Data Paper |
|
Corresponding author: Gianmaria Bonari ( gianmaria.bonari@unisi.it ) Academic editor: Irena Axmanová
© 2025 Silvia Cannucci, Rossano Bolpagni, Gianmaria Bonari, Francesco Candini, Alice Dalla Vecchia, Emanuele Fanfarillo, Tiberio Fiaschi, Simona Maccherini, Francesco Mascia, Lorenzo Scalia, Claudia Angiolini.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Cannucci S, Bolpagni R, Bonari G, Candini F, Dalla Vecchia A, Fanfarillo E, Fiaschi T, Maccherini S, Mascia F, Scalia L, Angiolini C (2025) Dive into the Italian PONDY dataset: Pond vegetation data and water physico-chemical parameters. Vegetation Ecology and Diversity 62: e176891. https://doi.org/10.3897/ved.176891
|
Ponds are widespread yet highly vulnerable freshwater habitats that support diverse aquatic and terrestrial plant communities influenced by land use and water characteristics. The PONDY (Pond vegetation data and water physico-chemical parameters) dataset integrates vegetation and water physico-chemical data that have been collected to understand the responses of vegetation to environmental parameters. The dataset comprises 575 plots, of which 232 are aquatic and 343 are terrestrial, derived from 115 ponds across continental and insular areas of Italy. The dataset includes 743 vascular plant taxa and 5 macroalgae encompassing 364 genera and 89 families. Terrestrial plots host 690 taxa belonging to 87 families, while aquatic plots host 117 taxa belonging to 36 families. The dataset includes 10 taxa belonging to the Italian Red List and 39 alien species. Moreover, 11% of the aquatic plots have been classified in a Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC habitat type, while 48% have been classified in a EUNIS habitat type. The dataset contains, for each plot, measurements of physico-chemical water variables such as dissolved oxygen, water depth, and temperature, pH, turbidity, conductivity, and nutrient concentration. The PONDY dataset provides comprehensive information on plant diversity and abundance, community composition, habitat types, and water chemistry in Italian ponds, serving as a key resource for studying plant–environment relationships, developing predictive models, and supporting freshwater conservation efforts.
Aquatic vegetation, physico-chemical parameters, ponds, pondscape, vegetation data
Ponds offer vital resources and living spaces for a wide range of both aquatic and terrestrial organisms (
Pond vegetation is typically composed of wetland plants, including emergent species that are rooted in the sediment but extend their vegetative parts above the water, and aquatic plants, which include submerged species with entirely underwater leaves, along with rooted floating and free-floating types (
Accessible datasets are key tools for providing an overview of species and habitat distribution, and they support biodiversity conservation actions by highlighting the occurrence of species of conservation interest or alien species (
The study area (Fig.
All ponds were sampled during the peak of the growing season. Specifically, ponds in the continental areas of Italy were surveyed between June and August 2020, 2021, and 2023, those in insular Italy in late April 2024. In each plot, we recorded all the occurring species, including vascular plants and macroalgae of the Characeae family. Vascular plant species nomenclature follows the
The dataset includes 575 georeferenced vegetation plots (232 aquatic and 343 terrestrial) including 743 vascular plant taxa and 5 macroalgae. The species richness of plots varies between one to 40, with 443 (64.2%) plots having less than 10 species and 121 (17.5%) plots having 20 or more taxa (Fig.
The dominant life forms are Hemicryptophytes (39%) and Therophytes (37%) in terrestrial plots and Hemicryptophytes (35%) and Hydrophytes (20%) in aquatic plots. Chamaephytes are the least frequent life form in both plot types (Suppl. material
The dataset contains a total of 39 alien species, mostly found in terrestrial plots, 33 of which are categorised as invasive in Italy (Table
Threatened taxa, their statuses from the Italian Red List, and major threats (
| Species | Status | Major threats |
| Baldellia ranunculoides | Endangered (EN) | 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 11 |
| Butomus umbellatus | Vulnerable (VU) | 7, 8, 9, 11 |
| Carex microcarpa | Near Threatened (NT) | 1, 2, 7 |
| Hottonia palustris | Endangered (EN) | 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
| Leucojum aestivum subsp. aestivum | Vulnerable (VU) | 5, 7 |
| Plagius flosculosus | Endangered (EN) | 1, 2, 4, 7, 8 |
| Ranunculus cordiger subsp. diffusus | Endangered (EN) | 2, 7 |
| Ranunculus ophioglossifolius | Vulnerable (VU) | 2, 4, 6, 7, 9 |
| Thelypteris palustris | Vulnerable (VU) | 7, 8, 9 |
| Zannichellia palustris | Near Threatened (NT) | 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11 |
The alien species present in this dataset and their associated status (
| Species | Neophyte/ Archaeophyte | Status | Plot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acalypha virginica | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Acer negundo | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Amaranthus blitoides | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Amaranthus cruentus | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Amaranthus retroflexus | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Amorpha fruticosa | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Arundo donax | Archaeophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Avena strigosa | Neophyte | Casual | Terrestrial |
| Bidens connata | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Bidens frondosa | Neophyte | Invasive | Aquatic |
| Cyperus strigosus | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Erigeron annuus | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Erigeron bonariensis | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Erigeron canadensis | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Erigeron sumatrensis | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Eucalyptus camaldulensis | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Euphorbia humifusa | Neophyte | Naturalized | Terrestrial |
| Galinsoga parviflora | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Hesperocyparis arizonica | Neophyte | Naturalized | Terrestrial |
| Humulus japonicus | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Lemna aequinoctialis | Neophyte | Naturalized | Aquatic |
| Lemna minuta | Neophyte | Invasive | Aquatic |
| Lindernia dubia | Neophyte | Invasive | Aquatic |
| Ludwigia hexapetala | Neophyte | Invasive | Aquatic |
| Oenothera stucchii | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Oxalis pes-caprae | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Panicum capillare | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Panicum dichotomiflorum | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Parthenocissus quinquefolia | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Paspalum distichum | Neophyte | Invasive | Aquatic |
| Sicyos angulatus | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Solidago gigantea | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Sorghum halepense | Archaeophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Symphyotrichum lanceolatum | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Symphyotrichum squamatum | Neophyte | Invasive | Aquatic |
| Trifolium alexandrinum | Neophyte | Naturalized | Terrestrial |
| Verbena bonariensis | Neophyte | Naturalized | Terrestrial |
| Veronica persica | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
| Xanthium spinosum | Neophyte | Invasive | Terrestrial |
Graphics showing species richness per plot (A), the five most frequent families in terrestrial plots (B), the five most frequent families in aquatic plots (C), the five most abundant genera in terrestrial plots (D), the five most abundant genera in aquatic plots (E), the ten most frequent taxa in terrestrial plots (F), and the ten most frequent taxa in aquatic plots (G).
