | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | I |
| Micromeria graeca | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | 2 | I |
| Allium ampeloprasum | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | 2 | I |
| Capparis spinosa subsp. rupestris | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
| Allium commutatum | . | . | r | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
| Ononis viscosa subsp. breviflora | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
| Allium obtusiflorum | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
| Serapias cordigera | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
| Prunus dulcis (cult.) | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | . | . | 1 | I |
| Plantago afra | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 | I |
| Silene colorata | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 | I |
Simplified synoptic table of the Sicilian Region associations referred to the alliance Periplocion angustifoliae: 1 – Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae Gianguzzi, La Mantia et Cambria ass. nov., table 1; 2 – Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. typicum, Linosa Island (from
| Association table | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. relevés | 2 | 8 | 14 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 19 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 14 | 10 |
| Characteristic and differential species of associations | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ampelodesmos mauritanicus | V | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Carlina sicula subsp. sicula | IV | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Pistacia terebinthus | III | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | . |
| Euphorbia dendroides | I | V | V | V | III | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | . | 4 | 2 | III | V | IV | . | . | . | . |
| Euphorbia papillaris | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V | V | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Juniperus turbinata | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V | 4 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Brassica insularis | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 4 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Cytisus infestus subsp. infestus | II | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V | IV | III | . | . | . | . |
| Searsia pentaphylla | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Ephedra fragilis | . | . | . | . | II | I | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V | V | V | . | . |
| Retama raetam subsp. gussonei | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V | . | . |
| Characteristic of alliance Periplocion angustifoliae | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Periploca angustifolia | V | V | V | V | III | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | IV | 4 | 4 | . | . | . | . | . | . | V |
| Searsia tripartita | . | . | II | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 4 | V | V | . | . | . | . | |
| Lycium intricatum | . | V | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | II | 2 | . | V | V | V | . | . | |||
| Asparagus horridus | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | III | . | . | . | III | . | V | . | V | . | . | |
| Ziziphus lotus subsp. lotus | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V | . |
| Tetraclinis articulata | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V |
| Lycium schweinfurthii | . | . | III | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 4 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Characteristic of order Pistacio-Rhamnetalia alaterni | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pistacia lentiscus | IV | V | V | V | V | II | V | V | V | IV | V | III | V | 4 | 4 | V | . | V | V | III | . | III |
| Stachys major | IV | V | V | V | IV | . | V | V | IV | V | III | V | V | 4 | . | V | V | V | V | III | . | V |
| Olea europaea | V | III | II | IV | III | III | III | IV | I | II | II | IV | V | . | . | IV | V | . | . | . | II | V |
| Teucrium fruticans | V | . | . | V | II | V | IV | V | III | V | V | IV | V | . | . | V | V | . | . | . | . | V |
| Ceratonia siliqua | III | . | . | V | II | . | I | . | . | III | . | II | II | . | . | V | . | . | . | . | . | V |
| Rhamnus lycioides subsp. oleoides | . | . | . | . | IV | . | II | V | III | III | I | IV | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V |
| Clematis cirrhosa | . | III | . | II | III | I | . | . | . | . | . | I | II | . | . | II | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Asparagus albus | V | . | I | . | . | . | . | IV | . | . | . | V | . | . | . | III | V | . | . | . | I | . |
| Chamaerops humilis | V | . | . | . | . | . | . | IV | . | . | . | I | . | . | . | V | V. | . | . | . | . | . |
| Rhamnus alaternus | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | . | . | . | I | . | . | V | . | I | II |
| Myrtus communis | I | . | II | I | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Artemisia arborescens | I | . | . | . | III | I | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | II | . |
| Osyris alba | I | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | . |
| Characteristic of class Quercetea ilicis | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asparagus acutifolius | IV | III | V | V | V | I | V | V | V | . | V | III | V | . | . | V | I | IV | V | IV | IV | . |
| Rubia peregrina subsp. longifolia | I | II | V | IV | . | . | II | . | . | III | . | II | V | 3 | . | IV | III | IV | V | III | IV | V |
| Arisarum vulgare | III | III | . | . | V | III | II | V | . | III | II | II | II | . | . | V | . | . | I | V | V | IV |
| Ruta chalepensis | IV | IV | . | I | IV | I | IV | V | I | . | I | IV | . | . | . | III | V | . | . | . | I | . |
| Phillyrea latifolia | . | . | IV | I | . | I | II | III | I | . | II | . | III | 4 | . | III | . | V | . | . | . | . |
| Smilax aspera | . | . | III | . | . | . | . | . | . | IV | . | I | II | 1 | . | II | . | . | . | . | II | II |
| Asparagus aphyllus | . | IV | . | V | . | . | . | . | . | V | . | . | V | . | . | . | . | V | . | III | . | V |
| Lonicera implexa | . | . | III | . | IV | . | . | . | . | III | . | I | . | 3 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V |
The population of Periploca angustifolia on Mount S. Calogero (Sciacca) is mainly distributed across the lower and western sectors of the homonymous Nature Reserve (as well as SAC ITA040009), between the localities of Contrada Isabella, Cave di Pietra, and the easternmost part of the afforestation area (Fig.
