Research Article
Print
Research Article
Tree line dynamics and forest densification in the European Alps revealed by Landsat images and machine learning: a case study in the Senales/Schnals Valley*
expand article infoIrene Menegaldo, Victoria Mølbach Sforzini, Roberto Tognetti§, Michele Torresani§
‡ Free University of Bolzano/Bozen, Bolzano/Bozen, Italy
§ Competence Centre for Plant Health, Bolzano, Italy
Open Access

Abstract

The alpine tree line represents one of the most climate-sensitive ecological boundaries, where multiple interacting factors determine vegetation distribution at its upper limit. This study investigates the spatio-temporal dynamics of the tree line in the Senales Valley (South Tyrol, Italy) between 1985 and 2023, combining multi-temporal Landsat imagery, Random Forest (RF) classification, and visual orthophoto interpretation performed by manually delineating the forest boundary to assess both spatial and elevational shifts. Climatic variables (temperature, precipitation, snow cover, and growing season length) were analysed using linear models (LM) and generalized additive models (GAM) to identify long-term trends and potential drivers of tree line migration. The results reveal a consistent increase in forest cover in all 16 study areas, averaging +44%, with the largest expansions occurring on slopes facing W. Elevational advances were recorded in 15 of 16 areas, averaging +32 m for Landsat-derived data and +45 m for orthophotos. Elevated minimum temperatures during spring and autumn, alongside warmer summers and a significant rise in precipitation during the same season, created conditions which maintained soil moisture and reduced water stress—factors known to facilitate tree line advancement. Wind exposure from the N-NW sector and associated föhn effects appeared to limit tree line expansion on S-SE facing slopes. Comparison between manual and RF-derived tree lines revealed overall high agreement, with deviations below one Landsat pixel (30 m) in most cases. This confirms that Landsat imagery combined with RF algorithms provides a robust, cost-effective method for assessing long-term tree line dynamics in heterogeneous alpine environments.

Keywords

Climate change, Landsat, Random Forest classification, remote sensing, topographic factors, tree line dynamics

Introduction

The alpine tree line ecotone is described as the transition zone that leads from a closed montane forest to the treeless alpine meadows (Körner 2003). The transition is not always represented by a sharp line, but rather by a vegetational shift gradient (Körner and Paulsen 2004; Gruber et al. 2022), which inevitably marks the line above which trees cannot survive (Nagy et al. 2003). The structure and ecological processes that regulate the position of the tree line are highly complex, making it a fragile ecological transition zone, where many species live in conditions close to their ecological limits (Cudlín et al. 2013). Due to this inherent fragility, even subtle changes in environmental conditions can trigger marked ecological responses. Consequently, the treeline ecotone functions as a sensitive system for assessing ecosystem responses to climate change (Mountain Research Initiative EDW Working Group 2015; Camarero et al. 2021; Dial et al. 2022). Numerous studies have assessed the advancement of the tree line in the European Alps and in various regions around the world (Leonelli et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2021; Gruber et al. 2022; Tourville et al. 2023). Being mostly limited by cold temperatures (Paulsen and Körner 2014), treelines experience faster warming rates compared to other ecotones that do not experience such extreme conditions (Bhatt et al. 2010; IPCC 2023), which could trigger rapid advancement (Grace et al. 2002). The most recent global meta-analysis on tree line dynamics proposed by Hansson et al. (2021) states that 66% of tree lines around the world have seen an increase in elevational or latitudinal extent. This implies that the tree line ecotone responds differently to increasing temperatures because it is a complex system shaped by multiple interacting drivers. These factors create site-specific combinations of limitations for the establishment of new individuals, yet they also reveal broader patterns that can be used to describe tree line dynamics at regional and global scales (Lischke et al. 2006; Case and Duncan 2014). In addition, changes in the precipitation regime could lead to significant changes in tree line dynamics. However, the role of precipitation and related soil moisture supply has remained less clear compared to the more predictable trend of temperatures throughout vast regions. This may be due to the significant impact of regional and local variations, especially in heterogeneous topographic mountain areas (López-Moreno et al. 2009; Holtmeier and Broll 2020). In alpine areas, the duration of snow cover, which is strictly correlated with winter temperatures, can critically affect seedling establishment, survival, and growth (Barbeito et al. 2013; Carrer et al. 2019). In addition, many tree lines are increasingly influenced by seasonal drought. The impact of heat deficiency and drought often overlaps, leading to drought periods (linked with periods that lack sufficient precipitation) that can overrule the positive effects of climate warming (Choat et al. 2018; Timoney et al. 2018; De Boer et al. 2019). Topography seems to be another limiting factor driving tree line spatial patterns, both on a local (Carmel and Kadmon 1999) and at landscape level (Tourville et al. 2023). Upward shifting is not spatially uniform due to specific microclimate disparities that could favor or prevent seedling establishment (Zheng et al. 2021; Zhou et al. 2021). Considering regional magnitude, trees growing on N-facing slopes tend to experience colder temperatures but also have a lower risk of photoinhibition due to less direct solar irradiation (Smith et al. 2003). Trees on aspects exposed to high winds tend to suffer increased cold-related tissue damage and icing, whereas less exposed trees may be more protected by increased snow cover (Holtmeier and Broll 2012). Recent advances in remote sensing (RS) techniques have become essential tools for analysing land changes on a large scale (Lang and Wegner 2019; Pham et al. 2024) and in remote areas (Curtis et al. 2018; He et al. 2025), facilitating data acquisition, and providing data in a continuous manner. RS technology can also be used to assess ecological changes such as biodiversity loss (Rossi et al. 2024; Torresani et al. 2025) and vegetation dynamics (Perrone et al. 2024; Rocchini et al. 2024; Torresani et al. 2024b). The Landsat program provides the longest continuous satellite global coverage since 1972 (Irons et al. 2012; NASA 2024), acquiring multispectral imagery at moderate resolution. The broad availability of extensive datasets led Landsat to be widely used for land change detection (see, e.g., (Ouchra et al. 2023; Das and Prasad 2025; Gatti et al. 2025)). The application of machine learning (ML) algorithms has significantly improved land cover and land change classification efforts (Sylvain et al. 2019; Chieffallo et al. 2025), due to their ability to process large volumes of data while maintaining high accuracy in identifying patterns and drivers of forest loss and expansion in satellite imagery. Among the various ML algorithms, Random Forest (RF) has demonstrated strong predictive capabilities to classify different land cover types, with extensive empirical support from global case studies (Mehmood et al. 2024; Shahzad et al. 2024). Furthermore, RF effectively models complex, non-linear relationships in ecological data (Hussain et al. 2024; Feng et al. 2025). Consequently, there has been growing interest in the combined use of RS and ML algorithms, resulting in a rising number of studies monitoring large-scale changes in forest cover (Datta et al. 2022; Yuh et al. 2023; Mahapatra et al. 2025). Although significant advances in the understanding of tree line dynamics through multispectral RS time series (Chhetri and Thai 2019; Baglioni et al. 2025), and despite evidence that environmental conditions determine tree line distribution at regional level (Bonanomi et al. 2018), a direct comparison between machine-learning-based treeline detection and manual delineation is still lacking – especially when accounting for climate-derived variables such as growing season length, which can strongly regulate tree establishment, recruitment, and growth near the upper forest limit. Therefore, it is relevant to investigate whether this combination can lead to meaningful results when monitoring the dynamics of tree lines in the alpine region.

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating Landsat time-series data with ML techniques to monitor tree line dynamics and to identify the climatic and topographic drivers influencing these dynamics in the alpine region, using the Senales Valley (South Tyrol, Italy) as a case study. This study investigates the extent to which treeline positions derived from Landsat time-series using machine-learning classification align with those obtained from orthophoto visual analysis, how long-term variations in temperature, precipitation and length of growing season relate to the observed treeline dynamics, and to what extent topographic factors (elevation, slope, aspect) influence the rate and spatial patterns of treeline shifts.

