Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Irene Menegaldo ( irmenegaldo@unibz.it ) Academic editor: Maria Adamo
© 2025 Irene Menegaldo, Victoria Mølbach Sforzini, Roberto Tognetti, Michele Torresani.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Menegaldo I, Mølbach Sforzini V, Tognetti R, Torresani M (2025) Tree line dynamics and forest densification in the European Alps revealed by Landsat images and machine learning: a case study in the Senales/Schnals Valley. Vegetation Ecology and Diversity 62: e177152. https://doi.org/10.3897/ved.177152
|
The alpine tree line represents one of the most climate-sensitive ecological boundaries, where multiple interacting factors determine vegetation distribution at its upper limit. This study investigates the spatio-temporal dynamics of the tree line in the Senales Valley (South Tyrol, Italy) between 1985 and 2023, combining multi-temporal Landsat imagery, Random Forest (RF) classification, and visual orthophoto interpretation performed by manually delineating the forest boundary to assess both spatial and elevational shifts. Climatic variables (temperature, precipitation, snow cover, and growing season length) were analysed using linear models (LM) and generalized additive models (GAM) to identify long-term trends and potential drivers of tree line migration. The results reveal a consistent increase in forest cover in all 16 study areas, averaging +44%, with the largest expansions occurring on slopes facing W. Elevational advances were recorded in 15 of 16 areas, averaging +32 m for Landsat-derived data and +45 m for orthophotos. Elevated minimum temperatures during spring and autumn, alongside warmer summers and a significant rise in precipitation during the same season, created conditions which maintained soil moisture and reduced water stress—factors known to facilitate tree line advancement. Wind exposure from the N-NW sector and associated föhn effects appeared to limit tree line expansion on S-SE facing slopes. Comparison between manual and RF-derived tree lines revealed overall high agreement, with deviations below one Landsat pixel (30 m) in most cases. This confirms that Landsat imagery combined with RF algorithms provides a robust, cost-effective method for assessing long-term tree line dynamics in heterogeneous alpine environments.
Climate change, Landsat, Random Forest classification, remote sensing, topographic factors, tree line dynamics
The alpine tree line ecotone is described as the transition zone that leads from a closed montane forest to the treeless alpine meadows (
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating Landsat time-series data with ML techniques to monitor tree line dynamics and to identify the climatic and topographic drivers influencing these dynamics in the alpine region, using the Senales Valley (South Tyrol, Italy) as a case study. This study investigates the extent to which treeline positions derived from Landsat time-series using machine-learning classification align with those obtained from orthophoto visual analysis, how long-term variations in temperature, precipitation and length of growing season relate to the observed treeline dynamics, and to what extent topographic factors (elevation, slope, aspect) influence the rate and spatial patterns of treeline shifts.
The area of interest is located in the N-W corner of the autonomous province of Bolzano – South Tyrol, Italy, and corresponds to the Senales municipality that covers the entire Senales valley, 46°42'N–10°55'E (Fig.
Overview of the 16 selected study areas in the Senales valley, South Tyrol, Italy. The different aspects and steepness are marked with different colors. The base map is an RGB orthophoto acquired in June 2023 (original resolution = 0.2 m) provided by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol (Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol, 2024).
Within the Senales valley, 16 smaller study areas (500 m × 600 m each) were selected as the basis for the analysis (Fig.
This categorization resulted in eight possible combinations (four possible aspects, N, E, S, W, and a slope steepness below or above 30°). Based on these criteria, 16 areas were selected in total, ensuring that each set of topographic criteria was represented twice.