Our surveys highlighted the presence of a particularly vigorous population of Periploca, with abundant fruiting and active anemochorous seed dispersal, as well as a rich presence of seedlings scattered throughout the area.
The first records of Periploca angustifolia in the Islands of the Sicilian Channel were provided by
Another specimen of the species collected by the same author must also be noted, preserved at the Palermo Herbarium (PAL63537!). It consists of three portions of twigs of the species, on the label of which-handwritten by Riccobono himself-appears the note: “Foresta Capaci – Cultivated. 4/25/1887, Riccobono.” This clearly indicates the origin of the sample, taken from a cultivated plant (in Contrada Carrubbella, where the toponym “Case Riccobono” still exists today).
In addition to this newly documented population on Mount S. Calogero, the current distribution of the species in the Sicilian Channel area—compiled from bibliographic references and unpublished data—includes the following additional localities:
- Marettimo island: Punta Bassana (
Table
Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae Gianguzzi, La Mantia et Cambria ass. nov.
Holotypus: Rel. 3, Table
Phytosociological data: Table
Diagnostic species: Periploca angustifolia (dominant), Asparagus albus, Ampelodesmos mauritanicus, Carlina sicula subsp. sicula, Pistacia terebinthus, Chamaerops humilis.
Short description: Primary or secondary low maquis, 2–3 m tall, more or less dense or open, occurring on xeric, rocky-stony slopes, with high frequency and sometimes dominance of Periploca angustifolia. It is associated with several elements of the alliance Oleo-Ceratonion siliquae and the order Pistacio lentisci–Rhamnetalia alaterni (e.g., Chamaerops humilis, Olea europaea, Pistacia lentiscus, Asparagus albus, Teucrium fruticans, Stachys major, as well as of the class Quercetea ilicis (e.g., Ampelodesmos mauritanicus, Asparagus acutifolius, Pistacia terebinthus, Arisarum vulgare, Allium subhirsutum).
Based on the data reported in Table
Substrates: Rocky calcareous and/or stony-debris slopes, edaphically poor or with shallow soils, occurring at the base of rock walls exposed to the South/South-East.
Bioclimate: Mediterranean oceanic pluviseasonal; lower thermomediterranean thermotype; lower dry ombrotype, tending toward semiarid conditions.
Syntaxonomic notes: The Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov. is framed within the alliance Periplocion angustifoliae (order Pistacio-Rhamnetalia alaterni, class Quercetea ilicis). The distribution area of the alliance comprises the various islands of the Strait of Sicily [where 10 different associations have been described, summarized in the synoptic table (Table
Vegetation series: In its most typical form, the association Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov. constitutes a garrigue or low maquis vegetation, acting as a transitional community linked to the following two xerophilous vegetation series: i) the Ruto chalepensis-Oleo sylvestris sigmetum is widespread on rocky carbonate substrates (
Scheme of the vegetation units co-occurring in the study area: (1) maquis with Periploca angustifolia (association Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov.); (2) perennial grassland with Hyparrhenia hirta (association Hyparrhenietum hirto-pubescentis); (3) afforestation with Pinus halepensis and Cupressus spp. (4) chasmophytic community (alliance Dianthion rupicolae); (5) maquis with Olea europaea (association Ruto chalepensis-Oleetum sylvestris).
Synchorology: The association is endemic to this portion of the southern Sicilian coast near Sciacca, representing a geographical vicariant of association Periploco-Euphorbietum dendroidis, which is found on several small islands of the Strait of Sicily (
The dendrogram resulting from the cluster analysis performed on the associations listed in the synoptic table (Table
Within the first group of this second cluster, two associations dominated by Searsia tripartita can be distinguished: the Calicotomo infestae-Rhoetum tripartitae (also restricted to Sicily and lacking Periploca angustifolia) and the Periploco angustifoliae-Rhoetum tripartitae (exclusive to the island of Linosa).