Methods

Site description

The area of interest is located in the N-W corner of the autonomous province of Bolzano – South Tyrol, Italy, and corresponds to the Senales municipality that covers the entire Senales valley, 46°42'N–10°55'E (Fig. 1). The Senales valley branches out from the Venosta valley and covers an area of approximately 210 km2 with the lowest point being at the beginning of the valley, 824 m a.s.l., and the highest peak being at Similaun at 3607 m a.s.l. (Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol 2024). The orientation of the valley is mostly N-W, with a smaller side valley, the Pfosser valley, stretching toward the NE. Based on measurements from the meteorological station in Vernagt/Vernago (Weather South Tyrol 2024), the Senales valley experienced an annual precipitation mean of 713 mm during the period 1981–2023 with a mean of 129 days of precipitation per year. Most of the precipitation occurs during the spring and summer months from April to August. The annual mean temperature registered from 1981 to 2023 for the valley was 5.5 °C. Among the main tree species that can be found at the tree line level in this valley is European larch (Larix decidua Mill.). In the Senales valley, the larch makes up the forest stands all the way up to the tree line on mountain faces with S and W exposure, where it receives more light during sun hours, while on N- and E-exposed slopes, the forest composition is more mixed. Another tree species found in the area is Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembra L.). Here, it can primarily be found on N- and E-exposed slopes towards the tree line. It is considered one of the best adapted trees to withstand cold climates (Caudullo and de Rigo 2016). Patches of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H.Karst.) and broadleaved species are found at lower elevations in the montane zone.

Figure 1. 

Overview of the 16 selected study areas in the Senales valley, South Tyrol, Italy. The different aspects and steepness are marked with different colors. The base map is an RGB orthophoto acquired in June 2023 (original resolution = 0.2 m) provided by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol (Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol, 2024).

Data collection

Within the Senales valley, 16 smaller study areas (500 m × 600 m each) were selected as the basis for the analysis (Fig. 1 and Suppl. material 1). Selection of the Senales valley was guided by representing treeline-shift dynamics in the South-Tirol region, the presence of a proximal meteorological station providing reliable climatic data, and the availability of Landsat scenes with minimal cloud cover. The areas selection was then based on three topographic criteria: elevation, aspect, and steepness derived from the Digital Terrain Model (DTM) of the Senales valley (Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol 2024).

  • Elevation: Areas were selected within a consistent elevation range to capture the tree line ecotone. The target range was 1800–2400 m a.s.l., as the tree line in the central Alps generally lies within this interval (Körner 2003).
  • Aspect: The selected areas covered different slope orientations. A classification in the four cardinal directions (N, E, S, and W) was used to represent this variation.
  • Steepness: A slope threshold was applied to distinguish between gentler and steeper areas.
  • The threshold was set at 30°, which marks the division between hilly slopes (15°–30°) and moderately steep slopes (30°–45°) according to the USDA slope classification (United States Department of Agriculture 2009).

This categorization resulted in eight possible combinations (four possible aspects, N, E, S, W, and a slope steepness below or above 30°). Based on these criteria, 16 areas were selected in total, ensuring that each set of topographic criteria was represented twice.

Remote sensing application: data used and data elaboration

For this analysis, we used a Landsat 5 (TM) image from August 29, 1985, and a Landsat 8 (OLI) image from July 2, 2022, both on path 193, row 027. They were downloaded as Level-2 data, which means that they had already been atmospherically corrected to save time and avoid user errors (U.S. Geological Survey 2024). In addition, a DTM and two orthophotos (from 1982/85 and 2023) were provided by the Province of Bolzano. Description of the data (acquisition date, source, and resolution) can be found in Table 1.

Table 1.

Overview of the remote sensing data.

Data type Acquisition date Source Spatial resolution
Multispectral satellite data 29/08/1985 Landsat 5 (Path/Row = 193/027), https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ 30 m
02/07/2022 Landsat 8 (Path/Row = 193/027), https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ 30 m
DTM May 2005, Accessed on October 2, 2024 Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol, https://geokatalog.buergernetz.bz.it 2.5 m
Orthophotos 1982–1985 Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol, https://geokatalog.buergernetz.bz.it 1 m
2023 Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol, https://geokatalog.buergernetz.bz.it 0.2 m

Once the satellite images were collected, they were processed using the Semi-Automatic Classification plugin (SCP) (Congedo 2021) in QGIS (version 3.24.1-Tisler (QGIS Development Team 2022)). The bands were stacked into two separate rasters, one containing the Landsat 5 bands and one containing the Landsat 8 bands (Suppl. material 1). The training areas were manually labelled in each study area and assigned to one of the two classes created in our case Forest and Non-Forest (containing grasslands, bare rock, and urban areas). Then, based on the training areas, each pixel in the multispectral image was categorized into the created classes, grouping together pixels based on their spectral signatures (n° of pixel for Forest class = 2633, n° of pixel for non-Forest class = 2246). Among the different algorithms available, the RF algorithm was selected, keeping the default number of trees at 10 and enabling the balanced weight class’s function, as the number of pixels within the training areas for each class was not identical. For every pair of study areas with the same criteria (aspect + slope + year), the same training dataset was used. For each training set, we used 8 training areas for the Forest class and 8–12 areas for the non-Forest class, the latter chosen to capture the wider environmental variability of this class. This sampling strategy ensured a balance between computational efficiency and adequate representation of environmental conditions across the study area. Classification accuracy was assessed using the area-based error matrix method (Olofsson et al. 2014) implemented in the SCP plugin. This approach provides unbiased estimates of user’s, producer’s and overall accuracy. Accordingly, the accuracy of the RF algorithm was evaluated for all Landsat images and for both classes using these unbiased metrics. Furthermore, a pixel analysis of the classification layers was performed to calculate the total forest area within each study area for two years, where the total amount of pixels and the number of pixels corresponding to the forest were counted. This was repeated for the 16 areas for the years 1985 and 2022, and the results were compared. Following the classification, the tree line drawing was performed manually in QGIS separately for each year. First, the tree lines were drawn using the RF classifications for both years. Afterwards, tree lines were drawn directly on orthophotos from 1982/85 and 2023. Since the orthophotos did not have the same spatial resolution, the one from 2023 was down sampled from 20 cm to 1 m to match the resolution of the 1982/85 aerial image. The orthophoto used for 1982/85 is a composite of images from the Autonomous Province of Bolzano, collected between 1982 and 1985 and subsequently merged. Although there is no indication of which specific areas were photographed in which year, we assumed that, at tree line level within our study sites, no major biotic or abiotic disturbances occurred that would have disrupted the continuity of forest cover. After delineating the tree line, points were generated every 30 m along the lines, each carrying elevation information extracted from the underlying DTM. The mean elevation of all points was then calculated, and the results were compared between manual and ML classification. When the positions of the study areas were selected during data preparation, the polygons used did not align perfectly with the pixels of the Landsat images and therefore also contained cut pixels. This resulted in study areas of slightly different size, ranging from 304 to 340 pixels of 30 m resolution, since only complete pixels were included in the classification and following processes. For this reason, only the percentage shift in forest cover will be used for the final comparison.