Overall, we classified 64 aquatic plots (11%) under a Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC habitat type and 275 plots (48%; based on Suppl. material
Classification of the vegetation plots according to EUNIS habitat types. Only habitats occurring in more than 3% of plots classified in the given habitat are reported. The complete table is provided in Suppl. material
| EUNIS | No. plots | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh-water small pleustophyte vegetation (P3b) | 32 | 5.6 |
| Fresh-water submerged vegetation (P3d) | 18 | 3.1 |
| Fresh-water nymphaeid vegetation (P3e) | 24 | 4.2 |
| Stonewort vegetation (P3h) | 39 | 6.8 |
| Tall-helophyte bed (Q51) | 96 | 16.7 |
| Helophyte beds (Qb) | 36 | 6.3 |
The dataset includes key parameters describing physical aspects, water chemistry, and trophic indicators (Fig.
The information present in the PONDY dataset strengthens the knowledge of pond plant diversity along insular and continental Italy. This dataset, which provides comprehensive data on plant species, community composition, habitat types, and physico-chemical water parameters, is important for understanding the plant diversity hosted in these freshwater systems and studying its relationship with physico-chemical water parameters. This dataset can be the base for future studies on the relationships between plant communities and environmental conditions and can be used for developing predictive models for species distribution based on chemical parameters. Furthermore, in the future, the dataset might be expanded with functional trait data to provide an assessment of functional composition of plant communities in relation to water chemistry. Additionally, it can contribute to define conservation status of lentic systems by assessing conservation indices, similarly to the ECELS index used in Catalonia (
The vegetation plot data are available in the CircumMed database (GIVD: EU-00-026 - CircumMed database https://www.givd.info/ID/EU-00-026).
SC and RB collected the data in the field with contributions from CA, EF, TF, and FM. SC, CA, RB, and SM designed the sampling plan. SC and RB identified vascular plant species with contributions from FM and TF. TF identified Charophyceae species. ADV performed the chemical analysis in the laboratory. SC and RB assembled the dataset with contribution from LS. FC performed the semi-automatic habitat EUNIS classification. SC did the analyses. SC led the writing with contributions from GB. SC prepared the figures with contributions from GB. CA and GB supervised the research. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version.
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Silvia Cannucci, Emanuele Fanfarillo, Claudia Angiolini, Simona Maccherini, and Gianmaria Bonari were funded under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.4 - Call for tender No. 3138 of 16 December 2021, rectified by Decree n.3175 of 18 December 2021 of Italian Ministry of University and Research funded by the European Union – NextGenerationEU; Award Number: Project code CN_00000033, Concession Decree No. 1034 of 17 June 2022 adopted by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, CUP B63C22000650007, Project title “National Biodiversity Future Center - NBFC”. Rossano Bolpagni benefited from the equipment and framework of the COMP-R Initiative, funded by the ‘Departments of Excellence’ program of the Italian Ministry for University and Research (MUR, 2023–2027) and is partially funded under the NRRP, Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.4, funded by the European Union – NextGenerationEU; Call for tender: Project code CN_00000033, CUP B63C22000650007, Project title “National Biodiversity Future Center - NBFC”, Cascading grant call by Spoke 3 “Assessing and monitoring terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity and its evolution: from taxonomy to genomics and citizen science”, Project title “development of the Italian MAcrophytes Database (iMAD)”. Alice Dalla Vecchia is currently funded by a MSCA-Global-2023 fellowship DIVE IN “Predicting DIVErsity of INvasive aquatic plants” (GA No. 101147317).
We thank Giovanni Rivieccio for the logistics and Jacopo Cristoni for his contribution to sampling and characterization of ponds.
Suppl. figures and tables
Data type: docx
Explanation note: figure S1: Spatial representation of the sampling design followed, spanning (a) the regions, (b) the selection of pondscapes, (c) the selection of ponds, and (d) the localisation of vegetation plots (2 m × 2 m) within each pond. A = aquatic plot, T = terrestrial plot. figure S2: Examples of ponds of the three pondscapes: (a) High agricultural land-use extent pondscape (Monastir, Sud Sardegna, Italy); (b) Low agricultural land-use extent pondscape (Montieri, Grosseto, Italy); (c) Intermediate agricultural land-use extent pondscape (San Venanzio, Modena, Italy). Photo credits: (a, b) S. Cannucci; (c) R. Bolpagni. figure S3: Number of different life forms for both the terrestrial and aquatic plots. table S1: Classification of the vegetation plots according to EUNIS habitat types. table S2: Summary statistics of environmental parameters measured across the plots of the studied ponds.