Cluster analysis of the communities belonging to Periplocion angustifoliae occurring in Sicily and nearby islands: Periplocion angustifoliae: 1 – Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov. 2 – Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. typicum, Linosa Island; 3 – Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. typicum, Pantelleria Island; 4 – Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. typicum, Lampedusa Island 5, 6 – Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. typicum, Marettimo Island; 7, 9 – Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. typicum, Levanzo Island; 8 – Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. typicum, Favignana Island; 10 – Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. typicum, Malta islands; 11 – Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. euphorbietosum papillaris, Levanzo Island; 12 – Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. euphorbietosum papillaris, Favignana Island; 13 – Periploco angustifoliae-Juniperetum turbinatae subass. typicum, Lampedusa Island; 14 – Periploco angustifoliae-Juniperetum turbinatae subass. brassicetosum insularis, Pantelleria Island; 15 – Periploco angustifoliae-Rhoetum tripartitae, Linosa Island; 16 – Calicotomo infestae-Rhoetum tripartitae, Southeastern Sicily; 17 – Calicotomo infestae-Rhoetum tripartitae, M. Kronio (Sciacca); 18 – Ephedro fragilis-Pistacietum lentisci, Gela at manfria; 19 – Ephedro fragilis-Pistacietum lentisci, Ragusa at Cava Randello; 20 – Asparago horridi-Retametum gussonei, Gela at Manfria; 21 – Asparago acutifolii-Ziziphetum loti, Palermo at Allaura; 22 – Asparago aphylli-Tetraclinetum articulatae, Malta islands.
The remaining associations are distributed across the other 9 groups, as follows:
Overall, it emerges that the most frequent and widely recognized syntaxon across the different islands of the Strait of Sicily—the association Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis—shows a certain floristic heterogeneity, splitting into different subclusters depending on geographical provenance. All other communities, on the other hand, tend to separate rather clearly from one another, owing to their markedly different floristic composition.
As for the Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov., it shows a certain autonomy compared to the other communities considered, displaying greater similarity with the aspects of Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. typicum found on Favignana Island (Aegadian Archipelago).
The NMDS analysis (Fig.
Regarding the Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov., also in this case it shows greater affinity with the relevés of Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis from the Aegadian Archipelago, geographically the closest.
Finally, the PERMANOVA analysis highlights significant differences in the floristic composition of the various communities investigated (F = 3.52; p < 0.001), confirming that the dissimilarities among the different associations are greater than their internal variability, and thus justifying the syntaxonomic treatment proposed.
According to some authors (
These conditions facilitated biogeographical exchanges and the dispersal of drought-adapted taxa (
Within this context, Periploca angustifolia represents a relict South-Mediterranean xerophyte, surviving today on Mount San Calogero under marginal ecological conditions. Its limited distribution likely reflects historical habitat loss and human disturbance, as well as intrinsic ecological constraints. The species serves as an indicator of infra- and thermo-Mediterranean semiarid to dry environments, although its narrow elevational range suggests vulnerability to even minor environmental changes.
The new population grows in a low shrubland, which has been proposed as a new syntaxon (Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov.), strictly endemic of this area, where it displays a clear relict character.
The new association is classified within the alliance Periplocion angustifoliae (order Pistacio-Rhamnetalia alaterni, class Quercetea ilicis). In agreement with various other authors (
The classification carried out through cluster analysis as well as NMDS highlighted its clear differentiation from the other associations of the alliance represented in this central-Mediterranean sector, apart from the Periploco-Euphorbietum dendroidis. Indeed, the new association is considered to act as vicariant with respect to the latter community, which is also marked by the frequency/dominance of Periploca angustifolia. However, the Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov. is clearly differentiated by its floristic assemblage, characterized by the presence of several significant species, such as Ampelodesmos mauritanicus, Carlina sicula, Pistacia terebinthus, Asparagus albus and Chamaerops humilis; the first three are completely absent, while the latter two are quite rare, in the other association of the small circum-Sicilian islands.
The distribution of the Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov. is concentrated on the south-western slope of Mount San Calogero, where it had so far escaped botanical and naturalistic observations; this despite the fact that the site lies within a protected area (namely the Natural Reserve “Monte San Calogero”, and also the Natura 2000 site ITA040009), apparently well known from a floristic point of view. Equally surprising is that a similar coincidence had already occurred in this area with Searsia tripartita, another very interesting xerophytic shrub of pre-desert vegetation, although found in a nearby locality (
On some individuals of P. angustifolia, we observed a notable presence of Caenocoris nerii (Germar, 1847 (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae)) (Fig.
These species, which are subject to pressures and threats, including afforestation interventions carried out in the area. These were implemented in past decades—partly even before the establishment of the natural reserve and the SAC—but it is evident that such interventions negatively interfered with native formations, almost completely erasing the relict patches of Periploca angustifolia shrublands (here classified to the association Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov.) and the even smaller patches of Searsia tripartita (in turn referred to the association Calicotomo-Rhoetum tripartitae;
Indeed, the new spaces opened up by fire have created clearings and grassland habitats more favorable to the Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae ass. nov., starting from the plants and small vegetation nuclei that had survived along hedges or at the margins of afforestations. This has led to an evident recovery of this shrub vegetation on the more xeric slopes, where the aforementioned community shows its climacic potential.