Meteorological data

The meteorological daily data from 1981 to 2023 were provided by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol through the official Weather South Tyrol platform (Weather South Tyrol 2024). In the Senales valley, a meteorological station is located in Vernagt/Vernago at 1700 m a.s.l., providing both temperature and precipitation records. Although monthly precipitation data have been available since 1953 and monthly temperature data since 1967, the daily dataset was preferred in this study, as it fully covers the study period and allows for a more detailed analysis of climatic trends that could have influenced tree line dynamics. The station was located at an average distance of approximately 5 km from all study sites, with the farthest site 10 km away (coordinates: WGS84 (EPGS: 4326) 46.735658°N, 10.84928°E). Therefore, it was considered the closest and most representative source of climatic data for the study area. Climatic trends were identified using a combination of linear models (LM) and generalized additive models (GAM), performed in R (R Core Team 2014) with the mgcv package (Wood 2024). Although LM offers a robust framework for analysing dependent data, they rely on the assumption of normally distributed conditional responses (Nazeri Tahroudi 2025). GAM offers a flexible framework for modelling non-linear relationships by fitting smooth functions to the data. They are particularly well-suited for capturing seasonal patterns and long-term trends in the occurrence and intensity of daily climatic variables (Underwood 2009; Bassett et al. 2021). The use of both modelling approaches allows for a more nuanced interpretation of the data: LM captures the overall direction of change, while GAM reveals the non-linear temporal structure, offering insights into how the trends have evolved over time. This combined approach strengthens the robustness of the analysis and improves the interpretability of climate dynamics. In this study, trends were calculated for annual mean, minimum and maximum temperatures, as well as for annual precipitation. Furthermore, the analysis was conducted separately for each season to account for potential intra-annual patterns. Daily precipitation data along with daily minimum and maximum temperatures were used to estimate the solid fraction of precipitation in terms of snow water equivalent (SWE) (Carrer et al. 2019). Traditionally, the threshold for distinguishing solid from liquid precipitation was based on the mean daily temperature, typically ranging between +1 °C (Auer 1974; Feiccabrino et al. 2015) and +2 °C (Bartlett et al. 2006; Dai 2008). However, considering only the mean temperature implies that the temperatures exceed that value during the day. By incorporating both minimum and maximum daily temperatures, the estimate aligns more closely with reality, enabling a more accurate evaluation of the solid-to-liquid precipitation ratio. In this SWE estimation scheme, +2 °C is the temperature threshold chosen for both the daily maximum and minimum temperature. Therefore, for each day with a total precipitation amount equal to P and daily maximum and minimum values Tmax and Tmin, the SWE was established as follows:

SWE = { 0 if T max > t h and T min > t h ( i.e., no snow ) P if T max < t h and T min < t h ( i.e., all snow ) P ( t h T min ) ( T max T min ) if T max > t h and T min t h ( i.e., half & and half ) }

with th = +2 °C

Since SWE values are derived from a single meteorological station and it is not possible to apply a robust interpolation method that accounts for elevation gradients due to the lack of a sufficiently dense station network (Brunetti et al. 2014; Crespi et al. 2018; Carrer et al. 2019), they should not be interpreted as absolute values of solid precipitation. Rather, they should be considered representative of the snow trends during the time period considered. Once the SWE was defined, the potential growth season (GS) (its start, end, and length) was assessed based on both daily mean temperature and presence / absence of snow cover. Following the approach of the WATFLOOD model (http://www.civil.uwaterloo.ca/watflood/), also implemented in the TREELIM model (Paulsen and Körner 2014) to identify the minimum thermal requirement for potential tree line position limits, we calculated the snowpack variation under the assumption that snow cover can constrain the actual length of the growing period, regardless of sufficiently warm air temperatures. Subsequently, we extracted the timing and duration of the thermal growing season each year based on the mean daily air temperature. The thermal start of the season (SOS) was defined as the first occurrence of six consecutive days with mean daily temperatures above 5 °C (Frich et al. 2002). The thermal end of season (EOS) was identified as the first occurrence of six consecutive days with daily mean temperatures below 5 °C after July 1. The length of the growing season (LOS) was then calculated as the number of days between SOS and EOS. Once both parameters were integrated to define the potential “climatic” start of the growing season, a LM and a GAM were applied to identify the trend in the set time period.

Results

In the following section, we report the results of the multi-temporal classification and tree line elevation analysis, emphasizing spatial and elevational shifts across different topographic aspects. These findings are complemented by an evaluation of long-term climatic trends in temperature, precipitation, snow cover, and length of the growing season, providing an integrated understanding of the environmental factors driving vegetation dynamics and tree line development in the Senales valley.

Accuracy of the RF classification

The results of the Landsat image classification are presented for years 1985 and 2022, respectively (Table 2). Both producer’s and user’s accuracies were greater than 97% for both years considering the individual classes of the binary classification, while the overall accuracies were around 98% for both years.

Table 2.

Accuracy assessments of the RF classifications from year 1985 and 2022. The values were collected from the accuracy assessment performed using the Semi-Automatic Classification plugin (SCP) in QGIS (version 3.24.1- Tisler). PA = Producer’s Accuracy; UA = User’s Accuracy.

Landsat image (year) Forest PA (%) non-Forest PA (%) Forest UA (%) non-Forest UA (%) Overall accuracy (%)
1985 97.65 99.19 98.85 98.57 98.65
2022 98.06 98.72 99.15 97.55 98.11

Spatial shift in forest cover and tree line advancements

The classified Landsat images from 1985 and 2022 provide an overview of the response of tree line dynamics in the Senales valley over a period of 37 years. In all 16 study areas, an increase in forest cover was detected between 1985 and 2022, both considering Landsat satellite images and orthophotos (Fig. 2).

The pixel analysis shows a heterogeneous spatial shift in forest cover in the 16 study areas (Table 3). Areas exposed to W and S have experienced the largest increase in forest cover in the considered time period, with an expansion ranging between ≈ +46% and ≈ +104%. Two of the N- facing areas show a mid-magnitude gain of ≈ +31% and ≈ +38% in forest cover, while the remaining two N-exposed areas showed little increases, namely ≈ +16% and ≈ +19%. The E-exposed areas show an average expansion between ≈ +18% and ≈ +25%. The study area with the lowest increase in spatial cover is S1 with ≈ +14%. The overall shift in forest cover is ≈ +44%. The slope appears to have little influence on the change in forest cover, although areas on slopes less than 30° generally have a higher percentage increase in change than steeper slopes in most cases. Study areas W1 and W2 (both W-exposed areas with steepness greater than 30°) show a substantial spatial shift, with 60.48% and 103.67% more forest cover in 2022 compared to 1985.

An overall elevational advancement of the tree lines can be seen in 15 of the 16 study areas based on the Landsat classifications (Table 3). The greatest advancements are recorded in areas exposed to W. The mean upward shifting for these four study areas is ≈ +53 m over the 37-year period. For the other cardinal directions, E, S, and N, the respective mean advancement are ≈ +31 m, ≈ +28 m and ≈ +15 m. Taking into account the areas separately, the pattern also shows that the N-facing areas generally show small upward shifts if not regression (≈-6 m to ≈ +26 m), while the areas with an E-facing slope show mid to large advancements (≈+20 m to ≈+44 m). Interestingly, S-facing areas show a relatively large advancement similar to that of E or W (≈+42 m to ≈+44 m), or a relatively small upward shifting similar to the N-facing slopes (≈+13 m to ≈+17 m).

For tree lines derived directly from orthophotos from 1982/85 and 2023, only advancements were registered (Table 4). Similarly to the Landsat-derived tree lines, the western exposure reveals the biggest advancements but with an increased magnitude. The mean tree line advances for the four aspects are ≈+77 m, ≈+38 m, ≈ +36 m and ≈ +28 m for W, N, S, and E, respectively. Since the spatial resolution of the orthophotos is 1 m, they are considered truer to the real-life values compared to the 30 m resolution of the Landsat images. Due to shadows present in the orthophotos, an accurate tree line drawing was not feasible in all areas.

A comparison between the two data sets (Table 4) reveals a considerable difference in tree line advancements in some areas. Areas N2 and W1 show the biggest mismatch between the changes registered with Landsat and orthophotos, whereas areas such as E4, S2, and S3 show very similar advancements. The tree lines from orthophotos generally show a greater elevational advance compared to those derived from Landsat, that is, an average shift of ≈+45 m compared to ≈+32 m. Only in 4 areas the difference between orthophotos and Landsat tree lines is greater than 30 meters, corresponding to 1 pixel in the Landsat images, and only two of them are greater than a two-pixel difference (marked in red in Table 4). Both data sets show a diverse magnitude of the advancements between the study areas, even with the same aspect and slope.

Figure 2. 

Examples of tree lines derived from RF classification from Landsat 5 and 8 (1a, 2a, 3a, 4a) and manual delineation based on orthophotos (1b, 2b, 3b, 4b) for the years 1985 (yellow line) and 2022 (red line) for the four different aspects. The background image is an orthophoto from 1982/85 (original resolution = 1 m) provided by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol (Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol, 2024).