For this analysis, we used a Landsat 5 (TM) image from August 29, 1985, and a Landsat 8 (OLI) image from July 2, 2022, both on path 193, row 027. They were downloaded as Level-2 data, which means that they had already been atmospherically corrected to save time and avoid user errors (U.S. Geological Survey
| Data type | Acquisition date | Source | Spatial resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multispectral satellite data | 29/08/1985 | Landsat 5 (Path/Row = 193/027), https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ | 30 m |
| 02/07/2022 | Landsat 8 (Path/Row = 193/027), https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ | 30 m | |
| DTM | May 2005, Accessed on October 2, 2024 | Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol, https://geokatalog.buergernetz.bz.it | 2.5 m |
| Orthophotos | 1982–1985 | Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol, https://geokatalog.buergernetz.bz.it | 1 m |
| 2023 | Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol, https://geokatalog.buergernetz.bz.it | 0.2 m |
Once the satellite images were collected, they were processed using the Semi-Automatic Classification plugin (SCP) (
The meteorological daily data from 1981 to 2023 were provided by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol through the official Weather South Tyrol platform (Weather South Tyrol
with th = +2 °C
Since SWE values are derived from a single meteorological station and it is not possible to apply a robust interpolation method that accounts for elevation gradients due to the lack of a sufficiently dense station network (
In the following section, we report the results of the multi-temporal classification and tree line elevation analysis, emphasizing spatial and elevational shifts across different topographic aspects. These findings are complemented by an evaluation of long-term climatic trends in temperature, precipitation, snow cover, and length of the growing season, providing an integrated understanding of the environmental factors driving vegetation dynamics and tree line development in the Senales valley.
The results of the Landsat image classification are presented for years 1985 and 2022, respectively (Table
Accuracy assessments of the RF classifications from year 1985 and 2022. The values were collected from the accuracy assessment performed using the Semi-Automatic Classification plugin (SCP) in QGIS (version 3.24.1- Tisler). PA = Producer’s Accuracy; UA = User’s Accuracy.
| Landsat image (year) | Forest PA (%) | non-Forest PA (%) | Forest UA (%) | non-Forest UA (%) | Overall accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 97.65 | 99.19 | 98.85 | 98.57 | 98.65 |
| 2022 | 98.06 | 98.72 | 99.15 | 97.55 | 98.11 |
The classified Landsat images from 1985 and 2022 provide an overview of the response of tree line dynamics in the Senales valley over a period of 37 years. In all 16 study areas, an increase in forest cover was detected between 1985 and 2022, both considering Landsat satellite images and orthophotos (Fig.
The pixel analysis shows a heterogeneous spatial shift in forest cover in the 16 study areas (Table
An overall elevational advancement of the tree lines can be seen in 15 of the 16 study areas based on the Landsat classifications (Table
For tree lines derived directly from orthophotos from 1982/85 and 2023, only advancements were registered (Table
A comparison between the two data sets (Table
Examples of tree lines derived from RF classification from Landsat 5 and 8 (1a, 2a, 3a, 4a) and manual delineation based on orthophotos (1b, 2b, 3b, 4b) for the years 1985 (yellow line) and 2022 (red line) for the four different aspects. The background image is an orthophoto from 1982/85 (original resolution = 1 m) provided by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol (Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol, 2024).
Forest cover in the study areas for the years 1985 and 2022 (A) derived from the classification performed on Landsat satellite images. The ranking shows areas with the largest to smallest shift registered between the two years. The shift is indicated in hectares (for the single year) and percentages (the difference between years). Mean elevations for the points created with a 30 m distance along lines (B). The study areas are ranked from largest to smallest elevational shift (in meters). Exposition of the study areas is indicated by colours: Orange = W; Pink = S; Green = E; Blue = N.