A comparable case to Periploca angustifolia is that of Ptilostemon greuterii, a Tertiary relict shrub endemic to northwestern Sicily and originally known from a single, very small population on Mount Inici (Raimondo and Domina 2006;
This case exemplifies how disturbance events, such as fire, can unexpectedly promote the resilience and regeneration of rare Mediterranean taxa when they restore natural habitat conditions, emphasizing the ecological importance of seed banks and habitat openness for relict and endemic species survival. These examples highlight the need for careful consideration, given the numerous afforestations efforts across Sicily and the Mediterranean—both historically and today—sometimes even in ecologically unique biotopes. Such interventions, often undertaken for hydrogeological protection or environmental restoration can disrupt native vegetation, alter ecosystem processes, and threat biodiversity. The popular notion of “planting a million trees to save the planet” is insufficient if actions lack scientific guidance and fail to use species suited to local ecosystems. Inappropriate afforestations can cause habitat regression, degradation, and loss of biodiversity, placing rare communities and endemic species at particular risk due to their heightened sensitivity to ecological changes (
In addition to reporting a new stand of Periploca angustifolia, so far unrecorded for mainland Sicily, this study provided an updated distribution of this interesting species, while also clarifying its synecological and phytosociological features. In agreement with the opinion of several authors, its presence at this specific site in Sicily is probably due to the ancient territorial connections with North Africa during the Messinian, when many species reached Sicily.
Finally, the newly described community Asparago albi–Periplocetum angustifoliae illustrates how fire can enhance the regeneration of rare Mediterranean taxa in areas impacted by improper afforestations. Therefore, this remark should be considered when formulating the conservation measures planned for this community within the “Monte San Calogero (Sciacca)” Natura 2000 site (SAC ITA040009). This is of particular importance also because it pertains to the priority habitat “5220* Matorral arborescent with Ziziphus,” which is listed in Annex I of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) due to its rarity and the need for strict protection.
Quercetea ilicis Br.-Bl. ex A. et O. Bolòs 1950
Pistacio lentisci-Rhamnetalia alaterni
Periplocion angustifoliae
Calicotomo infestae-Rhoetum tripartitae Bartolo, Brullo et Marcenò 1982
Asparago acutifolii-Ziziphetum loti Gianguzzi, Ilardi et Raimondo 1996
Ephedro fragilis-Pistacietum lentisci Brullo, Guarino et Ronsisvalle 2000
Asparago horridi-Retametum gussonei Brullo, Guarino et Ronsisvalle ex Brullo, Giusso, Siracusa et Spampinato 2001
Periploco angustifoliae-Juniperetum turbinatae Bartolo, Brullo, Minissale et Spampinato 1990
subass. typicum
subass. brassicetosum insularis Brullo, Gianguzzi, La Mantia et Siracusa 2009
Periploco angustifoliae-Rhoetum tripartitae Brullo, Gianguzzi, La Mantia et Siracusa 2009
Periploco angustifoliae-Euphorbietum dendroidis Brullo, Di Martino et Marcenò 1977
subass. typicum
subass. euphorbietosum papillaris Brullo, Gianguzzi, La Mantia et Siracusa 2009
Asparago aphylli-Tetraclinetum articulatae Brullo, Brullo C., Cambria et Giusso Del Galdo 2019
Asparago albi-Periplocetum angustifoliae Gianguzzi, La Mantia et Cambria ass. nov.
Conceptualization, L.G., A.L.M., S.C.; methodology, L.G., A.L.M., R.R., A.V., S.C.; investigation, L.G., A.L.M., R.R., A.V., S.C.; data curation, L.G., A.L.M., R.R., A.V., S.C.; data elaboration, L.G., A.L.M., S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, L.G., S.C.; writing—review and editing, L.G., A.L.M., R.R., A.V., S.C.; drawings, L.G. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.
This work was carried out with the financial support of the University of Palermo (FFR D13_001682, resp. L. Gianguzzi). The authors would especially like to thank Dr. Salvatore Carlino (Department of Rural and Territorial Development - Agrigento district, Sicilian Region) for the data pertaining afforestation and fire affecting the protected area, Prof. Haralabos Tsolakis (Dept. of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Italy) and Prof. Attilio Carapezza for the identification of Caenocoris nerii.
Taxonomic treatment and selected specimens examined
Data type: docx
Explanation note: The supplementary file includes the taxonomic treatment and selected specimens examined.