Table 3.

Forest cover in the study areas for the years 1985 and 2022 (A) derived from the classification performed on Landsat satellite images. The ranking shows areas with the largest to smallest shift registered between the two years. The shift is indicated in hectares (for the single year) and percentages (the difference between years). Mean elevations for the points created with a 30 m distance along lines (B). The study areas are ranked from largest to smallest elevational shift (in meters). Exposition of the study areas is indicated by colours: Orange = W; Pink = S; Green = E; Blue = N.

A – Change (%) in Forest Cover B – Elevational Shift of the tree line (m)
Study Area 1985 (ha) 2022 (ha) ∆ (%) Study Area 1985 (m) 2022 (m) ∆ (m)
W2 A30 9.81 19.98 +103.7 W4 B30 2234.44 2303.97 +69.53
W4 B30 8.19 16.56 +102.2 W2 A30 2159.42 2216.38 +56.96
S3 B30 6.66 12.6 +89.2 W3 B30 2150.75 2200.40 +49.65
S4 B30 6.48 10.71 +65.3 E2 A30 2246.05 2289.58 +43.53
W1 A30 11.16 17.91 +60.5 S3 B30 1987.63 2029.99 +42.36
S2 A30 13.59 19.8 +45.7 S2 A30 2234.66 2275.21 +40.55
N4 B30 13.14 18.09 +37.7 W1 A30 2159.48 2194.68 +35.20
W3 B30 8.28 11.34 +37.0 E3 B30 2225.72 2258.14 +32.42
N3 B30 8.1 10.62 +31.1 E1 A30 2147.95 2177.04 +29.09
E3 B30 15.21 18.99 +24.8 N4 B30 2200.84 2227.68 +26.84
E4 B30 15.66 19.08 +21.8 N1 A30 2286.17 2308.07 +21.90
E1 A30 13.68 16.65 +21.7 E4 B30 2252.73 2272.69 +19.96
N2 A30 9.63 11.43 +18.7 S4 B30 2181.55 2198.48 +16.93
E2 A30 17.91 21.15 +18.1 N3 B30 2214.50 2231.33 +16.83
N1 A30 15.66 18.8 +16.1 S1 A30 2149.02 2162.23 +13.21
S1 A30 11.88 13.59 +14.4 N2 A30 2258.83 2252.64 -6.19
Average change +44.3 Average shift +31.2
Table 4.

Tree lines deriving from Landsat images (left) and orthophotos (right). Study areas are ranked by largest to smallest elevational shift from orthophotos. The far-right column shows differences between datasets: positive values indicate larger advance in orthophotos, negative values larger advance in Landsat. Largest differences (>30 m) are highlighted in red.

Source: Landsat Source: Orthophotos Difference (m)
Study Area 1985 (m a.s.l) 2022 (m a.s.l) ∆ Elevation (m) Study Area 1982/85 (m a.s.l) 2023 (m a.s.l) ∆ Elevation (m)
W1 A30 2159.48 2194.68 +35.20 W1 A30 2105.66 2205.92 +100.26 +65.06
W2 B30 2159.42 2216.38 +56.96 W2 A30 2149.01 2236.98 +87.97 +31.01
N2 A30 2258.83 2252.64 -6.19 N2 A30 2234.33 2311.15 +76.82 +83.01
W4 B30 2234.44 2303.97 +69.53 W4 B30 2238.44 2298.53 +60.09 -9.44
W3 B30 2150.75 2200.40 +49.65 W3 B30 2159.04 2217.85 +58.81 +9.16
E2 A30 2246.05 2289.58 +43.53 E2 A30 2263.61 2317.46 +53.85 +10.32
S4 B30 2181.55 2198.48 +16.93 S4 B30 2158.94 2209.82 +50.88 +33.95
N1 A30 2286.17 2308.07 +21.90 N1 A30 2280.58 2321.37 +40.79 +18.89
S3 B30 1987.63 2029.99 +42.36 S3 B30 1994.31 2034.02 +39.71 -2.65
S2 A30 2234.66 2275.21 +40.55 S2 A30 2259.10 2297.58 +38.48 -2.07
N3 B30 2214.50 2231.33 +16.83 N3 B30 2207.75 2237.47 +29.72 +12.89
E3 B30 2225.72 2258.14 +32.42 E3 B30 2240.94 2268.32 +27.38 -5.04
E4 A30 2252.73 2272.69 +19.96 E4 A30 2270.47 2293.64 +23.17 +3.21
S1 A30 2149.02 2162.23 +13.21 S1 A30 2162.56 2179.02 +16.46 +3.25
E1 A30 2147.95 2177.04 +29.09 E1 A30 2198.92 2206.70 +7.78 -21.31
N4 B30 2200.84 2227.68 +26.84 N4 B30 2215.05 2217.91 +2.86 -23.98
Average shift +31.2 Average shift +44.69 +12.98

Meteorological data analysis

This section details the climatic trends for temperature, precipitation, and derived variables from 1981 to 2023, to understand the possible climatic drivers in the upward shifting of the tree line.

The annual mean temperature over the considered period shows a significant trend (p-value < 0.01), indicating that the temperature pattern is not linear (Fig. 3A). When LM is applied before and after the direction change, at the point of inflection, a significant decrease in mean temperature can be observed from 1981 to 2000 (approximately -0.07 °C per year), followed by a significant annual increase of 0.05 °C from 2000 to today. By contrast, annual precipitation did not show significant trends according to either model, highlighting its complex and irregular behaviour compared to the other climatic variable (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, considering seasonal mean temperatures (Fig. 4), spring has experienced a significant overall increase, approximately 0.04 °C each year (Fig. 4A), and together with summer (Fig. 4B) and autumn (Fig. 4C), they show a significant non-linearity in the trend. Although spring observed an increase in temperature since the early 1990s, summer only shows a change in the trend ten years later together with the mean temperatures in autumn. Maximum temperatures have decreased significantly in winter (Fig. 4D) and autumn (Fig. 4C) (approximately -0.05 °C and -0.04 °C per year, respectively), while during the warmer months, no significant increase in maximum temperatures was observed. Changes in the direction of the non-linear trend were observed earlier for autumn temperatures (early 2000) and almost 10 years later for winter temperatures. Minimum temperatures show significant trends across all seasons, with notable increases of 0.04 °C, 0.04 °C, 0.02 °C, and 0.04 °C for each year in winter, summer, autumn, and spring, respectively. In the case of spring, the increase is so pronounced that the inflection point in temperature trends is virtually absent, indicating constant increments with no setbacks during the 2000’s.

Regarding seasonal precipitation, only summer experienced a significant increase in the last 37 years, with +1.62 mm per year, resulting in a total increase of approximately 60 mm during the studied period (Fig. 5). This is also the only trend that shows two direction change points, reflecting the higher variability of the pattern considering precipitations. No significant trends were observed in the other three seasons (Suppl. material 1).

Finally, we identify the potential start and end of the growing season alongside the cumulative depth of snow, measured as SWE (mm). No significant trends were detected in any of these variables, particularly regarding the growing season length, which is intrinsically linked to both its start and end dates. In addition, the depth of the snow did not show a discernible trend during the study period, reflecting a pattern characterized by high variability and a lack of consistent directional change. This behaviour appears to be closely associated with the stochastic nature of total precipitation throughout the considered time period (Suppl. material 1).

Figure 3. 

Annual mean temperature (A) and cumulative precipitation (B) between 1981 and 2023. Points represent observed values, lines show trends from GAM and LM, and shaded areas indicate GAM confidence intervals.

Figure 4. 

Seasonal mean maximum and minimum temperature trends between 1981 and 2023 for spring (A), summer (B), autumn (C), and winter (D). Points represent observed temperature values, lines show trends estimated using GAM and LM, and shaded areas indicate GAM confidence intervals. Orange = Maximum temperature; Green = Mean temperature; Blue = Minimum temperature.

Figure 5. 

Summer trend of cumulative precipitation between 1981 and 2023. Points represent observed precipitation values, lines represent trends from GAM and LM, and shaded areas indicate GAM confidence intervals.