| A – Change (%) in Forest Cover | B – Elevational Shift of the tree line (m) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Area | 1985 (ha) | 2022 (ha) | ∆ (%) | Study Area | 1985 (m) | 2022 (m) | ∆ (m) |
| W2 A30 | 9.81 | 19.98 | +103.7 | W4 B30 | 2234.44 | 2303.97 | +69.53 |
| W4 B30 | 8.19 | 16.56 | +102.2 | W2 A30 | 2159.42 | 2216.38 | +56.96 |
| S3 B30 | 6.66 | 12.6 | +89.2 | W3 B30 | 2150.75 | 2200.40 | +49.65 |
| S4 B30 | 6.48 | 10.71 | +65.3 | E2 A30 | 2246.05 | 2289.58 | +43.53 |
| W1 A30 | 11.16 | 17.91 | +60.5 | S3 B30 | 1987.63 | 2029.99 | +42.36 |
| S2 A30 | 13.59 | 19.8 | +45.7 | S2 A30 | 2234.66 | 2275.21 | +40.55 |
| N4 B30 | 13.14 | 18.09 | +37.7 | W1 A30 | 2159.48 | 2194.68 | +35.20 |
| W3 B30 | 8.28 | 11.34 | +37.0 | E3 B30 | 2225.72 | 2258.14 | +32.42 |
| N3 B30 | 8.1 | 10.62 | +31.1 | E1 A30 | 2147.95 | 2177.04 | +29.09 |
| E3 B30 | 15.21 | 18.99 | +24.8 | N4 B30 | 2200.84 | 2227.68 | +26.84 |
| E4 B30 | 15.66 | 19.08 | +21.8 | N1 A30 | 2286.17 | 2308.07 | +21.90 |
| E1 A30 | 13.68 | 16.65 | +21.7 | E4 B30 | 2252.73 | 2272.69 | +19.96 |
| N2 A30 | 9.63 | 11.43 | +18.7 | S4 B30 | 2181.55 | 2198.48 | +16.93 |
| E2 A30 | 17.91 | 21.15 | +18.1 | N3 B30 | 2214.50 | 2231.33 | +16.83 |
| N1 A30 | 15.66 | 18.8 | +16.1 | S1 A30 | 2149.02 | 2162.23 | +13.21 |
| S1 A30 | 11.88 | 13.59 | +14.4 | N2 A30 | 2258.83 | 2252.64 | -6.19 |
| Average change | +44.3 | Average shift | +31.2 | ||||
Tree lines deriving from Landsat images (left) and orthophotos (right). Study areas are ranked by largest to smallest elevational shift from orthophotos. The far-right column shows differences between datasets: positive values indicate larger advance in orthophotos, negative values larger advance in Landsat. Largest differences (>30 m) are highlighted in red.
| Source: Landsat | Source: Orthophotos | Difference (m) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Area | 1985 (m a.s.l) | 2022 (m a.s.l) | ∆ Elevation (m) | Study Area | 1982/85 (m a.s.l) | 2023 (m a.s.l) | ∆ Elevation (m) | |
| W1 A30 | 2159.48 | 2194.68 | +35.20 | W1 A30 | 2105.66 | 2205.92 | +100.26 | +65.06 |
| W2 B30 | 2159.42 | 2216.38 | +56.96 | W2 A30 | 2149.01 | 2236.98 | +87.97 | +31.01 |
| N2 A30 | 2258.83 | 2252.64 | -6.19 | N2 A30 | 2234.33 | 2311.15 | +76.82 | +83.01 |
| W4 B30 | 2234.44 | 2303.97 | +69.53 | W4 B30 | 2238.44 | 2298.53 | +60.09 | -9.44 |
| W3 B30 | 2150.75 | 2200.40 | +49.65 | W3 B30 | 2159.04 | 2217.85 | +58.81 | +9.16 |
| E2 A30 | 2246.05 | 2289.58 | +43.53 | E2 A30 | 2263.61 | 2317.46 | +53.85 | +10.32 |
| S4 B30 | 2181.55 | 2198.48 | +16.93 | S4 B30 | 2158.94 | 2209.82 | +50.88 | +33.95 |
| N1 A30 | 2286.17 | 2308.07 | +21.90 | N1 A30 | 2280.58 | 2321.37 | +40.79 | +18.89 |
| S3 B30 | 1987.63 | 2029.99 | +42.36 | S3 B30 | 1994.31 | 2034.02 | +39.71 | -2.65 |
| S2 A30 | 2234.66 | 2275.21 | +40.55 | S2 A30 | 2259.10 | 2297.58 | +38.48 | -2.07 |
| N3 B30 | 2214.50 | 2231.33 | +16.83 | N3 B30 | 2207.75 | 2237.47 | +29.72 | +12.89 |
| E3 B30 | 2225.72 | 2258.14 | +32.42 | E3 B30 | 2240.94 | 2268.32 | +27.38 | -5.04 |
| E4 A30 | 2252.73 | 2272.69 | +19.96 | E4 A30 | 2270.47 | 2293.64 | +23.17 | +3.21 |
| S1 A30 | 2149.02 | 2162.23 | +13.21 | S1 A30 | 2162.56 | 2179.02 | +16.46 | +3.25 |
| E1 A30 | 2147.95 | 2177.04 | +29.09 | E1 A30 | 2198.92 | 2206.70 | +7.78 | -21.31 |
| N4 B30 | 2200.84 | 2227.68 | +26.84 | N4 B30 | 2215.05 | 2217.91 | +2.86 | -23.98 |
| Average shift | +31.2 | Average shift | +44.69 | +12.98 | ||||
This section details the climatic trends for temperature, precipitation, and derived variables from 1981 to 2023, to understand the possible climatic drivers in the upward shifting of the tree line.