Discussion

Application of remote sensing, machine learning, and orthophoto interpretation in tree line assessment

This study demonstrates that the combined use of satellite data from the Landsat program and ML algorithms can play a key role in ecological research that addresses land-cover changes on large spatial and temporal scales. Integration of historical aerial imagery further supports and improves classification accuracy, providing valuable context for long-term landscape dynamics. The combination of Landsat data, GIS, and the RF algorithm has been successfully used for other LULC assessments (Pham et al. 2024) and exhibited a strong classification accuracy in handling complex land cover classes and acting as an efficient method to assess landscape dynamics. Although the treeline appears to follow a similar pattern when considering both the manual delineation and the classified forest boundaries, some differences in the identification of the ecotone limit were observed. Transition ecotones, such as tree lines, are likely to exhibit significant differences in the outcome classification of forest cover, often due to groups of trees showing considerable variations in appearance, even within the same area of interest (Nguyen et al. 2022). This leads to differences in the mapping continuity in the context of photointerpretation. The precision and reliability of manual interpretation are strictly influenced by the experience of the annotators, who detect and interpret geographical features in the images based on their professional knowledge (Tarko et al. 2021). However, it is labour intensive and time consuming, and the consistency of the results is also subject to operator fatigue (Borghuis et al. 2007; Svatonova 2016). Moreover, the heterogeneity of an area due to disturbances or topographic variability remains difficult to distinguish, especially for supervised classifiers, where the high variability of the spectral signal cannot be detected well in the land use/land cover (LULC) application, particularly in mountain regions (Shimizu et al. 2023). In heterogeneous landscapes, ML algorithms can be easily misled, as their reliance on spectral information alone makes it challenging to accurately separate neighbouring land-cover classes (Beaubien 1986). The observation that orthophotos better capture site complexity may also reflect their substantially higher spatial resolution compared to Landsat imagery, in addition to the greater interpretative skill of the annotators. For example, for example, in the case of area N2, the orthophotos better capture the complexity of the site and deliver results that are truer to real life. For the remaining study areas, the deviation between the tree lines derived from Landsat and orthophotos was less than 30 meters, corresponding to less than one pixel in the Landsat images. As the overall difference was 13 m, which is not considered a large deviation, RF was confirmed as a suitable, time-saving and accurate methodology also for highly heterogeneous landscape classification.

Tree line advancements and potential climatic influence

The observed temperature and precipitation trends are in line with those of Hansson et al. (2023), who investigated the link between seasonality and tree line migration in various zones of the northern hemisphere. Taking seasonal trends separately into account is fundamental, as variations in temperature and precipitation could have different effects on the phenology of trees and therefore affect their recruitment and growth. For example, opposing summer and winter trends may counteract each other when viewed annually, or the mean and summer temperature could show a divergent trend if studied separately (Zheng et al. 2021). The measurable effect of temperatures on the advancement of the tree line is opposed, as in our case, to the lower correlation with precipitation patterns. The significant increase in minimum temperatures appears to be related to the advancement of the tree line, while maximum temperatures do not contribute to migration, but rather to the growth performances of already settled trees during the growing season (Hansson et al. 2023). Warmer autumn temperatures can extend the growing season in cold-limited areas such as high-elevation tree lines, extending the duration of the necessary conditions for tree establishment and growth (Coops et al. 2013; Paulsen and Körner 2014). Thus, the timing of meeting the thermic criteria, in spring and autumn, is more important than the actual temperatures of the rest of the year. Even if in our case no significant trend has been observed, the end of the growing season seems to occur progressively later during the year. Furthermore, the pronounced increase in spring minimum temperatures appears to have contributed to the tree line advances. This trend not only extends the duration of the growing season but also reduces the probability of frost damage in plants, as higher mean temperatures are generally correlated with a lower probability of frost events (Kharuk et al. 2009; Wipf et al. 2009). However, during extreme frost events, trees are more susceptible to frost damage, particularly in the absence of a protective snow layer that would otherwise protect seedlings and newly emerged leaves early in the growing season. Despite increasing maximum and minimum temperatures in summer, which could potentially reduce the odds of tree line migration (Hansson et al. 2023) due to the higher rate of evapotranspiration (Coops et al. 2013) and the increased probability of drought stress caused by the lack of available soil water, in the Senales Valley, the significant increase in summer precipitation may have maintained soil moisture levels sufficient to prevent trees from experiencing water stress.

Influence of topographical variables

The aspect also seems to have a considerable impact on the different magnitudes of the upward shift of the tree line. In agreement with the study by Tourville et al. (2023), the greatest tree line advancements were observed on W-exposed slopes. As a result of higher-intensity solar radiation on southern slopes, trees in these areas face two direct consequences: drier condition due to soil water deficit and higher chance of photoinhibition (oxidative damage) from more direct sunlight, reducing their recruitment and growth potential (Holtmeier and Broll 2007; Doeweler 2021), while for exposed areas in the north, the limiting factor was assessed to be mean lower temperatures (Wang et al. 2021). Based on data from the Global Wind Atlas (Davis et al. 2023), the prevailing wind direction at 10 m height – the level that most influences tree growth and mechanical stability – exhibits a bimodal pattern along a NW-SE axis, reflecting the valley-parallel thermal circulation typical of alpine valleys. In addition, both wind frequency and intensity are dominated by flows from the N-NW sector, likely associated with föhn-type downslope events. As a result, S to SE-facing slopes are consistently exposed to the strongest and most energetic winds, and this could also be the reason why the E exposure in Senales valley seems to show limited extent in tree line advancement. Wind exposed locations are cooler than those protected from wind (Holtmeier and Broll 2010), which could influence delays in phenological development during the growing season (Telewski 1995). Leaf desiccation (Cairns 2001) and leaf abrasion of the wax layers by wind-driven ice and mineral particles during winter (Dahms 1992) could both lead to increased water loss rates in evergreen species, undermining their survival rate at tree line level. In addition, wind speeds greater than 3 m s−1 reduce height growth in young trees (Kronfuss and Havranek 1999). The steepness of the slope in the Senales valley seemed to have no clear influence on the advances of the tree line. Even if some studies suggest that steeper terrain is more likely to be subjected to disturbances due to intensified geomorphological processes, which can limit further tree growth at high elevations (Holtmeier and Broll 2012; Leonelli et al. 2016), it has been proven that these factors occur mainly in areas with high slope angles (>45°), where repeated high-energy geomorphic events are likely to occur (Leonelli et al. 2016). Most of the hillsides in the Senales valley are quite steep, but also far from constant within the individual study areas. Also, our division of the areas used 30° as the threshold between steep and non-steep zones, so it might not be adequate to draw any conclusions based on this.

Limitations of the study and future prospects

We are aware that working with intermediate coarse resolution satellite data in areas of complex topography and vegetation cover can lead to ambiguous results in the classification, as smaller variations are not detectable. Therefore, in a mountainous area, scarce tree cover in the tree line ecotone can cause errors or misinterpretations (Wei et al. 2020). Finer-resolution multiband satellite data such as Sentinel-2 could provide deeper insights into land cover changes, particularly in complex and mixed land-use contexts (Babitha et al. 2025). Sentinel-2 imagery has been successfully used not only for land cover and land use classification (Topaloğlu et al. 2016; Forkuor et al. 2017), but also to assess forest ecological variables such as canopy cover (CC) and leaf area index (LAI) (Korhonen et al. 2017), as well as for the detection of herbaceous and tree species (Immitzer et al. 2016). Most comparative studies between Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 have reported equal or superior performance of Sentinel-2-based models, largely due to the inclusion of the red-edge band (B5), which has shown strong correlations with forest parameters estimation (Chrysafis et al. 2017; Astola et al. 2019). Satellite images cannot assess tree height, so it is not clear whether the tree lines derived from Landsat data follow one definition or another. Moreover, common criteria for defining forest presence or absence typically involve not only tree height, but also canopy density and structural form (e.g., the presence of shrubs). Since Landsat imagery cannot capture all these structural characteristics, the classification becomes more uncertain, especially at tree line level, where the boundaries between the two classes are inherently more fragmented. Furthermore, what can be considered as forest needs to cover a certain area to be detected as such within the Landsat image. Subsequently, this can cause a spatio-temporal delay in the assessment of the tree line as existing trees (potentially already settled in that position for a long time) are falsely registered as new, advancing individuals (Luo and Dai 2013; Garbarino et al. 2023). In recent decades, new advances in technology have led to Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) RS, which enables the measurement of discrete tree stand structures in three dimensions (Zhang et al. 2017; Sharma et al. 2021; Torresani et al. 2024a). However, terrestrial and airborne applications are limited by high costs, long processing times, and restricted availability of free user data (Gupta and Sharma 2022). Since 2018, the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI), a spaceborne LiDAR sensor developed by NASA has provided high-resolution 3D observations of the Earth’s forests (Dubayah et al. 2020; Potapov et al. 2021). GEDI data have been successfully used to derive information not only on forest canopy height (Marselis et al. 2022; Moudrý et al. 2024b; Kacic et al. 2025), but also on others key ecological parameters of forest ecosystems, such as forest biodiversity (Torresani et al. 2023; Moudrý et al. 2024a), above-ground biomass (Dubayah et al. 2022; Saarela et al. 2022), and topographic heterogeneity (Pracná et al. 2025). Thus, the integration of technologies such as GEDI with satellite imagery could provide more precise and near-real-time delineation, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of treeline boundary detection. Future studies might apply larger training datasets, as well as advanced RS technologies such as GEDI to improve the robustness of the performance of the RF algorithm and detangle the complex spatio-temporal relationship between forest dynamics and climatic drivers. Another important aspect is having a certain knowledge about the vegetation cover within the area studied beforehand to avoid classifying shrubs, such as dwarf mountain pine (e.g. Pinus mugo Turra) as trees. However, dwarf pine is not widespread in the Senales valley. Finally, another important factor is the abandonment of traditional land use practices in high mountain regions. Practices such as cattle grazing and tree logging might have previously modified or pushed the tree line to lower elevations than the climate would allow and suppressed the re-establishment of tree seedlings (Bello-Rodriguez et al. 2019; Mienna et al. 2022). Therefore, advances in forest revegetation could potentially also occur independently of warming temperatures and are rather due to changes in land use. Also taking into consideration anthropogenic disturbances would have provided a broader understanding of the tree line dynamics since the 1980s and possibly indicated strong human influence in some areas. So, investigating historical data on land use in the area would add knowledge on the influence of human activities on current and historical tree lines.

Conclusions

This study provides a comprehensive assessment of tree line dynamics in the Senales Valley over the past four decades, demonstrating the potential to integrate satellite-based RS and ML algorithms to assess ecological responses to climate change in alpine regions. The observed upward tree line shift, particularly pronounced on W-facing slopes, highlights the influence of local topography and climatic variability on vegetation patterns. Among climatic factors, the increase in minimum temperatures during spring and autumn appears to be a key driver of tree line advancement, because it potentially stretches the growing season and decreases the possibility of frost stress. The concurrent rise in summer precipitation paired with an increase in temperatures during the same season likely mitigated drought-related conditions that could have slowed the advancement. In contrast, strong föhn-type winds on S- and SE-facing slopes could have restricted upward expansion, highlighting the interplay between thermal and mechanical stress. The comparison between orthophotos and Landsat-based RF classifications confirmed the high reliability of this approach, with deviations typically below one pixel, supporting its suitability for long-term tree line monitoring. Future studies should integrate field surveys, finer resolution datasets, and historical land use information to better unravel the relative roles of climatic and anthropogenic factors shaping the alpine forest boundaries.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Irene Menegaldo: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Victoria Mølbach Sforzini: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Roberto Tognetti: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Conceptualization. Michele Torresani: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Conceptualization.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work, the authors utilized AI software (ChatGPT) to enhance the phrasing, spelling, and grammar of the manuscript. After employing this tool, the authors reviewed and edited all content as necessary and assumed full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Funding

MT and RT are partially funded by the “MAP-Rezia” (ID 0200061) project within the Interreg VI-A Italy-Switzerland Programme.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and appreciation, which helped improve the manuscript. This work was supported by the Open Access Publishing Fund of the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.