The annual mean temperature over the considered period shows a significant trend (p-value < 0.01), indicating that the temperature pattern is not linear (Fig.
Regarding seasonal precipitation, only summer experienced a significant increase in the last 37 years, with +1.62 mm per year, resulting in a total increase of approximately 60 mm during the studied period (Fig.
Finally, we identify the potential start and end of the growing season alongside the cumulative depth of snow, measured as SWE (mm). No significant trends were detected in any of these variables, particularly regarding the growing season length, which is intrinsically linked to both its start and end dates. In addition, the depth of the snow did not show a discernible trend during the study period, reflecting a pattern characterized by high variability and a lack of consistent directional change. This behaviour appears to be closely associated with the stochastic nature of total precipitation throughout the considered time period (Suppl. material
Seasonal mean maximum and minimum temperature trends between 1981 and 2023 for spring (A), summer (B), autumn (C), and winter (D). Points represent observed temperature values, lines show trends estimated using GAM and LM, and shaded areas indicate GAM confidence intervals. Orange = Maximum temperature; Green = Mean temperature; Blue = Minimum temperature.
This study demonstrates that the combined use of satellite data from the Landsat program and ML algorithms can play a key role in ecological research that addresses land-cover changes on large spatial and temporal scales. Integration of historical aerial imagery further supports and improves classification accuracy, providing valuable context for long-term landscape dynamics. The combination of Landsat data, GIS, and the RF algorithm has been successfully used for other LULC assessments (
The observed temperature and precipitation trends are in line with those of
The aspect also seems to have a considerable impact on the different magnitudes of the upward shift of the tree line. In agreement with the study by
We are aware that working with intermediate coarse resolution satellite data in areas of complex topography and vegetation cover can lead to ambiguous results in the classification, as smaller variations are not detectable. Therefore, in a mountainous area, scarce tree cover in the tree line ecotone can cause errors or misinterpretations (
This study provides a comprehensive assessment of tree line dynamics in the Senales Valley over the past four decades, demonstrating the potential to integrate satellite-based RS and ML algorithms to assess ecological responses to climate change in alpine regions. The observed upward tree line shift, particularly pronounced on W-facing slopes, highlights the influence of local topography and climatic variability on vegetation patterns. Among climatic factors, the increase in minimum temperatures during spring and autumn appears to be a key driver of tree line advancement, because it potentially stretches the growing season and decreases the possibility of frost stress. The concurrent rise in summer precipitation paired with an increase in temperatures during the same season likely mitigated drought-related conditions that could have slowed the advancement. In contrast, strong föhn-type winds on S- and SE-facing slopes could have restricted upward expansion, highlighting the interplay between thermal and mechanical stress. The comparison between orthophotos and Landsat-based RF classifications confirmed the high reliability of this approach, with deviations typically below one pixel, supporting its suitability for long-term tree line monitoring. Future studies should integrate field surveys, finer resolution datasets, and historical land use information to better unravel the relative roles of climatic and anthropogenic factors shaping the alpine forest boundaries.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Irene Menegaldo: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Victoria Mølbach Sforzini: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Roberto Tognetti: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Conceptualization. Michele Torresani: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Conceptualization.
During the preparation of this work, the authors utilized AI software (ChatGPT) to enhance the phrasing, spelling, and grammar of the manuscript. After employing this tool, the authors reviewed and edited all content as necessary and assumed full responsibility for the content of the publication.
MT and RT are partially funded by the “MAP-Rezia” (ID 0200061) project within the Interreg VI-A Italy-Switzerland Programme.
We are grateful to the Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and appreciation, which helped improve the manuscript. This work was supported by the Open Access Publishing Fund of the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.
Suppl. table and figures
Data type: pdf