References

  • Astola H, Häme T, Sirro L, Molinier M, Kilpi J (2019) Comparison of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 imagery for forest variable prediction in boreal region. Remote Sensing of Environment 223: 1–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.01.019
  • Babitha M, Andrushia A, Anand N, Naser M, Pari Y (2025) Land use and land cover change detection from multisource satellite imagery – a hybrid convolutional neural network approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 161: 112187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112187
  • Baglioni L, Morresi D, Garbarino M, Urbinati C, Lingua E, … Vitali A (2025) Forestlines in Italian mountains are shifting upward. Biogeosciences 22: 4349–4366. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4349-2025
  • Barbeito I, Brücker R, Rixen C, Bebi P (2013) Snow fungi-induced mortality of Pinus cembra at the alpine treeline: Evidence from plantations. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 45(4): 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-45.4.455
  • Bartlett PA, MacKay MD, Verseghy DL (2006) Modified snow algorithms in the Canadian land surface scheme: Model runs and sensitivity analysis at three boreal forest stands. Atmosphere-ocean 44: 207–222. https://doi.org/10.3137/ao.440301
  • Bassett R, Janes-Bassett V, Phillipson J, Young PJ, Blair GS (2021) Climate driven trends in London’s urban heat island intensity reconstructed over 70 years using a generalized additive model. Urban Climate 40: 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100990
  • Bello-Rodriguez V, Cubas J, Del Arco MJ, Martin JL, Gonzalez-Mancebo JM (2019) Elevational and structural shifts in the treeline of an oceanic island (Tenerife, Canary Islands) in the context of global warming. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 82: 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.101918
  • Bhatt US, Walker DA, Raynolds MK, Comiso JC, Epstein HE, … Webber PJ (2010) Circumpolar Arctic tundra vegetation change is linked to sea ice decline. Earth Interactions 14(8): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010EI315.1
  • Bonanomi G, Rita A, Allevato E, Cesarano G, Saulino L, … Saracino A (2018) Anthropogenic and environmental factors affect the treeline position of Fagus sylvatica along the Apennines (Italy). Journal of Biogeography 45: 2595–2608. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13408
  • Borghuis AM, Chang K, Lee HY (2007) Comparison between automated and manual mapping of typhoon-triggered landslides from SPOT-5 imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 28: 1843–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600935638
  • Brunetti M, Maugeri M, Nanni T, Simolo C, Spinoni J (2014) High-resolution temperature climatology for Italy: Interpolation method intercomparison. International Journal of Climatology 34: 1278–1296. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3764
  • Camarero JJ, Gazol A, Sánchez-Salguero R, Fajardo A, McIntire EJB, … Wilmking M (2021) Global fading of the temperature–growth coupling at alpine and polar treelines. Global Change Biology 27: 1879–1889. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15530
  • Carmel Y, Kadmon R (1999) Effects of grazing and topography on long-term vegetation changes in a Mediterranean ecosystem in Israel. Plant Ecology 145: 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009872306093
  • Carrer M, Pellizzari E, Prendin AL, Pividori M, Brunetti M (2019) Winter precipitation – not summer temperature – is still the main driver for alpine shrub growth. The Science of the Total Environment 682: 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.152
  • Case BS, Duncan RP (2014) A novel framework for disentangling the scale-dependent influences of abiotic factors on alpine treeline position. Ecography 37(9): 838–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00280
  • Caudullo G, de Rigo D (2016) Pinus cembra in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (Eds) European Atlas of Forest Tree Species, 120–121. https://doi.org/10.2760/776635
  • Chhetri PK, Thai E (2019) Remote sensing and geographic information system techniques in treeline ecotone dynamics studies. Journal of Forestry Research 30(5): 1543–1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-019-00897-x
  • Chieffallo L, Torresani M, Zannini P, De Vries JPR, Blaha M, … Rocchini D (2025) Machine learning for biodiversity: UAV-based flower detection as an indirect proxy for bee abundance. Ecological Informatics 91: 103346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103346
  • Chrysafis I, Mallinis G, Siachalou S, Patias P (2017) Assessing the relationships between growing stock volume and Sentinel-2 imagery in a Mediterranean forest ecosystem. Remote Sensing Letters 8(6): 508–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2017.1295479
  • Congedo L (2021) Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin: A Python tool for the download and processing of remote sensing images in QGIS. Journal of Open Source Software 6(64): 3172. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03172
  • Coops NC, Morsdorf F, Schaepman ME, Zimmermann NE (2013) Characterization of an alpine treeline using airborne LiDAR data and physiological modeling. Global Change Biology 19: 3808–3821. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12319
  • Crespi A, Brunetti M, Lentini G, Maugeri M (2018) 1961–1990 high-resolution monthly precipitation climatologies for Italy. International Journal of Climatology 38: 878–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5217
  • Cudlín P, Seják J, Pokorný J, Albrechtová J, Bastian O, Marek M (2013) Forest ecosystem services under climate change and air pollution. In: Matyssek R, et al. (Eds) Climate change, air pollution and global challenges. Elsevier, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-098349-3.00024-4
  • Dahms A (1992) Wachstumsbedingungen bei Picea engelmannii und Abies lasiocarpa an unterschiedlich windexponierten Standorten im Waldgrenzbereich der Colorado Front Range, U.S.A. PhD Thesis, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
  • Das B, Prasad J (2025) Cellular Automata (CA) and AI-based Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) approaches in LULC change dynamics using multi-spectral and multi-decadal Landsat data in Haldia, India. Remote Sensing in Earth Systems Sciences 8: 1223–1243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41976-025-00246-z
  • Datta D, Dey M, Neogy S, Basu Roy T, Dutta D, … Nandi G (2022) Assessing vegetation fragmentation and plantation efficiency in an intertidal mudflat of eastern India using Radar Forest Degradation Index and spatial metrics. Geocarto International 37(25): 9298–9319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.2017014
  • Davis NN, Badger J, Hahmann AN, Hansen BO, Mortensen NG, … Drummond R (2023) The Global Wind Atlas: A high-resolution dataset of climatologies and associated web-based application.Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 104(8): E1507–E1525. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0075.1
  • De Boer HJ, Robertson I, Clisby R, Loader NJ, Gagen MM, … McCarroll D (2019) Tree-ring isotopes suggest atmospheric drying limits temperature-growth responses of treeline bristlecone pine. Tree Physiology 39(7): 983–999. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpz018
  • Doeweler F (2021) Causes of recruitment limitation at abrupt alpine treelines. PhD Thesis, Auckland University of Technology.
  • Dubayah R, Blair JB, Goetz S, Fatoyinbo L, Hansen M, … Silva C (2020) The global ecosystem dynamics investigation: High-resolution laser ranging of the Earth’s forests and topography. Science of Remote Sensing 1: 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2020.100002
  • Dubayah R, Armston J, Healey SP, Bruening JM, Patterson PL, … Luthcke S (2022) GEDI launches a new era of biomass inference from space. Environmental Research Letters 17(9): 095001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac8694
  • Feiccabrino J, Graff W, Lundberg A, Sandström N, Gustafsson D (2015) Meteorological knowledge useful for the improvement of snow rain separation in surface based models. Hydrology 2: 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology2040266
  • Feng L, Naz I, Quddoos A, Zafar Z, Gan M, … Almutairi KF (2025) Exploring rangeland dynamics in Punjab, Pakistan: Integrating LULC, LST, and remote sensing for ecosystem analysis (2000–2020). Rangeland Ecology and Management 98: 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.09.008
  • Forkuor G, Dimobe K, Serme I, Tondoh JE (2017) Landsat-8 vs. Sentinel-2: Examining the added value of Sentinel-2 red-edge bands to land-use and land-cover mapping in Burkina Faso. GIScience & Remote Sensing 54(5): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2017.1370169
  • Frich PL, Alexander LV, Della-Marta PM, Gleason B, Haylock M, … Peterson T (2002) Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century. Climate Research 19: 193–212. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr019193
  • Garbarino M, Morresi D, Anselmetto N, Weisberg PJ (2023) Treeline remote sensing: From tracking treeline shifts to multi-dimensional monitoring of ecotonal change. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 9: 729–742. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.351
  • Gatti RC, Lobos RBC, Torresani M, Rocchini D (2025) An early warning system based on machine learning detects huge forest loss in Ukraine during the war. Global Ecology and Conservation 58: e03427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03427
  • Gupta R, Sharma LK (2022) Mixed tropical forests canopy height mapping using spaceborne LiDAR GEDI and multisensor imagery. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 27: 100817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100817
  • Hansson A, Dargusch P, Shulmeister J (2021) A review of modern treeline migration, the factors controlling it and the implications for carbon storage. Journal of Mountain Science 18: 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6221-1
  • Hansson A, Yang WH, Dargusch P, Shulmeister J (2023) Investigation of the relationship between treeline migration and changes in temperature and precipitation for the Northern Hemisphere and sub-regions. Current Forestry Reports 9: 72–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-023-00180-7
  • He S, Zhu L, Li Y, Xia Q, Zheng Q, … Zou X (2025) A comparative analysis of machine learning-based methods for impervious surface mapping using SAR and optical data. Geocarto International 40(1): 2521833. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2025.2521833
  • Hussain K, Mehmood K, Yujun S, Badshah T, Anees SA, … Bilal M (2024) Analysing LULC transformations using remote sensing data: Insights from a multilayer perceptron neural network approach. Annals of GIS 31(3): 473–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2024.2343399
  • Immitzer M, Vuolo F, Atzberger C (2016) First experience with Sentinel-2 data for crop and tree species classifications in Central Europe. Remote Sensing 8(3): 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8030166
  • Kacic P, Gessner U, Hakkenberg CR, Holzwarth S, Müller J, … Kuenzer C (2025) Characterizing local forest structural complexity based on multi-platform and-sensor derived indicators. Ecological Indicators 170: 113085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113085
  • Kharuk VI, Ranson KJ, Im ST, Dvinskaya ML (2009) Response of Pinus sibirica and Larix sibirica to climate change in southern Siberian alpine forest–tundra ecotone. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 24: 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580902845823
  • Korhonen L, Hadi F, Packalen P, Rautiainen M (2017) Comparison of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 in the estimation of boreal forest canopy cover and leaf area index. Remote Sensing of Environment 195: 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.021
  • Kronfuss H, Havranek WM (1999) Effects of elevation and wind on the growth of Pinus cembra L. in a subalpine afforestation. Phyton (Austria). Eurosilva 39(4): 99–106. [Special Issue] [DOI not available.]
  • Lischke H, Zimmermann NE, Bolliger J, Rickebusch S, Löffler TJ (2006) TreeMig: A forest-landscape model for simulating spatio-temporal patterns from stand to landscape scale. Ecological Modelling 199(4): 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.11.046
  • López-Moreno JI, Vicente-Serrano SM, Gimeno L, Nieto R (2009) Stability of the seasonal distribution of precipitation in the Mediterranean region: Observations since 1950 and projections for the 21st century. Geophysical Research Letters 36: L10703. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037956
  • Luo G, Dai L (2013) Detection of alpine tree line change with high spatial resolution remotely sensed data. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 7(1): 073520. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.7.073520
  • Mahapatra S, Majhi BK, Sarkar MS, Datta D, Mishra AP, Rathnayake U (2025) Understanding forest fragmentation dynamics and identifying drivers for forest cover loss using random forest models to develop effective forest management strategies in north-east India. Results in Engineering 26: 104640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104640
  • Marselis SM, Keil P, Chase JM, Dubayah R (2022) The use of GEDI canopy structure for explaining variation in tree species richness in natural forests. Environmental Research Letters 17(4): 045003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac583f
  • Mehmood K, Anees SA, Luo M, Akram M, Zubair M, … Khan WR (2024) Assessing chilgoza pine (Pinus gerardiana) forest fire severity: Remote sensing analysis, correlations, and predictive modeling for enhanced management strategies. Trees, Forests and People 16: 100521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100521
  • Mienna IM, Austrheim G, Klanderud K, Bollandsås OM, Speed JDM (2022) Legacy effects of herbivory on treeline dynamics along an elevational gradient. Oecologia 198: 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05125-8
  • Moudrý V, Gábor L, Marselis S, Pracná P, Barták V, … Wild J (2024a) Comparison of three global canopy height maps and their applicability to biodiversity modeling: Accuracy issues revealed. Ecosphere 15(10): e70026. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70026
  • Moudrý V, Prošek J, Marselis S, Marešová J, Šárovcová E, … Eltner A (2024b) How to find accurate terrain and canopy height GEDI footprints in temperate forests and grasslands? Earth and Space Science 11(10): e2024EA003709. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EA003709
  • Mountain Research Initiative EDW Working Group (2015) Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world. Nature Climate Change 5: 424–430. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2563
  • Nazeri Tahroudi M (2025) Comprehensive global assessment of precipitation trend and pattern variability considering their distribution dynamics. Scientific Reports 15: 22458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06050-5
  • Nguyen TA, Kellenberger B, Tuia D (2022) Mapping forest in the Swiss Alps treeline ecotone with explainable deep learning. Remote Sensing of Environment 281: 113217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113217
  • Olofsson P, Foody GM, Herold M, Stehman SV, Woodcock CE, Wulder MA (2014) Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote Sensing of Environment 148: 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.015
  • Ouchra H, Belangour A, Erraissi A (2023) Machine learning algorithms for satellite image classification using Google Earth Engine and Landsat satellite data: Morocco case study. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions 11: 71127–71142. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3293828
  • Perrone M, Conti L, Galland T, Komárek J, Lagner O, … Malavasi M (2024) Flower power: How flowering affects spectral diversity metrics and their relationship with plant diversity. Ecological Informatics 81: 102589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102589
  • Pham QB, Ali SA, Parvin F, On VV, Sidek LM, … Minh NN (2024) Multi-spectral remote sensing and GIS-based analysis for decadal land use cover changes and future prediction using random forest tree and artificial neural network. Advances in Space Research 74(1): 17–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.027
  • Potapov P, Li X, Hernandez-Serna A, Tyukavina A, Hansen MC, … Hofton M (2021) Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. Remote Sensing of Environment 253: 112165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112165
  • Pracná P, Šárovcová E, Liu X, Eltner A, Marešová J, … Moudry V (2025) Towards 90 m resolution digital terrain model combining ICESat-2 and GEDI data: Balancing accuracy and sampling intensity. Science of Remote Sensing 12: 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2025.100293
  • QGIS Development Team (2022) QGIS Geographic Information System, Version 3.24.1-Tisler. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. https://qgis.org [Accessed October 2024]
  • R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  • Rocchini D, Torresani M, Ricotta C (2024) On the mathematical properties of spatial Rao’s Q to compute ecosystem heterogeneity. Theoretical Ecology 17(3): 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-024-00587-3
  • Rossi C, McMillan NA, Schweizer JM, Gholizadeh H, Groen M, … Hauser LT (2024) Parcel level temporal variance of remotely sensed spectral reflectance predicts plant diversity. Environmental Research Letters 19(7): 074023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad545a
  • Saarela S, Holm S, Healey SP, Patterson PL, Yang Z, … Ståhl G (2022) Comparing frameworks for biomass prediction for the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation. Remote Sensing of Environment 278: 113074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113074
  • Shahzad F, Mehmood K, Hussain K, Haidar I, Anees SA, … Feng Z (2024) Comparing machine learning algorithms to predict vegetation fire detections in Pakistan. Fire Ecology 20: 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-024-00289-5
  • Sharma LK, Gupta R, Pandey PC (2021) Future aspects and potential of the remote sensing technology to meet the natural resource needs. In: Advances in Remote Sensing for Natural Resource Monitoring. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119616016.ch22
  • Shimizu K, Murakami W, Furuichi T, Estoque RC (2023) Mapping land use/land cover changes and forest disturbances in Vietnam using a Landsat temporal segmentation algorithm. Remote Sensing 15: 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030851
  • Sylvain JD, Drolet G, Brown N (2019) Mapping dead forest cover using a deep convolutional neural network and digital aerial photography. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 156: 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.07.010
  • Tarko A, Tsendbazar N, de Bruin S, Bregt AK (2021) Producing consistent visually interpreted land cover reference data: Learning from feedback. International Journal of Digital Earth 14(1): 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2020.1729878
  • Telewski FW (1995) Wind-induced physiological and developmental responses in trees. In: Coutts MP, Grace J (Eds) Wind and trees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 237–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511600425.015
  • Timoney KP, Mamet SD, Cheng R, Lee P, Robinson AL, … Wein R (2018) Tree cover response to climate change in the forest–tundra ecotone of north-central Canada: Fire-driven decline, not northward advance. Ecoscience 26: 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2018.1532868
  • Topaloğlu RH, Sertel E, Musaoğlu N (2016) Assessment of classification accuracies of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data for land cover/use mapping. International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLI B 8: 1055–1059. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B8-1055-2016
  • Torresani M, Kleijn D, de Vries JPR, Bartholomeus H, Chieffallo L, … Rocchini D (2023) A novel approach for surveying flowers as a proxy for bee pollinators using drone images. Ecological Indicators 149: 110123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110123
  • Torresani M, Rocchini D, Ceola G, De Vries JPR, Feilhauer H, … Gamper HA (2024a) Grassland vertical height heterogeneity predicts flower and bee diversity: An UAV photogrammetric approach. Scientific Reports 14(1): 809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50308-9
  • Torresani M, Rocchini D, Ceola G, de Vries JPR, Feilhauer H, … Kleijn D (2024b) Grassland vertical height heterogeneity predicts flower and bee diversity: An UAV photogrammetric approach. Scientific Reports 14(1): 809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50308-9
  • Torresani M, Rossi C, Mina M, Menegaldo I, Cappuccio M, … Tognetti R (2025) Spectral heterogeneity from the spaceborne imaging spectrometer EnMAP reveals biodiversity patterns in forest ecosystems. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 144: 104902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104902
  • Tourville J, Publicover D, Dovciak M (2023) Forests on the move: Tracking climate-related treeline changes in mountains of the northeastern United States. Journal of Biogeography 50(12): 1993–2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14708
  • Wang S, Wang X, Gai X, Zhou L, Zhou W, … Yu D (2021) Topography-dependent climatic sensitivities in spruce tree growth in the Changbai Mountain, northeast China. Trees (Berlin) 35: 961–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02094-y
  • Wipf S, Stoeckli V, Bebi P (2009) Winter climate change in alpine tundra: Plant responses to changes in snow depth and snowmelt timing. Climatic Change 94: 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9546-x
  • Zhang Z, Cao L, She G (2017) Estimating forest structural parameters using canopy metrics derived from airborne LiDAR data in subtropical forests. Remote Sensing 9(9): 940. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090940
  • Zheng L, Shi P, Zhou T, Hou G, Song M, Yu F (2021) Tree regeneration patterns on contrasting slopes at treeline ecotones in eastern Tibet. Forests 12(11): 1605. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12111605
  • Zhou W, Mazepa V, Shiyatov S, Shalaumova YV, Zhang T, … Ivanov V (2021) Spatiotemporal dynamics of encroaching tall vegetation in timberline ecotone of the Polar Urals region, Russia. Environmental Research Letters 17(1): 014017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3694

Topical Collection: "Advances in vegetation analysis through remote sensing technology". Edited by Gianmarco Tavilla, Valeria Tomaselli, Maria Adamo, Karol Mikula, Eliana Lima da Fonseca, Sergio Vargas Zesati.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Suppl. table and figures

Irene Menegaldo, Victoria Mølbach Sforzini, Roberto Tognetti, Michele Torresani

Data type: pdf

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (2.02 MB)
login to comment